self-learning

name	self-learning
description	Use when starting work on a new or unfamiliar project, when encountering unexpected patterns, when user corrects your assumptions, or when explicitly invoked via /learn - auto-discovers and remembers project context through structured codebase analysis

Overview

The self-learning skill automatically discovers, understands, and persists project context across sessions. It builds a mental model of the codebase, tech stack, conventions, and team preferences by scanning actual project artifacts. Without self-learning, every session starts from zero — with it, the agent accumulates institutional knowledge that improves accuracy and reduces errors over time.

Announce at start: "I'm using the self-learning skill to understand this project."

---

Phase 1: Trigger Identification

Determine which trigger activated this skill:

Trigger	Context	Action
New project	No memory files exist	Full discovery (Phases 2-5)
Unfamiliar area	Working in unknown part of codebase	Targeted discovery (Phase 2-3 for that area)
User correction	User says "that's wrong" or corrects an assumption	Correction protocol (Phase 6)
Explicit /learn	User invokes the command	Full discovery (Phases 2-5)
Session start	Memory files exist but may be stale	Load and validate memory (Phase 7)

STOP: Identify your trigger before proceeding. Different triggers require different phases.

---

Phase 2: Project Structure Scan

Use Explore agents to examine these files in order of priority:

File/Directory	What It Reveals	Priority
package.json / pyproject.toml / go.mod / Cargo.toml / composer.json	Tech stack, dependencies, scripts	Critical
README.md / CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md	Project purpose, conventions, rules	Critical
Directory structure (top 2 levels)	Architecture pattern (monorepo, MVC, hexagonal, etc.)	Critical
tsconfig.json / eslint.config.* / .prettierrc / phpstan.neon	Coding standards, strictness level	High
.gitignore	What is excluded, deployment hints	High
docker-compose.yml / Dockerfile	Infrastructure, services	Medium
.github/workflows/ / .gitlab-ci.yml	CI/CD setup, required checks	Medium
.env.example	Environment variables, external services	Medium
specs/ / docs/	Existing specifications and documentation	Medium

Action: For each file found, extract key facts. Do NOT read every file — scan strategically.

STOP: Complete the structure scan before analyzing code patterns.

---

Phase 3: Code Pattern Analysis

Examine 3-5 representative files to identify patterns:

Pattern Category	What to Look For	Example Indicators
Naming conventions	Variable/function/file naming	camelCase, snake_case, kebab-case, PascalCase
Import/export	Module organization	Barrel exports, relative vs absolute paths, path aliases
Error handling	How failures are managed	try/catch, Result types, error boundaries, custom exceptions
Testing patterns	Test framework and style	File naming (*.test.ts vs *.spec.ts), structure (describe/it vs test)
State management	How data flows	Redux, Zustand, Context, Vuex, Pinia, Livewire
API patterns	Communication style	REST, GraphQL, tRPC, RPC, WebSocket
Database access	Data layer approach	ORM (Prisma, Eloquent, TypeORM), raw SQL, query builder
Component patterns	UI structure	Atomic design, feature folders, co-located styles

Action: Open 3-5 files from different areas of the codebase. Record observed patterns with specific examples.

---

Phase 4: Git History Analysis

git log --oneline -20          # Recent commits — development velocity, commit style
git shortlog -sn -20           # Active contributors
git branch -a                  # Branching strategy
git log --diff-filter=A --name-only --pretty=format: -10 | head -30  # Recently added files

Extract: Development velocity, commit message conventions, branching strategy, active areas.

STOP: Complete all discovery phases before persisting to memory.

---

Phase 5: Persist to Memory

Update the following memory files (create if they do not exist, append if they do):

memory/project-context.md

# Project Context
<!-- Updated by self-learning skill -->
<!-- Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD -->

## Purpose
[What this project does, who it is for]

## Tech Stack
- Language: [e.g., TypeScript 5.x]
- Framework: [e.g., Next.js 15]
- Database: [e.g., PostgreSQL via Prisma]
- Testing: [e.g., Vitest + Playwright]
- CI/CD: [e.g., GitHub Actions]

## Architecture
[e.g., Monorepo with apps/ and packages/]
[Key directories and their purposes]

## Key Dependencies
[Critical libraries and their roles]

memory/learned-patterns.md

# Learned Patterns
<!-- Updated by self-learning skill -->
<!-- Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD -->

## Naming Conventions
[What was observed with specific examples]

## Code Organization
[Import patterns, file structure, module boundaries]

## Error Handling
[How errors are handled in this project with examples]

## Testing Approach
[Framework, patterns, naming, coverage expectations]

memory/user-preferences.md

# User Preferences
<!-- Updated by self-learning skill -->
<!-- Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD -->

## Communication Style
[Terse? Detailed? Prefers code over explanation?]

## Workflow Preferences
[PR workflow? Branch naming? Commit style?]

## Review Preferences
[What they focus on in reviews?]

memory/decisions-log.md

# Decisions Log
<!-- Updated by self-learning and brainstorming skills -->

## YYYY-MM-DD: [Decision Title]
**Decision:** [What was decided]
**Context:** [Why this came up]
**Rationale:** [Why this was chosen over alternatives]
**Alternatives considered:** [What else was considered]

---

Phase 6: Correction Protocol

When the user corrects an assumption:

1. Acknowledge the correction immediately — do not defend the wrong assumption
2. Identify which memory file should be updated
3. Update the memory file with the correction, including date and context
4. Apply the correction to current work immediately
5. Propagate — check if the correction invalidates other assumptions in memory

Correction Type	Memory File to Update	Example
Naming convention wrong	learned-patterns.md	"We use snake_case, not camelCase"
Tech stack wrong	project-context.md	"We use Vitest, not Jest"
Workflow preference	user-preferences.md	"Always create PRs, never push to main"
Architecture misunderstanding	project-context.md	"That is a microservice, not a monolith"
Decision context	decisions-log.md	"We chose X because of Y, not Z"

Do NOT skip the memory update. Corrections that are not persisted will be repeated.

---

Phase 7: Session Start — Memory Validation

When memory files already exist:

1. Load all memory files from memory/ directory
2. Check Last updated dates — flag anything older than 30 days
3. Spot-check 2-3 facts against current codebase (e.g., does package.json still list the same framework?)
4. If discrepancies found, run a targeted re-scan of the changed area
5. Update stale entries with current information

---

Decision Table: Discovery Depth

Situation	Discovery Depth	Time Budget
Brand new project, no memory files	Full (all phases)	3-5 minutes
New area of known project	Targeted (Phase 2-3 for that area only)	1-2 minutes
User correction	Correction protocol only (Phase 6)	30 seconds
Session start with existing memory	Validation only (Phase 7)	1 minute
Major refactor detected (many changed files)	Full re-scan	3-5 minutes

---

Anti-Patterns / Common Mistakes

What NOT to Do	Why It Fails	What to Do Instead
Read every file in the project	Wastes context window, slow	Scan strategically: config files first, then 3-5 representative code files
Assume conventions from one file	One file may be an outlier	Verify patterns across 2+ files before persisting
Overwrite memory files completely	Loses historical context and user corrections	Append or update specific sections, preserve history
Skip git history	Misses development velocity and team patterns	Always check recent commits and contributors
Persist guesses as facts	Poisons future sessions with wrong context	Only persist observations backed by evidence
Ignore user corrections	Repeats the same mistakes	Corrections override observations immediately
Deep-dive into implementation details	Loses the forest for the trees	Focus on patterns and conventions, not specific logic
Skip memory validation on session start	Uses stale context	Always spot-check memory against current codebase

---

Anti-Rationalization Guards

Thought	Reality
"I already know this framework"	You do not know THIS project's conventions. Scan.
"The memory files are recent enough"	Spot-check anyway. Code changes fast.
"This correction is minor"	Minor corrections prevent major errors. Persist it.
"I will remember this without writing it down"	You will not. Sessions are independent. Persist to memory.
"Scanning will take too long"	Not scanning leads to wrong assumptions that take longer to fix.

Do NOT skip memory persistence. If you discovered it, write it down.

---

Integration Points

Skill	Relationship
using-toolkit	Triggers self-learning at session start
brainstorming	Loads project context before idea generation
planning	Uses learned patterns to propose consistent approaches
code-review	Checks code against learned conventions
auto-improvement	Records discovery effectiveness metrics
resilient-execution	Failure patterns inform future approach selection

---

Concrete Examples

Discovery Command Sequence

# Step 1: Identify tech stack
cat package.json | head -50
# or
cat composer.json | head -50
# or
cat pyproject.toml

# Step 2: Check project structure
ls -la
ls -la src/ || ls -la app/ || ls -la lib/

# Step 3: Examine coding standards
cat tsconfig.json 2>/dev/null || cat phpstan.neon 2>/dev/null
cat .eslintrc* 2>/dev/null || cat .prettierrc* 2>/dev/null

# Step 4: Git activity
git log --oneline -20
git shortlog -sn -20

Memory Update After Correction

## 2026-03-15: Naming Convention Correction
**Previous assumption:** Project uses camelCase for database columns
**Correction:** Project uses snake_case for database columns (user corrected)
**Evidence:** Checked `migrations/` directory — all columns use snake_case
**Updated:** learned-patterns.md, Naming Conventions section

---

Key Principles

• Observe, do not assume — base learnings on evidence from the codebase
• Incremental updates — append to memory files, do not overwrite
• Verify before persisting — double-check observations with 2+ examples
• Respect corrections — user corrections override observations immediately
• Stay current — re-scan when significant changes occur

---

Skill Type

RIGID — Discovery phases must be followed in order. Memory persistence is mandatory. Corrections must be recorded immediately. Do not skip phases or rationalize away the need to scan.