基于 SOC 职业分类
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/MikeTreml/MissionControl --skill options-scoring命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
Expert Electron application architecture skill for IPC design, main/renderer/preload boundaries, security hardening, performance optimization, packaging strategy, native integration, and cross-platform desktop development. Use when reviewing or designing Electron apps, planning migrations, auditing architecture risks, choosing IPC patterns, diagnosing startup or memory issues, or coordinating related Electron skills.
Generates DrawIO XML diagrams for Amazon Web Services architectures from text descriptions or images. Analyzes existing .drawio files to extract AWS components. Use for AWS architecture diagrams, cloud infrastructure documentation, or when converting AWS diagram images to editable DrawIO format.
Generates DrawIO XML diagrams for Google Cloud Platform architectures from text descriptions or images. Analyzes existing .drawio files to extract GCP components. Use for GCP architecture diagrams, cloud infrastructure documentation, or when converting GCP diagram images to editable DrawIO format.
| name | options-scoring |
| description | Multi-criteria decision analysis for solution options with weighted scoring and sensitivity analysis |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Write","Glob","Grep","Bash"] |
| metadata | {"specialization":"business-analysis","domain":"business","id":"SK-014","category":"Decision Analysis"} |
The Options Scoring Calculator skill provides specialized capabilities for multi-criteria decision analysis when evaluating solution options. This skill enables objective comparison of alternatives through weighted scoring, sensitivity analysis, and comprehensive recommendation development.
Define evaluation criteria for comparing these options:
[Options description]
Include criteria categories and recommended weights.
Calculate weighted scores for these options:
Criteria and Weights: [Criteria list with weights]
Options: [Option details with ratings]
Generate ranking and score breakdown.
Perform sensitivity analysis on this evaluation:
[Evaluation results]
Vary weights by +/- 20% and show impact on ranking.
Generate a recommendation from this analysis:
[Scored options with analysis]
Include confidence level and key considerations.
This skill integrates with the following business analysis processes:
| Criteria | Weight | Option A | Option B | Option C |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | 30% | 4 (1.2) | 3 (0.9) | 5 (1.5) |
| Quality | 25% | 5 (1.25) | 4 (1.0) | 3 (0.75) |
| Speed | 20% | 3 (0.6) | 5 (1.0) | 4 (0.8) |
| Risk | 15% | 4 (0.6) | 3 (0.45) | 4 (0.6) |
| Fit | 10% | 3 (0.3) | 4 (0.4) | 5 (0.5) |
| Total | 100% | 3.95 | 3.75 | 4.15 |
| Score | Description | Guidelines |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Excellent | Exceeds all requirements |
| 4 | Good | Meets all requirements well |
| 3 | Acceptable | Meets minimum requirements |
| 2 | Poor | Partially meets requirements |
| 1 | Unacceptable | Does not meet requirements |
| Category | Example Criteria |
|---|---|
| Financial | Cost, ROI, TCO, Payback period |
| Technical | Performance, Scalability, Security |
| Operational | Ease of use, Maintenance, Support |
| Strategic | Alignment, Future-proofing, Innovation |
| Risk | Implementation risk, Vendor risk, Technology risk |
| Time | Time to implement, Time to value |
| Dimension | Key Questions |
|---|---|
| Technical | Can we build/implement it? Do we have the skills? |
| Operational | Can we operate it? Does it fit our processes? |
| Economic | Can we afford it? Is the ROI acceptable? |
| Legal | Does it comply with regulations? |
| Schedule | Can we deliver it in time? |
RECOMMENDATION: [Option X]
CONFIDENCE LEVEL: [High/Medium/Low]
RATIONALE:
- [Key strength 1]
- [Key strength 2]
- [Key strength 3]
KEY RISKS:
- [Risk 1 with mitigation]
- [Risk 2 with mitigation]
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:
- Option Y: Not recommended because [reason]
- Option Z: Not recommended because [reason]
NEXT STEPS:
1. [Immediate action]
2. [Follow-up action]