菜单
Use when a design decision needs a cautious cognitive rationale involving Gestalt grouping, affordances, memory, attention, mental models, or bias. Do not use as proof of user behaviour or for heuristic inspection; route claims to research/testing or heuristic evaluation.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/peterbamuhigire/design-system-skills --skill ux-psychology命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | ux-psychology |
| description | Use when a design decision needs a cautious cognitive rationale involving Gestalt grouping, affordances, memory, attention, mental models, or bias. Do not use as proof of user behaviour or for heuristic inspection; route claims to research/testing or heuristic evaluation. |
| metadata | {"portable":true,"category":"05-ux-process-research-and-psychology","compatible_with":["claude-code","codex"]} |
Acknowledgement: Shared by Peter Bamuhigire, techguypeter.com, +256 784 464178.
05-ux-process-research-and-psychology/ux-research-and-usability-testing.05-ux-process-research-and-psychology/heuristic-evaluation-and-design-critique (this skill supplies its psychology vocabulary, not the critique format).04-web-and-ui-design/distinctive-by-design, interaction-design-patterns, or motion-design.| Input | Source | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| User task, context, and consequence | Research or approved brief | Observed behaviour or clearly labelled assumptions |
| Interface/flow under consideration | Stable design or build | Versioned screen and decision point |
| Competing design hypotheses | Design/product team | Alternatives and predicted cognitive effect |
| Condition | Choice | Wrong-choice failure |
|---|---|---|
| Claim concerns likely comprehension | Use principle as hypothesis, then test | Psychology is treated as deterministic proof |
| Many items must be scanned | Meaningful chunking and progressive disclosure | Arbitrary limits hide necessary information |
| Control meaning is unfamiliar | Visible signifier, label, and feedback | Minimalism creates invisible affordances |
| Output | Consumer | Evidence and acceptance |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive design rationale | Product and design | Principle, observed issue, hypothesis, alternative, and limitation are explicit |
| Validation plan | Research and QA | Task, participants/evidence, predicted result, and disconfirmation signal are defined |
SKILL.md as the portable execution layer for both Claude Code and Codex.examples/psychology-critique-worked.md — a worked critique of one real screen (a coffee-subscription checkout) through named psychology lenses: Gestalt grouping, Nielsen's heuristics, Norman's affordances/signifiers, cognitive load (Miller/Sweller), and Hick's/Fitts's law. Each finding pairs the principle with the design change it implies; ends with a findings-to-changes table.doctrine/design-doctrine.md — the Mission and Anti-Slop Charter; psychological quality is part of looking deliberately human-made, not templated.doctrine/references/ai-slop-taxonomy.md — the interface/product slop tells whose cognitive cost this skill explains.04-web-and-ui-design/distinctive-by-design, 04-web-and-ui-design/interaction-design-patterns, 08-motion-and-interaction/motion-design.references/legacy-guidance.md — Gestalt, Nielsen, Norman, Krug; + working-memory rules + four-stage cognitive affordance (added 2026-05-04). Read only the specific files under references/ that match the task.references/three-paradigms-of-hci.md — Building / HIP / Design Thinking; cockpit-voice example for stakeholder alignmentreferences/three-levels-of-ux-scope.md — Single Interaction / Journey / Relationship — declare in every proposal