Skip to main content

dependency-supply-chain-audit

Use when working on dependency review, vulnerable packages, lockfile risk, license concerns, and supply-chain hygiene. Focus on known CVEs, typosquatting risk, lockfile integrity, and update safety.

跳到安装

来源信息

仓库
Mr-Q526/TeamCC-Platform
最近来源活动
2026年4月15日 03:16
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
8
分支
1

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

文件资源管理器
4 个文件

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
schemaVersion
2026-04-11T00:00:00.000Z
skillId
security/dependency-supply-chain-audit
name
dependency-supply-chain-audit
displayName
Dependency Supply Chain Audit
description
Use when working on dependency review, vulnerable packages, lockfile risk, license concerns, and supply-chain hygiene. Focus on known CVEs, typosquatting risk, lockfile integrity, and update safety.
aliases
["dependency-supply-chain-audit","Dependency Supply Chain Audit","dependencysupplychainaudit","依赖","依赖安全","dependency","供应链","软件供应链","链路","supply","chain","audit","代码审查","code review","评审","dependency security","供应链安全"]
version
0.1.0
sourceHash
sha256:6654ebbcbda29454e3a8ce8b881bb5f25e17adacde2d834c112f47a2e3970d40
domain
security
departmentTags
["security-platform"]
sceneTags
["security-audit","review"]
# Dependency Supply Chain Audit Use this skill when the task involves dependency review, vulnerable packages, lockfile risk, license concerns, and supply-chain hygiene. Goal: produce reliable engineering guidance and implementation steps focused on known CVEs, typosquatting risk, lockfile integrity, and update safety. ## Working model 1. Identify the affected system, data, users, and failure modes. 2. Define invariants, inputs, outputs, ownership, and rollback needs. 3. Prefer small, auditable changes with explicit validation. 4. Call out security, performance, concurrency, and data-loss risks when relevant. 5. Finish with concrete verification steps and residual risks. ## Rules - Ground recommendations in the current codebase or runtime evidence. - Prefer explicit contracts, typed boundaries, and defensive validation. - Do not hide operational concerns behind generic best practices. - Include negative cases, edge cases, and failure behavior. - For review tasks, list findings first with file and line references when possible. - For test or performance tasks, define the workload, success criteria, and measurement method. ## Checklist - Are assumptions and ownership boundaries explicit? - Are risky changes reversible or safely deployable? - Are observability and diagnostics sufficient for production issues? - Are tests or validation steps targeted to the actual risk? - Are security and data-integrity concerns addressed?
在 GitHub 查看