Skip to main content

backlink-building:评估并协商外链邀约的回复

backlink-building 处理已经回复 Mentiohunt 外联的站点负责人。它核对站点与产品的相关性,理解对方提出的条件,建议接受、还价或拒绝,并起草回复供你确认。

来源信息

仓库
nahumoore/seo-agent-skills
最近来源活动
2026年9月16日 21:32
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
0
分支
0

用途

适合处理回复队列、客座文章协商、付费或互链要求,以及单个已经回复的机会;重点是收到首次回复后的协商。

必要前提

拉取实时机会需要连接 Mentiohunt MCP,源文档给出的配置入口是 https://mentiohunt.com/agents.txt。Skill 会先从项目或账号资料确认产品用途及实际能提供的交换条件。

操作说明

取得已有回复的机会,先查看对方页面,再阅读邮件线程并记录条件。结合主题相关性、内容质量、链接位置和交换要求,向你同时展示判断依据、建议及回复草稿。

限制

域名评级与 Mentiohunt 匹配分数只是线索,不能代替针对产品的判断;承诺的交换条件必须能够兑现。源文档要求每条消息发送前单独获得明确批准,发送后才更新机会状态。

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

文件资源管理器
3 个文件

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
backlink-building
description
Negotiate backlink placements with site owners who have replied to Mentiohunt outreach — checks whether their site is actually a good fit for the user's product, figures out what the owner wants in exchange for the link, and drafts a counter-offer (testimonial, reciprocal link, comped access, guest content, etc.) for the user to review before anything is sent. Use this whenever the user mentions Mentiohunt opportunities or replies, negotiating a guest post or link placement, a site owner asking for payment or something in exchange for a backlink, working through an outreach/prospect reply queue, or asks things like "what do these people want" or "check my opportunities."
# Backlink Negotiator Mentiohunt automates backlink discovery and outreach up through a prospect's first reply. Everything after that — reading what the site owner actually wants, deciding whether the site is worth it, and negotiating terms — is left to the user. This skill is that missing step. The core judgment call here isn't mechanical: a reply saying "sure, $150 for a dofollow link" means something different from a resource-page editor asking "can you also link back to us?" Read each thread for what's actually being asked, not just keywords, and treat the two reference files below as judgment aids, not lookup tables to pattern-match against. ## Workflow ### 1. Find the product being promoted Before anything else, work out what product/site this negotiation is for and what it can credibly offer a site owner (testimonials, a free/comped account, a reciprocal link, co-marketing, guest content, etc.). Get this from context, not from the user: 1. Check the current working directory / codebase first — a README, `package.json` description, marketing copy, docs, or landing page usually says what the product is and who it's for. 2. If that's not conclusive, query the Mentiohunt MCP tools for account and product data (account details, tracked products/sites, tracked pages). If Mentiohunt's MCP tools aren't loaded yet, they're likely deferred — search for them (e.g. `ToolSearch` with a query like "mentiohunt") before concluding they're unavailable. If no Mentiohunt MCP connection exists at all, tell the user to set one up per `https://mentiohunt.com/agents.txt` before you can pull live opportunities. 3. Only if both of those come up empty, ask the user directly for a short product description, target audience, and what they're able to offer site owners in return for a link. Don't skip to step 3 just because step 1 takes an extra look around the filesystem — that's the whole point of trying it first. ### 2. Pull opportunities with a live reply Use the Mentiohunt MCP read-only tools to fetch opportunities that already have a reply from the site owner (not brand-new or merely-contacted ones — those don't need negotiation yet). Filter by product and status where the tools support it. If the user asked about a specific domain or opportunity, just fetch that one. ### 3. Check whether the site is actually a good fit Mentiohunt's own domain rating and fit score are a starting signal, not the final word — they're generic, not scored against this specific product. For each opportunity, fetch the actual prospect page (and the surrounding site if the page alone doesn't tell you enough) and judge: - **Topical relevance** — would this product's actual target audience plausibly read this page? - **Editorial quality** — real editorial content and engaged audience, versus thin/templated pages, obvious PBN or link-farm patterns (rotating outbound links, no real content, disconnected niches). - **Placement type** — a resource page, roundup, directory listing, and guest post all carry different effort/value tradeoffs; factor that in alongside the DR. Form your own view here before reading the reply — you want to know whether this is worth pursuing *before* you get anchored on what the owner is asking for. ### 4. Read the thread and work out the actual ask The reply thread is free text — there's no field that says "wants: $150." Read it and classify what's being requested: a flat payment, a paid guest post, a reciprocal link back, a product mention/swap, a flat refusal of free placements, or something else. Note the exact terms (price, conditions, deadline) if any are given. ### 5. Decide: accept, counter, or decline Weigh the fit assessment from step 3 against the ask from step 4. Read `references/negotiation-rubric.md` for how to combine these into a recommendation — it covers cases like a strong-fit site asking for a reasonable non-cash exchange (usually accept), a weak-fit site asking for payment (usually decline), and the murkier cases in between where the right call depends on how much the placement is actually worth to this product. ### 6. Pick what to pitch If the answer isn't a plain yes, decide what to offer instead of or alongside it. Read `references/pitch-menu.md` for options (testimonials, reciprocal links, comped access, co-marketing, guest content, expert quotes/data) and guidance on which tend to land with which type of site. Only pitch things the product can actually deliver — check back against what step 1 established. ### 7. Draft the reply Write a reply email that: - Responds directly to what they asked for, rather than a generic template. - References something specific from their site or their message, so it doesn't read as a form letter. - Matches their tone (a casual blogger and a formal editor warrant different registers). - States the counter-offer plainly if there is one. ### 8. Always stop for approval before sending Present the fetched context, your fit assessment, the interpreted ask, your recommendation with reasoning, and the drafted reply to the user. Do not call a send/reply tool (e.g. `send_prospect_reply`) on your own initiative under any circumstances — sending contacts a real person and can't be undone, so it needs explicit per-message approval every time, even if the user approved a similar message earlier in the session. Once the user approves and you send it, update the opportunity's status via the Mentiohunt MCP tool to reflect the outcome (e.g. negotiating, accepted, declined).
在 GitHub 查看