菜单
Review an already compiled research manuscript for submission readiness, covering traceable artifacts, citation/claim checks, PDF status, anonymity, and unresolved blockers. Use after paper-compile and before actual venue submission.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/MengkunLiang/DIG-ResearchOS --skill submission-readiness命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | submission-readiness |
| description | Review an already compiled research manuscript for submission readiness, covering traceable artifacts, citation/claim checks, PDF status, anonymity, and unresolved blockers. Use after paper-compile and before actual venue submission. |
| tools | ["read_file","write_file","list_files","audit_manuscript_claims","finish_task"] |
| strict_tools | true |
| model_tier | standard |
| temperature | 0.1 |
| allowed_read_prefixes | ["user_inputs/submission-readiness/","drafts/","submission/","literature/","_runtime/skill_sessions/"] |
| allowed_write_prefixes | ["submission/"] |
| outputs_expected | {"readiness_report":"submission/skill_submission_readiness.md","readiness_record":"submission/skill_submission_readiness.json"} |
| interaction | {"mode":"guided","language":"zh-CN","summary":"对已编译投稿材料做最终就绪检查，区分通过、警告、阻塞项和人工确认项；不替用户提交论文。","request_required":true,"request_prompt":"请说明目标会议/期刊、是否匿名投稿、需要检查的政策或截止要求，以及是否允许仅输出报告。","example_request":"为匿名 NeurIPS 投稿做最终检查，核对 PDF、引用、作者信息和实验 claim；只生成报告。","required_inputs":[{"id":"compiled_bundle","label":"已编译投稿包","description":"必须已有真实 PDF 和 compile report；此 Skill 不会把未编译 TeX 说成可投稿。","paths":"[Truncated]","extensions":"[Truncated]","min_bytes":80,"example":"submission/compile_report.json"}],"optional_inputs":[{"id":"manuscript","label":"稿件源码","description":"可选；用于额外运行机械 claim/citation 审计。","paths":"[Truncated]","extensions":"[Truncated]","min_bytes":120,"example":"submission/bundle/main.tex"},{"id":"venue_rules","label":"目标 venue 规则","description":"可选；用户提供的官方要求或内部 checklist，不把模型记忆当作政策。","paths":"[Truncated]","extensions":"[Truncated]","min_bytes":40,"example":"user_inputs/submission-readiness/venue_rules.md"}],"outputs":[{"id":"readiness_report","label":"投稿就绪报告","path":"submission/skill_submission_readiness.md","description":"清晰列出通过项、warning、blocker、人工确认和证据路径。"},{"id":"readiness_record","label":"结构化就绪记录","path":"submission/skill_submission_readiness.json","description":"机器可读的检查结果、路径、严重性和下一步。"}]} |
Read the intake packet first. For standalone material, stage user_inputs/submission-readiness/compile_report.json into submission/compile_report.json only when the user supplied a real report and preserve its exact content; otherwise ask for the missing compiled bundle through user_inputs/submission-readiness/_followup_request.md and ask_human. In a project workspace, inspect the existing report and PDF rather than assuming that file existence proves submission readiness.
Verify the compile report records a successful real PDF and that referenced files exist. Check the supplied venue rules only as supplied text; do not invent policy requirements. When source exists, run the mechanical manuscript audit and carry hard failures into the readiness report.
Classify every item as pass, warning, blocker, or human_confirmation_required. Check anonymity conservatively: if names, affiliations, acknowledgements, repository links, or identifying comments are present, report them for human review rather than guessing venue policy. Do not submit, upload, remove author information, or alter the compiled bundle.