- name
- conductor-revert
- compatibility
- opencode
- completeness
- 95
- content-types
- ["guidance","examples","do-dont"]
- description
- Implements intelligent conductor revert with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
- license
- MIT
- maturity
- stable
- metadata
- {"domain":"agent","output-format":"analysis","related-skills":"agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing","role":"orchestration","scope":"orchestration","triggers":"conductor-revert, conductor revert, how do i conductor-revert, orchestrate conductor-revert, automate conductor-revert, agent conductor-revert","archetypes":["orchestration","strategic"],"anti_triggers":["brainstorming","vague ideation","single-agent monolith"],"response_profile":{"verbosity":"medium","directive_strength":"high","abstraction_level":"tactical"}}
- version
- 1.0.0
# Conductor Revert
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for conductor revert workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```python
class ConductorRevertOrchestrator:
def __init__(self, revert_strategies: List[Dict], audit_logger: Logger):
self.strategies = revert_strategies
self.logger = audit_logger
self.confidence_cache = {}
def route_revert_request(self, request: Dict) -> Dict:
# Law 1: Early exit on invalid revert request
if not request.get("target_component") or not request.get("revert_version"):
raise ValueError("Revert request missing target_component or revert_version")
# Law 2: Parse & validate revert scope
scope = self._parse_revert_scope(request)
scored_strategies = self._score_revert_strategies(scope)
# Law 3: Atomic selection - return new dict, never mutate inputs
selected = max(scored_strategies, key=lambda s: s["match_score"])
if selected["match_score"] < 0.7:
return self._trigger_fallback_chain(scope, selected)
selected["execution_plan"] = self._build_revert_plan(selected)
self.logger.info(f"Selected revert strategy: {selected['name']} (score: {selected['match_score']})")
return selected
def _score_revert_strategies(self, scope: Dict) -> List[Dict]:
scores = []
for strategy in self.strategies:
# Multi-factor scoring: compatibility, historical success, system load
compat = self._calculate_component_compatibility(scope["target_component"], strategy)
history = self.confidence_cache.get(strategy["name"], 0.8)
load_penalty = 0.1 if strategy.get("system_load", 0) > 0.8 else 0.0
match_score = (compat * 0.5) + (history * 0.3) + ((1.0 - load_penalty) * 0.2)
scores.append({**strategy, "match_score": round(match_score, 3)})
return scores
def _trigger_fallback_chain(self, scope: Dict, failed_strategy: Dict) -> Dict:
# Fallback 1: Retry with degraded mode
degraded = {**failed_strategy, "mode": "degraded", "fallback_level": 1}
self.logger.warning(f"Primary revert failed, applying fallback 1: {degraded['name']}")
return degraded
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```python
def execute_revert_with_resilience(self, selected_strategy: Dict, revert_context: Dict) -> Dict:
# Law 4: Fail fast on invalid revert state
if not self._validate_revert_state(revert_context):
raise RevertStateError("Cannot revert: target component is in inconsistent state")
max_attempts = selected_strategy.get("max_retries", 2)
for attempt in range(max_attempts + 1):
try:
# Execute domain-specific revert logic
revert_result = self._apply_revert_strategy(selected_strategy, revert_context)
# Verify revert integrity (Law 3: Atomic Predictability)
if self._verify_revert_integrity(revert_context, revert_result):
self._update_confidence(selected_strategy["name"], success=True)
return {
"status": "reverted",
"strategy": selected_strategy["name"],
"attempts": attempt + 1,
"timestamp": time.time()
}
except TransientDependencyError as e:
if attempt == max_attempts:
return self._escalate_to_manual_intervention(selected_strategy, revert_context)
continue
except IrreversibleStateError as e:
# Law 4: Fail loud, no silent patches
self.logger.error(f"Irreversible state during revert: {e}")
return self._trigger_fallback_chain(revert_context, selected_strategy)
# All retries exhausted
return self._trigger_fallback_chain(revert_context, selected_strategy)
def _verify_revert_integrity(self, context: Dict, result: Dict) -> bool:
# Domain-specific verification: check component version, config hash, and dependency health
expected_version = context["revert_version"]
actual_version = result.get("component_version")
config_hash_valid = result.get("config_hash") == context["target_config_hash"]
deps_healthy = all(dep["status"] == "healthy" for dep in result.get("dependencies", []))
return actual_version == expected_version and config_hash_valid and deps_healthy
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
---
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Parse user request into structured task specifications before dispatching to downstream agents
- Implement a state machine for each conductor phase with explicit entry/exit conditions and transition logs
- Validate revert outputs against expected schema before proceeding to the next orchestration step
- Log every orchestration decision including rationale, selected strategy, and confidence scores for auditability
- Maintain a task queue with priority ordering — critical path items execute first during resource contention
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not allow a single failed agent task to silently terminate the entire workflow — implement per-step fallbacks
- Avoid circular delegation patterns where Agent A delegates to B which delegates back to A without termination condition
- Never bypass the validation step for revert results even if timing is critical — correctness supersedes speed
- Do not use shared mutable state between parallel agent executions — use message-passing or immutable data transfer
- Avoid hardcoding agent selection rules; parameterize them and load from configuration for runtime flexibility
## Live References
> Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- [Git Revert vs Reset Guide (Atlassian)](<https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/resetting-checking-out-and-reverting>)
- [Rollback Patterns for Microservices](<https://microservices.io/patterns/rollback.html>)
- [Blue-Green Deployment Strategy](<https://martinfowler.com/bliki/BlueGreenDeployment.html>)
- [Database Migration Rollback Strategies](<https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/devopses/blog/how-to-roll-back-database-migrations>)
- [Change Management Best Practices (ITIL)](<https://axelos.com/certifications/itil-service-management>)
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|
在 GitHub 查看