菜单
Reviews documentation for voice, style, and structure alignment with Outfitter standards. Use when reviewing docs, checking content quality, or when "review this doc", "voice check", "style review", or "is this ready?" are mentioned.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/outfitter-dev/agents-internal --skill docs-review命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Documentation for AI agents — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, and agent-readable content patterns. Use when creating agent entry points, structuring .claude/ directories, or when "CLAUDE.md", "AGENTS.md", "agent documentation", "machine-readable", or "writing for agents" are mentioned. Covers both configuration and content patterns for agent consumption.
Rigorous quality gate for documentation before merge or publish. Verifies code examples run, links resolve, APIs match implementation, and all sections are complete. Use when auditing docs, reviewing documentation PRs, or when "verify", "quality gate", "docs audit", or "check examples" is mentioned.
Project documentation structure and templates — READMEs, API docs, guides, and CLI references. Use when creating documentation, structuring a docs/ directory, writing READMEs, or when "documentation", "README", "API docs", "docs structure", or "guides" are mentioned. Pair with styleguide for writing craft; apply voice as a review pass.
正在显示 SKILL.md
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | docs-review |
| description | Reviews documentation for voice, style, and structure alignment with Outfitter standards. Use when reviewing docs, checking content quality, or when "review this doc", "voice check", "style review", or "is this ready?" are mentioned. |
| context | fork |
| agent | editor |
| metadata | {"version":"1.0.0","author":"outfitter"} |
Review the current document against Outfitter standards for voice, style, and structure.
$ARGUMENTS
If direction is provided above, focus on that specific aspect. Otherwise, perform a general review across all dimensions.
Does it sound like Outfitter?
Is the craft right?
Does it follow documentation patterns?
Provide your review in this format:
Status: Ready | Needs Work
Summary: One sentence overall assessment.
Issues (if any):
Strengths:
If the document is ready, say so briefly. If it needs work, be specific about locations and fixes.
