一键导入
feature
Create a structured feature ticket (user story, acceptance criteria, design notes) for a new user-facing feature.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
菜单
Create a structured feature ticket (user story, acceptance criteria, design notes) for a new user-facing feature.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | feature |
| description | Create a structured feature ticket (user story, acceptance criteria, design notes) for a new user-facing feature. |
| argument-hint | <short title of the feature> |
| allowed-tools | Bash, Read, Write |
Creates a structured GitHub Issue for a new feature with a user story, acceptance criteria, and design notes. Asks guided questions, shows the formatted ticket for confirmation, then creates the issue.
Read the registry path via portfolio_registry, the per-project docs dir via portfolio_projects_dir, and the ideas backlog via portfolio_ideas_backlog — all from .claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh. Source the helper at the top of any bash block that touches those paths:
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
registry=$(portfolio_registry)
Defaults match today's single-fork layout (./apexyard.projects.yaml, ./projects, ./projects/ideas-backlog.md). Adopters in split-portfolio mode override the portfolio.{registry, projects_dir, ideas_backlog} keys in .claude/project-config.json. Don't hardcode literal apexyard.projects.yaml or projects/ paths in bash blocks — the helper resolves whichever mode the adopter is in. See docs/multi-project.md.
/feature Profile picture upload
/feature Arabic language support
/feature Likes on answers
Before any gh issue create (or other tracker CLI), write this skill's name to the active-issue-skill marker so require-skill-for-issue-create.sh lets the command through. At skill entry:
# Resolve the ops-fork root the SAME way the hooks do (_lib-ops-root.sh):
# anchor on the .apexyard-fork marker (split-portfolio v2 — onboarding.yaml
# lives in the sibling portfolio repo, NOT the ops fork), falling back to the
# onboarding.yaml + apexyard.projects.yaml pair (single-fork v1).
ops_root="$PWD"; r="$PWD"
while [ "$r" != / ]; do
if [ -f "$r/.apexyard-fork" ] || { [ -f "$r/onboarding.yaml" ] && [ -f "$r/apexyard.projects.yaml" ]; }; then
ops_root="$r"; break
fi
r=${r%/*}
done
mkdir -p "$ops_root/.claude/session"
echo "feature" > "$ops_root/.claude/session/active-issue-skill"
Remove the marker on every exit path (success, early-exit, user cancel, error):
rm -f "$ops_root/.claude/session/active-issue-skill"
The clear-issue-skill-marker.sh SessionStart hook sweeps stale markers from killed sessions, but a clean exit should never leave one behind. See AgDR-0030.
Read .claude/session/current-ticket to determine which repo we're working in. If no active ticket, check apexyard.projects.yaml for managed projects. If only one project, use it. If multiple, ask:
Which project is this feature for?
If no projects are registered, ask for the repo in owner/repo format.
Take the title from $ARGUMENTS. If empty, ask:
What's the feature? Give me a short title.
Ask conversationally — do NOT batch all questions. Wait for each answer before asking the next.
a) User Story
Who is this for and what do they want?
Format: As a [persona], I want [goal] so that [benefit].
If the user gives a casual answer ("users should be able to upload photos"), restructure it into the user story format and confirm.
b) Acceptance Criteria
What are the acceptance criteria? List the specific things that must be true when this is done.
(You can write them as bullet points — I'll format them as checkboxes.)
c) Design Notes
Any design notes? (screenshots, mockups, Figma links, or "no UI changes")
If the user says something like "no" or "none", use "No UI changes" as the value.
d) Priority
Priority?
1. P0 — must-have for current milestone
2. P1 — ship soon after launch
3. P2 — future / v2+
e) Out of Scope (optional)
Anything explicitly out of scope? (or press Enter to skip)
Resolve the feature body template via the portfolio helper so adopter overrides win when present:
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-read-config.sh"
source "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.claude/hooks/_lib-portfolio-paths.sh"
template=$(portfolio_resolve_template tickets/feature.md) # → custom-templates/tickets/feature.md if present, else templates/tickets/feature.md
Single-fork adopters (no portfolio block) and adopters with no override fall straight through to templates/tickets/feature.md. Adopters who want a customised feature-body shape drop their version at <private_repo>/custom-templates/tickets/feature.md. See templates/README.md for the path-mirroring convention.
Backward-compat fallback: if portfolio_resolve_template returns empty (template file missing — partial adopter setup), fall back to the inline heredoc body below and print a one-line WARN on stderr (WARN: tickets/feature.md template missing — using inline fallback). This preserves the pre-refactor behaviour for adopters whose installations don't yet have the new template files.
Substitute the gathered inputs into the resolved template (or the inline heredoc fallback), then display the full ticket using the resolved shape (the default templates/tickets/feature.md shape is reproduced below):
Here's the ticket I'll create:
---
**[Feature] {title}**
## User Story
As a {persona}, I want {goal} so that {benefit}.
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {criterion 1}
- [ ] {criterion 2}
- [ ] ...
## Design Notes
{notes}
## Out of Scope
{out of scope or "—"}
## Effort Estimate
TBD
## Glossary
| Term | Definition |
|------|------------|
| {term} | {definition} |
---
Labels: enhancement, {P0|P1|P2}
Repo: {owner/repo}
Create this ticket? (yes / edit / cancel)
Dispatch through tracker_create (#670 / AgDR-0072) so the issue lands in
this project's tracker (GitHub / GitLab / custom) per its tracker: block
in apexyard.projects.yaml. For a GitHub adopter this runs gh issue create
unchanged.
# Resolve + source the tracker lib (it lives in the ops fork's hooks dir).
tracker_lib="$(r="$PWD"; while [ -n "$r" ] && [ "$r" != / ]; do \
[ -f "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-tracker.sh" ] && { echo "$r/.claude/hooks/_lib-tracker.sh"; break; }; \
r="${r%/*}"; done)"
# shellcheck source=/dev/null
. "$tracker_lib"
body_file="$(mktemp)"
cat > "$body_file" <<'BODY'
{formatted body}
BODY
# tracker_create <owner/repo> <title> <body_file> [<labels_csv>] → {"ref","url"}.
# Gated by require-skill-for-issue-create.sh; the step-0 marker keeps it allowed.
result="$(tracker_create "{owner/repo}" "[Feature] {title}" "$body_file" "enhancement,{priority}")"
rc=$?
rm -f "$body_file"
if [ "$rc" -eq 3 ]; then
# tracker.kind=none (shape-only): no tracker to create in. tracker_create
# printed the rendered ticket body to stdout — surface it for manual /
# external filing instead of a non-existent CLI/auth failure.
echo "Tracker is 'none' (shape-only) — nothing was created in a tracker." >&2
echo "File this in your external system (e.g. Jira/Linear via MCP):" >&2
printf '%s\n' "$result"
exit 0
elif [ "$rc" -ne 0 ] || [ -z "$result" ]; then
echo "Issue creation failed — check the tracker CLI / auth. Nothing was created." >&2
exit 1
fi
ref="$(printf '%s' "$result" | jq -r '.ref')"
url="$(printf '%s' "$result" | jq -r '.url')"
echo "Created: {owner/repo}#${ref} — {title}"
echo "${url}"
enhancement always, plus the priority label. The priority label scheme is read from .claude/project-config.*.json → .ticket.label_priority_scheme (default P0,P1,P2,P3); forks that use a different scheme (e.g. priority-p0) configure it there.[Feature] by default. The accepted prefix list is read from .claude/project-config.*.json → .ticket.prefix_whitelist; if a fork has added alternate feature-class prefixes (e.g. [Enhancement]), this skill will accept them. See apexyard#109 for the schema.Part of ApexYard — multi-project SDLC framework for Claude Code · MIT.
Review a PR for quality, security, and standards compliance. Invokes the Code Reviewer agent (Rex).
Review a technical design / migration AgDR / feature spec for architectural soundness BEFORE the Build phase. Invokes the Solution Architect agent (Tariq) — the non-code analog of /code-review.
Score a review agent (Rex/Hakim/Tariq) against a labeled PR corpus — ground-truth defect-set overlap, never a prose rubric. Headline metric is approve-precision.
Security-focused PR review for vulnerabilities and best practices. Invokes the Security Reviewer agent (Shield).
Record per-PR design-review approval (UI merge gate). ONLY on an explicit per-PR designer "approved".
Record per-PR CEO approval and merge in one turn. ONLY on an explicit per-PR "approved" — never on umbrella "go".