| name | rabbitmq-patterns |
| description | RabbitMQ patterns — exchanges, queues, routing, dead letter queues, priority queues, clustering. Use when working with rabbitmq patterns. |
| domain | development |
| author | oyi77 |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| subdomain | software-development |
| tags | ["coding","patterns","rabbitmq","software-engineering","testing"] |
| version | 1.0.0 |
Overview
Design and operate RabbitMQ — exchange types, queue bindings, dead letter handling, priority queues, publisher confirms, and clustering.
Capabilities
- Exchange types (direct, fanout, topic, headers)
- Queue management and bindings
- Dead letter queues
- Priority queues
- Publisher confirms
- Consumer acknowledgments
- Clustering and high availability
When to Use
Trigger phrases:
-
"rabbitmq patterns"
-
"RabbitMQ patterns — exchanges, queues, routing, dead letter queues, priority que"
-
Task queue / background job processing
-
Request-reply patterns
-
Pub/sub messaging
-
Message routing with complex rules
-
Reliable message delivery
When NOT to Use
- Task is about deployment, not development (use deploy skills)
- Task is about code review, not writing (use review skills)
- You need to understand existing code first (use research skills)
- Task is about testing only (use test skills)
- Requirements are unclear (clarify first)
- Task is trivially simple (single line fix)
Pseudo Code
The rabbitmq-patterns workflow follows a standard pipeline pattern.
Core flow:
# rabbitmq-patterns primary flow
input = prepare(raw_data)
result = process(input, config={clustering, dead, exchanges, letter, patterns})
validate(result)
deliver(result)
Error handling:
on error:
log(error_details)
retry_with_backoff(max=3)
if still_failing: alert_and_escalate()
Setup (Node.js with amqplib)
import amqplib from 'amqplib'
const conn = await amqplib.connect('amqp://localhost')
const ch = await conn.createChannel()
await ch.assertExchange('events', 'topic', { durable: true })
await ch.assertQueue('order-processing', {
durable: true,
deadLetterExchange: 'dlx',
deadLetterRoutingKey: 'dead.order',
messageTtl: 60000,
maxLength: 10000,
})
await ch.bindQueue('order-processing', 'events', 'order.*')
Publish with Confirm
await ch.assertExchange('events', 'topic', { durable: true })
await ch.publish('events', 'order.created', Buffer.from(JSON.stringify(order)), {
persistent: true,
correlationId: orderId,
timestamp: Date.now(),
})
const confirmed = await ch.waitForConfirms()
Consume with Acknowledgment
await ch.consume('order-processing', async (msg) => {
try {
const order = JSON.parse(msg.content.toString())
await processOrder(order)
ch.ack(msg)
} catch (err) {
ch.nack(msg, false, false)
}
})
Topic Routing
await ch.bindQueue('order-service', 'events', 'order.*')
await ch.bindQueue('payment-alerts', 'events', 'payment.failed')
await ch.bindQueue('audit-log', 'events', '#')
Priority Queue
await ch.assertQueue('priority-tasks', {
durable: true,
maxPriority: 10,
})
await ch.publish('', 'priority-tasks', Buffer.from(msg), {
priority: 9,
})
Dead Letter Queue Processing
await ch.assertExchange('dlx', 'direct', { durable: true })
await ch.assertQueue('dead-letters', { durable: true })
await ch.bindQueue('dead-letters', 'dlx', 'dead.order')
await ch.consume('dead-letters', async (msg) => {
console.error('Dead letter:', JSON.parse(msg.content.toString()))
ch.ack(msg)
})
Common Patterns
- Work queue: Competing consumers for task distribution
- Pub/sub fanout: Broadcast events to all subscribers
- Topic routing: Route by pattern (order., payment.)
- Dead letter queue: Capture failed messages for analysis
- Priority queue: Process urgent messages first
- Publisher confirms: Ensure messages are persisted
How to Use
- Understand the requirement and existing codebase patterns
- Design the solution with error handling and testability in mind
- Implement incrementally with tests for each change
- Verify against expected outcomes (manual and automated)
- Document usage, edge cases, and integration points
- Review with team before merging to shared branches
Red Flags
- Skipping tests to ship faster: Untested code breaks in production when you least expect it
- No error handling in production code: Unhandled errors crash services and lose user data
- Hardcoded configuration values: Hardcoded values prevent environment switching and leak secrets
- Ignoring security implications: Missing input validation, auth bypasses, and injection vulnerabilities
- Over-engineering simple solutions: Premature abstraction adds complexity without proportional benefit
Verification
Process
- Analyze the task requirements
- Apply domain expertise
- Verify output quality
Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|
| "Tests slow me down" | Bugs slow you down 10x more. Tests are speed, not overhead. |
| "I will refactor later" | Technical debt compounds. Refactor as you go. |
| "It works on my machine" | If it is not in CI, it does not work. Ship proof, not claims. |