meta-lead-scoring

name	meta-lead-scoring
description	Use when designing and calibrating explicit, behavioural and decay rules with sales. Produces lead-scoring model and handover thresholds; use `meta-sales-marketing-alignment` when that neighbouring contract is the closer match.
metadata	{"portable":true,"compatible_with":["claude-code","codex"]}

Lead Scoring Playbook

Use When

• Use this skill for designing and calibrating explicit, behavioural and decay rules with sales.
• Confirm that meta-sales-marketing-alignment is not the closer route before proceeding.

Do Not Use When

• Use meta-sales-marketing-alignment when its narrower output is requested.
• Do not publish, spend, change a live account, certify compliance, or invent missing client evidence.

Required Inputs

Artefact	Source/provider	Required?	If absent
Historical lead outcomes, crm fields and sales capacity	Client, approved systems, or dated platform exports	Yes	Stop the affected decision; request it or mark the field unknown and narrow the output.
Purpose, audience and approval boundary	Client brief or accountable owner	Yes	Return discovery questions; do not infer approval.

Outputs

Artefact	Consumer	Acceptance condition
Lead-scoring model and handover thresholds	Client lead and next workflow owner	Every recommendation traces to an input, names an owner or next action, and marks assumptions and unassessed checks.

Evidence Produced

Evidence	Format	Acceptance condition
Decision and source register	Table in the deliverable	Each material claim records its source/date or is labelled unverified; missing evidence never becomes a pass.

Capability and permission boundary

Read and search access to the supplied artefacts are required; calculation or file-rendering capability is optional. Planning and drafting are read-only with respect to client accounts and source records. Editing the deliverable requires explicit authorisation; publishing, production mutation, destructive action, spend, and certification claims require separate explicit authority and evidence.

Degraded mode

If files, platform access, network, rendering, fonts, or calculation tools are unavailable, return the narrowest useful qualified lead-scoring model and handover thresholds. Mark each blocked check not assessed, state the consequence, and provide the exact evidence needed to resume. Never convert an unavailable check into a pass.

Decision rules

Choice	Action	Failure or risk avoided
Historical lead outcomes, crm fields and sales capacity is current and attributable	Produce the full lead-scoring model and handover thresholds and cite the evidence used.	Decisions based on stale or unrelated evidence.
A material input is missing or contradictory	Stop that decision, request clarification, or issue a labelled partial result.	Fabricated precision and false confidence.
The requested outcome belongs to meta-sales-marketing-alignment	Route there and hand over the verified inputs already collected.	Neighbour collision and duplicated work.

Workflow

1. Confirm the requested decision, consumer, market, period and permission boundary; route to meta-sales-marketing-alignment if its contract is closer.
2. Inventory the required inputs and their provenance. Stop any decision whose critical evidence is absent; recover by requesting it or recording a bounded assumption.
3. Apply the domain method in the core sections below, following the decision table whenever evidence conflicts or scope changes.
4. Verify calculations, dates, named platforms and claims against the supplied sources; label inference and uncertainty.
5. Produce the lead-scoring model and handover thresholds, decision/source register and explicit next owner. Do not mutate live systems without separate authority.
6. Run the repository anti-slop ship gate. If a blocking factual, permission or evidence defect remains, fix it or withhold release.

Quality Standards

The output is client-specific, uses British English and the stated market/currency, distinguishes observed fact from inference, exposes gaps, and gives a checkable acceptance condition. Recommendations must be feasible within the confirmed budget, capacity and permissions.

Anti-Patterns

• Using an undated benchmark as the client's result. Fix: use account evidence or label the benchmark as a provisional comparator.
• Producing the lead-scoring model and handover thresholds without historical lead outcomes. Fix: stop the affected decision or issue a clearly bounded partial output.
• Treating missing access or data as a successful check. Fix: record not assessed, its risk and the recovery input.
• Absorbing meta-sales-marketing-alignment into this workflow. Fix: route the neighbouring output and hand over verified inputs.
• Publishing, spending or editing a live account during planning or review. Fix: obtain separate explicit authority and retain action evidence.

Worked example

Given verified historical lead outcomes, the skill produces a lead-scoring model and handover thresholds with source dates and named assumptions. If that evidence cannot be accessed, it returns only the supported sections plus a recovery list; it does not fill gaps with East African defaults.

Read next

• meta-sales-marketing-alignment for the neighbouring contract.
• anti-ai-slop during production.
• ai-slop-audit at the release checkpoint.

References

• Anti-AI slop production gate
• Follow the directly linked repository skills above and any domain references named in the core sections below. Verify current platform, price, legal and regulatory claims before use.

Required Inputs

Ask for the following before generating any output:

1. Business name — trading name of the client
2. Industry — sector and niche
3. Country / city — default is Uganda/East Africa
4. Primary goal — what lead scoring must achieve (prioritise sales follow-up, demonstrate marketing ROI, reduce sales team time wasted on unqualified leads, improve conversion rate)
5. Ideal customer profile — describe the best customers in terms of company size, role, industry, location, and budget level (for B2B) or demographic and behaviour (for B2C)
6. Sales team capacity — how many qualified lead conversations the sales team can manage per week
7. Current CRM or contact management tool — what system stores lead data (spreadsheet, CRM, email platform)
8. Available data — what information is currently captured for each lead at the point of entry

---

What Lead Scoring Is

Lead scoring is a numerical model that assigns point values to leads based on two dimensions:

• Explicit attributes — who the lead is (demographic and firmographic characteristics)
• Implicit behaviours — what the lead has done (signals of intent and engagement)

A lead whose total score crosses a defined threshold is forwarded to the sales team for immediate follow-up. A lead below the threshold re-enters the nurture sequence and accumulates score over time through further engagement. This ensures that the sales team's time is spent on the highest-probability buyers — not distributed equally across every contact regardless of intent.

---

Explicit Scoring Criteria (Demographic / Firmographic)

These criteria describe the lead's fit with the ideal customer profile. A perfect explicit score indicates the lead looks like the best existing customers.

B2B scoring model:

Criterion	Condition	Points
Job title / authority	Director, owner, or MD	20
	Manager or department head	10
	Executive or coordinator	5
	Unknown	0
Company size	Within target range	20
	Adjacent (slightly outside range)	10
	Outside target range	0
Industry	Primary target sector	20
	Secondary sector	10
	Out of scope	−10
Budget indication	Confirmed budget aligned to pricing	30
	Estimated budget in range	15
	No indication	0
Location	Within service geography	10
	Outside service geography	−5

B2C scoring model (adapt as required):

Criterion	Condition	Points
Age range	Primary target demographic	15
	Adjacent demographic	5
	Outside demographic	0
Income or spending level	High-value segment	20
	Mid-range segment	10
	Budget segment (if out of scope)	−5
Location	Target city or region	10
	Outside target region	−5

Customise both models for the client's specific ideal customer profile. Do not apply the template without adapting the criteria to the client's actual product, pricing, and geography.

---

Implicit Scoring Criteria (Behavioural)

These criteria measure what the lead has done. Behavioural signals are more powerful predictors of conversion than demographic fit alone — a contact who has visited the pricing page twice in one week is more likely to buy than a perfectly profiled lead who has never engaged with any content.

Behaviour	Points	Rationale
Downloaded a lead magnet	10	Showed enough interest to exchange contact details
Attended a webinar or live event	20	High-intent action; invested time in the brand
Visited the pricing page (if trackable)	25	The single strongest behavioural signal available
Opened 3 or more emails in the nurture sequence	15	Consistent engagement with content
Clicked a link in an email	10	Moved beyond passive reading to active interest
Replied to an email or WhatsApp message	20	Initiated a two-way conversation
Visited the website 3 or more times in 7 days	20	Research behaviour indicates active consideration
Requested a consultation, quote, or call	40	Explicit buying signal — highest single behavioural score
Shared content or referred another contact	15	Advocacy behaviour; high engagement
Attended an in-person event or demo	25	Significant time and interest investment

---

Score Decay

Apply score decay to prevent stale leads retaining artificially high scores. A lead who was highly engaged six months ago but has not opened an email or visited the website since is not a hot prospect — they are a disengaged contact who should be in a re-engagement sequence, not on the sales team's priority list.

Decay rule: Deduct 10 points from the lead's score for every 30 days of inactivity.

Inactivity Period	Score Deduction
30 days	−10 points
60 days	−20 points
90 days	−30 points (trigger re-engagement sequence)
120 days	−40 points (review for list removal)

In practice, apply score decay as a monthly batch update. Most CRM tools and email platforms support automated score adjustment based on inactivity rules.

---

Threshold Calibration with Sales

Do not set the scoring threshold in isolation. The threshold must be agreed with the sales team before the model goes live — and reviewed after 60 days of operation.

Calibration process:

1. Propose an initial threshold (recommended starting point: 60 points out of a maximum of approximately 175 points in a standard B2B model)
2. Run the model for 60 days without adjusting the threshold
3. At the 60-day review, ask the sales team:
   • Are the leads arriving above the threshold genuinely qualified?
   • Are there leads below the threshold that the sales team considers worth pursuing?
   • What is the conversion rate of threshold-crossing leads compared with the previous period?
4. Adjust the threshold up or down based on the answers
5. Repeat the review at 90 days and then quarterly

The scoring model is not a formula — it is a calibration conversation between marketing and sales, mediated by data. A model that marketing imposes on the sales team without their input will be ignored.

---

BANT Qualification Layer

Apply BANT as a secondary qualification check for all leads that cross the scoring threshold. A lead with a high score that fails BANT should be returned to nurture, not forwarded to sales.

BANT framework:

Dimension	Question	Signal
Budget	Has the lead indicated or implied a budget that aligns with the product pricing?	Confirmed = pass; absent = enquire before forwarding
Authority	Is this person a decision-maker or a recommender?	Decision-maker = pass; recommender = flag for multi-stakeholder approach
Need	Is there a stated or clearly implied business problem this product or service addresses?	Explicit need = pass; vague interest = return to nurture
Timeframe	Is there a defined decision date, a project deadline, or an urgency signal?	Defined timeframe = pass; open-ended = lower priority

A lead that crosses the scoring threshold and passes all four BANT dimensions is a Marketing Qualified Lead (MQL) — ready for sales handover. Document the BANT assessment in the CRM record at the point of handover.

---

East Africa Application

For most EA clients — particularly SMEs with limited CRM data — a simple scoring model with five to eight criteria is more effective than a complex one. Begin with the four highest-signal behaviours and add criteria as data quality improves.

Recommended starter model for EA clients:

Criterion	Points
Attended a webinar or live event	20
Visited the pricing page	25
Replied to a WhatsApp message or email	20
Requested a consultation or quote	40
Suggested threshold	40 points

At a threshold of 40 points, a single consultation request triggers immediate sales follow-up — as it should. Two or more moderate signals in combination also cross the threshold. Review and expand the model at the 60-day calibration.

---

Output: Lead Scoring Design Document

Generate the following for the client:

1. Explicit scoring table — customised to the client's ideal customer profile; all criteria and point values documented
2. Implicit scoring table — behavioural criteria relevant to the client's channels and content types
3. Score decay rule — stated clearly with monthly deduction schedule
4. Initial threshold recommendation — with rationale
5. 60-day calibration protocol — questions for the sales review meeting and adjustment methodology
6. BANT qualification checklist — to be completed by the sales team for every lead crossing the threshold
7. CRM implementation notes — how to configure scoring in the client's existing tool (or recommendation for a simple spreadsheet model if no CRM is in use)
8. Monthly review report template — lead score distribution, threshold crossings, MQL-to-deal conversion rate

---

Quality Criteria

Output meets the standard when:

1. Scoring model is built collaboratively with the client's sales team — the threshold and criteria are agreed, not imposed by marketing alone
2. Both explicit (demographic or firmographic) and implicit (behavioural) criteria are included in the model — a model with only one dimension is incomplete
3. Score decay is applied — the model reduces scores for inactive leads on a monthly schedule; no lead retains a high score indefinitely without recent engagement
4. Initial threshold is set, formally reviewed at 60 days, and adjusted based on sales feedback — the model is treated as a living calibration, not a fixed formula
5. BANT framework is applied as a secondary check on all leads crossing the threshold before they are handed to the sales team
6. The scoring model is documented in a shared spreadsheet or CRM field accessible to both marketing and sales — neither team operates from a version the other cannot see
7. Lead score distribution is reviewed monthly as a leading indicator of campaign quality — a shift in score distribution signals a change in lead quality before conversion data is available

---

References

Kahan, R. (2022) High-Velocity Digital Marketing: 7 Proven Strategies to Send Your Revenue Soaring Using Today's Best Digital Practices. Amplify Publishing.

Zahay, D. et al. (2024) Digital Marketing Management: A Handbook for the Current (or Future) CEO. 3rd edn. Business Expert Press.