菜单
Use when compressing a candidate's narrative into a structured EvidenceCard. Teaches the agent the field semantics, what counts as a critical_incident vs resume_claim, and when to mark insufficiency.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use when interviewing a candidate. Teaches the agent to drive the dialogue around concrete critical incidents rather than abstract self-assessment, and to chase one missing cue per turn.
Use when naming a cognitive mechanism from evidence cards. Teaches the agent what counts as a high-value mechanism vs a soft-skill cliché, and how to express it as a four-part pattern.
Use when coordinating the seven-stage extraction pipeline. Tells the Orchestrator when to delegate, when to gate, when to escalate.
Use when composing the final extraction_report. Teaches how to write candidate-usable resume rewrites and interview narratives, separating validated mechanisms from probable ones.
Use when reviewing a proposed mechanism for flaws. The Skeptic does NOT propose new mechanisms — only stress-tests existing ones with a fixed checklist of bias patterns.
| name | evidence-schema |
| description | Use when compressing a candidate's narrative into a structured EvidenceCard. Teaches the agent the field semantics, what counts as a critical_incident vs resume_claim, and when to mark insufficiency. |
| when_to_use | Triggered by the Evidence Mapper agent after each interview turn or at end of intake. |
| 字段 | 含义 | 抽取规则 |
|---|---|---|
situation | 当时的情境, 一句话 | 用候选人原话提炼, 不加修饰词 |
goal | 候选人当时想达成的目标 | 必须是当时的目标, 不是事后的目标 |
constraints | 当时存在的硬约束 | 列出 1-4 个, 时间/资源/合规/组织依赖 |
cues | 候选人观察到的、用于判断的信号 | 这是最重要的字段; 如果空白, 应标 insufficiency |
judgment | 候选人当时的因果解释 | 一句话: "我当时认为 X, 因为看到 Y" |
actions | 实际做的动作, 按时间顺序 | 列出 2-5 步; 不要写"沟通"这种动词, 要写具体动作 |
outcome | 实际结果 | 写客观结果, 不写"很成功" |
confidence | 这张卡的可信度 | 见下表 |
| 值 | 触发条件 |
|---|---|
critical_incident | 来自对话中讲述的具体一次事件, 有时间、有动作 |
resume_claim | 仅来自简历, 没有对话佐证 |
self_assessment | 候选人对自己的笼统评价, 无具体事件 |
| 分数 | 触发条件 |
|---|---|
| 0.80–0.95 | critical_incident, cues + judgment + actions + outcome 齐全 |
| 0.60–0.79 | critical_incident, 缺 1 项关键字段 |
| 0.40–0.59 | resume_claim, 但与对话能粗略对上 |
| 0.20–0.39 | self_assessment 或大量缺口 |
| <0.20 | 几乎只有标签 |
只要 confidence < 0.6, 必须填一个简短理由, 例如:
"missing_cues" — 候选人没说看到什么信号"outcome_unclear" — 不知道结果如何"attribution_ambiguous" — 分不清是个人贡献还是团队"self_assessment_only" — 只有自评source_ref.conversation_turn_ids 必须能回指到真实的 turn id