Use when reviewing, revising, or deciding whether to complete a Research Architect draft, especially when its reference adaptation, design, evidence, citations, claim boundaries, copying risk, or missing upstream artifacts need an auditable diagnosis.
Use when a user needs distinct, feasible Research Architect research-question options from a raw topic, available materials, constraints, and—when available—transferable logic from a target reference paper.
Use when a Research Architect project or existing draft needs claim-level literature support for background, positioning, methods, interpretation, limitations, or revision, rather than broad generic literature searching.
Use when a Research Architect candidate research spine and approved exemplar adaptation need to become a feasible, field-appropriate study design, analysis plan, validation strategy, and user action plan.
Use when a Research Architect project has an evidence-ready spine, evidence and claim trail, citation support, and adapted reference logic that need to become a field-appropriate first draft or an audited revision.
Use when executed research materials, results, observations, analyses, or draft claims need to become a Research Architect evidence bank, claim register, evidence-display plan, and bounded interpretation trail.
Use when starting or resuming a Research Architect project—including an existing draft that needs review—and you need to capture target reference papers, project materials, constraints, verification status, and the next deliverable.
Use when a Research Architect project needs accessible target-reference papers analyzed for transferable research logic, or candidate questions positioned against literature, gaps, evidence standards, and independent study options—not generic bibliography collection.