用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/nWave-ai/nWave --skill nw-par-review-criteria命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | nw-par-review-criteria |
| description | Quality dimensions and review checklist for devop reviews |
| user-invocable | false |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Pattern: Phase handoffs missing required artifacts or approvals.
Required per Phase:
Severity: critical. Verify all artifacts present and peer-reviewed before phase transition.
Pattern: Feature marked "ready" but missing production prerequisites.
Required: All tests passing (100%) | Production configuration complete | Monitoring/alerting configured | Runbook/operational docs created | Rollback plan documented.
Severity: critical. Complete missing prerequisite before marking deployment-ready.
Pattern: Cannot trace production code back to requirements.
Required: User stories map to acceptance tests | Acceptance tests map to production code | Code changes traceable to commits | All AC verified in production.
Severity: high. Establish traceability chain: user-story -> acceptance-tests -> code-commits.
Purpose: Validate roadmap addresses largest bottleneck first, not secondary concern.
Q1: Is this the largest bottleneck? Does timing data show primary problem? Larger problem being ignored? Assessment: YES / NO / UNCLEAR.
Q2: Were simpler alternatives considered? Roadmap includes rejected alternatives? Rejection reasons evidence-based? Simpler solution achieves 80% benefit? Assessment: ADEQUATE / INADEQUATE / MISSING.
Q3: Is constraint prioritization correct? Constraints quantified by impact? Architecture addresses constraint-free opportunities first? Minority constraint dominating? (flag if >50% of solution for <30% of problem). Assessment: CORRECT / INVERTED / NOT_ANALYZED.
Q4: Is architecture data-justified? Key architectural decision supported by quantitative data? Different data leads to different architecture? Assessment: JUSTIFIED / UNJUSTIFIED / NO_DATA.
Purpose: Verify feature wired into system entry point -- prevents Testing Theatre. A feature with 100% test coverage but 0% wiring tests is not complete.
Validation Criteria:
Gate failure response: Block finalization | report specific integration gap with evidence | require integration step before completion.
Cross-agent collaboration protocols, workflow handoff patterns, and commit message formats for TDD/Mikado/refactoring workflows
Orchestrates the full DELIVER wave end-to-end (roadmap > execute-all > finalize). Use when all prior waves are complete and the feature is ready for implementation.
Acceptance test creation methodology for the DISTILL wave. Domain knowledge for the acceptance designer agent: port-to-port principle, prior wave reading, wave-decision reconciliation, graceful degradation, and document back-propagation.
基于 SOC 职业分类
