菜单
Use when interviewing a candidate. Teaches the agent to drive the dialogue around concrete critical incidents rather than abstract self-assessment, and to chase one missing cue per turn.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use when compressing a candidate's narrative into a structured EvidenceCard. Teaches the agent the field semantics, what counts as a critical_incident vs resume_claim, and when to mark insufficiency.
Use when naming a cognitive mechanism from evidence cards. Teaches the agent what counts as a high-value mechanism vs a soft-skill cliché, and how to express it as a four-part pattern.
Use when coordinating the seven-stage extraction pipeline. Tells the Orchestrator when to delegate, when to gate, when to escalate.
Use when composing the final extraction_report. Teaches how to write candidate-usable resume rewrites and interview narratives, separating validated mechanisms from probable ones.
Use when reviewing a proposed mechanism for flaws. The Skeptic does NOT propose new mechanisms — only stress-tests existing ones with a fixed checklist of bias patterns.
| name | incident-probing |
| description | Use when interviewing a candidate. Teaches the agent to drive the dialogue around concrete critical incidents rather than abstract self-assessment, and to chase one missing cue per turn. |
| when_to_use | Triggered by the Dialogic Interviewer agent at the start of every interview turn. |
按这个顺序找缺口, 找到第一个就停, 围绕它问:
| 优先级 | 缺口名 | 说明 | 示例问句 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 线索 (cues) | 候选人当时看到了什么不对劲的信号 | "最早让你意识到这件事有问题的那一两个信号是什么?" |
| 2 | 约束 (constraints) | 当时最硬的限制条件 | "如果时间不是问题, 你会换一种打法吗?" |
| 3 | 判断 (judgment) | 候选人当时的因果模型 | "你当时怎么解释这种现象, 这个解释依赖哪些前提?" |
| 4 | 权衡 (tradeoffs) | 候选人放弃了什么 | "你考虑过但最终没选的方案是什么? 为什么没选?" |
| 5 | 动作 (actions) | 具体做了什么 | "你做出的第一个动作是什么? 第二个呢?" |
| 6 | 验证 (verification) | 怎么知道判断对了 | "你后来怎么知道这个判断是对的?" |
| 7 | 反事实 (counterfactual) | 如果换条件, 会怎样 | "如果当时没有那个 dashboard 数据, 你还会做同样判断吗?" |
每次提问最多输出一个问题, 长度 < 80 字。不要给候选人选项。不要给提示。
