pia-threshold-screening

name	pia-threshold-screening
description	Conducts pre-DPIA threshold screening to determine whether a full Data Protection Impact Assessment is required under GDPR Article 35. Applies the EDPB WP248rev.01 nine-criteria test, national supervisory authority blacklists, and organisational risk appetite to produce a documented screening decision. Keywords: threshold screening, DPIA trigger, pre-DPIA, WP248, Article 35(1), blacklist, screening decision.
license	Apache-2.0
metadata	{"author":"mukul975","version":"1.0","domain":"privacy","subdomain":"privacy-impact-assessment","tags":"threshold-screening, dpia-trigger, pre-dpia, wp248, article-35, blacklist"}

PIA Threshold Screening

Overview

Article 35(1) GDPR requires a DPIA when processing is "likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons." This skill provides a structured screening methodology to make that determination before committing to a full DPIA.

Screening Criteria

EDPB Nine-Criteria Test (WP248rev.01)

Processing that meets two or more of the following criteria generally requires a DPIA:

#	Criterion	GDPR Reference
1	Evaluation or scoring	Art. 35(3)(a)
2	Automated decision-making with legal/similar effect	Art. 35(3)(a)
3	Systematic monitoring	Art. 35(3)(c)
4	Sensitive data or data of highly personal nature	Art. 9, Art. 10
5	Data processed on a large scale	Recital 91
6	Matching or combining datasets	WP248
7	Data concerning vulnerable data subjects	WP248
8	Innovative use or applying new technological solutions	WP248
9	Processing that prevents data subjects from exercising a right	Art. 22, Art. 35(3)(b)

Mandatory DPIA Triggers (Art. 35(3))

A DPIA is always required for:

• (a) Systematic and extensive evaluation of personal aspects based on automated processing, including profiling, producing legal effects or similarly significant effects
• (b) Large-scale processing of special categories of data (Art. 9(1)) or criminal conviction data (Art. 10)
• (c) Systematic monitoring of a publicly accessible area on a large scale

National Supervisory Authority Blacklists (Art. 35(4))

Each EU/EEA supervisory authority publishes a list of processing operations requiring a DPIA. The screening must check the relevant national blacklist based on the controller establishment.

Screening Process

1. Identify processing activity -- Describe the proposed or changed processing
2. Check mandatory triggers -- Evaluate against Art. 35(3)(a)-(c)
3. Check national blacklist -- Consult the relevant SA published list
4. Apply nine-criteria test -- Score each WP248 criterion as met/not met
5. Document rationale -- Record the screening decision with justification
6. Escalate or close -- Route to full DPIA or document exemption

Decision Logic

IF any Art. 35(3) mandatory trigger is met → DPIA REQUIRED
ELSE IF processing appears on national SA blacklist → DPIA REQUIRED
ELSE IF 2+ WP248 criteria are met → DPIA REQUIRED
ELSE IF 1 WP248 criterion is met → DPIA RECOMMENDED (risk-based decision)
ELSE → DPIA NOT REQUIRED (document exemption)

Integration Points

• RoPA linkage: Screening results attach to the corresponding RoPA entry
• Change management: New processing or material changes trigger re-screening
• DPIA register: Positive screening decisions feed the DPIA pipeline