菜单
Review paper text or PDFs from a final-check or reviewer perspective. Use when the user wants fatal logic checks on English LaTeX, or a harsh reviewer-style report on a full paper PDF with concrete rejection risks and revision advice.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/moonlarry/codex-paper-skills --skill paper-review命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Run a one-question-at-a-time innovation-gate interview before algorithm design, experiment planning, or paper drafting. Use to test whether a research problem extends the knowledge boundary, whether existing methods or direct transfer already solve it, and whether proposed components map to defensible subproblems and evidence. Always write paper/PAPER_IDEA_GRILL.md, including a conditional or not-ready diagnosis. Do not use for completed-experiment claim judgment, post-paper evidence auditing, manuscript review, or prose rewriting.
Run a one-question-at-a-time claim-evidence reconciliation only after experiments are complete and a full or near-complete paper exists. Use to trace central Conclusion claims back through the Abstract, Introduction, Results, scientific-support verdicts, and raw-evidence audits, then write paper/CLAIM_EVIDENCE_RECONCILIATION.md. Route missing prerequisites to experiment-result-to-claim or experiment-claim-audit. Do not use before experiments, for experiment planning, broad paper review, manuscript rewriting, or replacing a zero-context evidence audit.
Calibrate academic writing style based on external samples. Extract complete style profile from reference, diagnose target paper, and generate restructured copy. Always performs full analysis (deep) and complete pipeline (profile → diagnosis → restructure). Outputs to ./paper-style/runs/<timestamp>-<target>/.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | paper-review |
| description | Review paper text or PDFs from a final-check or reviewer perspective. Use when the user wants fatal logic checks on English LaTeX, or a harsh reviewer-style report on a full paper PDF with concrete rejection risks and revision advice. |
Use this skill for evaluation rather than rewriting. For full-paper PDF review where layout and page context matter, also use the local pdf skill workflow when available.
references/logic-check.md.references/reviewer-report.md and use pdf workflow first if rendering or page-level inspection matters.references/logic-check.mdreferences/reviewer-report.mdpaper-refine.