memex-wrap

name	memex-wrap
description	Close out a finished memex milestone slice by writing the handoff trail: update `docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md` §1 current-state and §3 next-slice, tick the `docs/ROADMAP.md` scoreboard (milestone header ✅ + version, `- [x]` items), confirm any new observation is logged (deferring to memex-observe), and propose the git tag plus a `MN Slice X:` commit subject. Use after you finish a milestone slice in the memex repo and before you commit/tag it, when handing the next slice to a fresh session, or whenever CONTINUE_HERE and ROADMAP have drifted behind what actually shipped.
license	MIT
allowed-tools	Read Edit Bash
metadata	{"author":"Philipp Thoss","version":"1.0","domain":"memex","complexity":"intermediate","language":"multi","tags":"memex, handoff, milestone, continue-here, roadmap","locale":"ja","source_locale":"en","source_commit":"7d31fa1f","translator":"Claude + human review","translation_date":"2026-06-17"}

Wrap a Memex Milestone Slice

Close the loop on a finished slice. A slice ships code; the wrap ships the trail that lets the next session resume without re-deriving where things stand. Two docs carry that trail — docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md (where we are, what's next) and docs/ROADMAP.md (the milestone scoreboard) — and the wrap leaves both consistent with what actually landed. It does not log observations or run the verification gates itself; it confirms the first was done (deferring to memex-observe) and hands off to the second (memex-verify).

When to Use

• You just finished a milestone slice in the memex repo (a - [x]-sized unit of work) and are about to commit and tag it.
• You are handing the next slice to a fresh session and need CONTINUE_HERE.md to point at the right starting line.
• CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 or ROADMAP.md's scoreboard has drifted behind what actually shipped, and you want to reconcile them before moving on.

Inputs

• Required: The memex repo checked out, with cwd = repo root (a checkout of github.com/pjt222/memex). All paths below are repo-relative.
• Required: A finished slice — code committed or staged, slice known by its milestone + slice letter/number (e.g. "M5 Slice A").
• Required: docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md and docs/ROADMAP.md present and writable.
• Optional: $MEMEX_STORE_PATH / $MEMEX_PG_URL — only needed if Step 3 ends up logging a new observation, and even then the logging itself is delegated to memex-observe, which owns those prerequisites.

This skill edits docs and proposes git commands. It does not push, tag, or run the test gate — those belong to commit-changes and memex-verify.

Procedure

Step 1: Update docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 (current state) and §3 (next slice)

Read the file first; both sections are prose with a specific shape you must match, not free-form.

# Orient: the "Last updated" line, §1 Current state, §3 Next milestone
sed -n '1,40p' docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md
awk '/^## 1\./,/^## 2\./' docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md
awk '/^## 3\./,/^## 3a\./' docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md

Then edit (use the Edit tool — keep surrounding prose intact):

• Last updated: line near the top — set today's date and a one-line summary of the slice (mirror the existing format: date — what landed + the commit short-SHAs + branch + state).
• §1 Current state — move the finished slice from "in progress / next" into Shipped, following the existing M_ ... (shortsha, tag vX.Y.Z) cadence. If the slice opened new tech-debt or deferrals, note them where the section already tracks those.
• §3 Next milestone — if this slice completed a milestone, advance §3 to the next milestone (copy the goal / required-pieces / tasks-in-order / definition-of-done shape from ROADMAP.md). If the milestone has more slices left, narrow §3's "tasks in order" to the next slice so the fresh session starts on the right line.

Expected: §1 names the just-shipped slice under Shipped with its SHA(s) and (if a milestone closed) tag; §3 describes the next concrete slice. The Last updated: line reflects today.

On failure: If the section headers don't match (## 1. / ## 3.), the doc has been restructured — re-read it top-to-bottom and adapt to its current headings rather than forcing the old shape. Never fabricate a SHA; if the commit doesn't exist yet, write (<commit pending>) and fill it after Step 4.

Step 2: Tick the docs/ROADMAP.md scoreboard

The scoreboard encodes completion two ways: a milestone header gains a ✅ (vX.Y.Z) suffix when the milestone is done, and each finished line item flips - [ ] to - [x]. Read the relevant block first.

# Find the milestone block you're closing items in
awk '/^## M5/,/^## M6/' docs/ROADMAP.md

Then, with the Edit tool:

• Check the items you shipped: turn each finished - [ ] into - [x]. Leave genuinely-incomplete or deferred items as - [ ] (a deferred item often carries a — deferred to MX.Y note; preserve it).
• Mark the header only when the whole milestone is done — append ✅ (vX.Y.Z) to the ## MN — ... header, matching shipped milestones above it (e.g. ## M4 — MCP ✅ (v0.4.0)). A milestone with any unchecked, non-deferred item is not done — do not flag its header.

Expected: Every item the slice completed reads - [x]; the header shows ✅ (vX.Y.Z) if and only if all of its non-deferred items are checked. The new version matches the tag you propose in Step 4.

On failure: If you're unsure whether an item is truly done versus partially done, leave it - [ ] and note the partial state in CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 instead — an over-optimistic scoreboard is the exact drift this skill exists to prevent. Match the existing checkbox/version formatting; don't invent a new style.

Step 3: Confirm any new observation is logged (defer to memex-observe)

A slice that surfaced a bias, a near-miss, or a reusable lesson should have a matching observation in the bias-log. The wrap's job is to confirm that — not to author the entry or restate the logging CLI.

# Quick existence check: does the bias-log already hold this slice's lesson?
sed -n '1,40p' docs/OBSERVATIONS.md

Decide:

• Nothing worth logging? Note that explicitly in CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 ("no new observations this slice") so the next session knows it was considered, not skipped, and move on.
• A lesson is worth logging? Stop and run the memex-observe skill to add it. That skill owns the memex add --type observation ... command shape (body piped via stdin, --title required) and the prerequisites. Do not restate or inline that command here — invoke the skill.

The observation body shape lives in docs/OBSERVATIONS.md (the authoritative "Two paths to add an observation" block is lines 10–21). The current form (example, current as of v0.4.0; parsed by crates/memex-extract/src/meditate_vipassana.rs) is:

N. **Title.** Body sentence(s). Mitigation: <what to do next time>. Origin: <date> + <context>.

Treat docs/OBSERVATIONS.md lines 10–21 as the source of truth for this shape — if it has moved on from the v0.4.0 form, follow the file, not this example.

Expected: Either a recorded decision that there's nothing to log (noted in §1), or a new observation added via memex-observe with the next entry number.

On failure: If you can't tell whether a lesson is observation-worthy, err toward logging it — a redundant observation costs little; a lost one costs a re-derivation next session.

Step 4: Propose the git tag and the commit subject

Don't commit or tag here — propose both so the operator (or the commit-changes skill) can execute them. Use the memex commit convention: subject = MN Slice X: <summary>.

# Surface what's staged/unstaged so the proposed subject matches reality
git -C . status --short
git -C . diff --stat

Propose:

• Commit subject — MN Slice X: <imperative summary> (e.g. M5 Slice A: per-file project helper + watcher skeleton). Keep the subject tight; put the why and the doc-trail updates in the body.
• Tag — only when this slice closes a milestone. Propose the next semver tag matching the ✅ (vX.Y.Z) you set in Step 2 (e.g. v0.5.0 for M5). A mid-milestone slice gets a commit but no tag — say so explicitly rather than proposing a tag.

Present both as a ready-to-run block for the operator to confirm:

Proposed commit subject: M5 Slice A: per-file project helper + watcher skeleton
Proposed tag:           (none — mid-milestone slice; tag at M5 close as v0.5.0)

Expected: A clearly-labeled proposal: one commit subject in MN Slice X: form, and either a concrete vX.Y.Z tag (milestone close) or an explicit "no tag this slice" note. Nothing is committed or tagged by this skill.

On failure: If the milestone number / slice letter is ambiguous, read ROADMAP.md and CONTINUE_HERE.md §3 to fix the MN and X; never guess a version — derive it from the scoreboard you just ticked in Step 2.

Validation

• CONTINUE_HERE.md §1 lists the just-shipped slice under Shipped with its commit SHA(s), and Last updated: reflects today
• CONTINUE_HERE.md §3 points at the next concrete slice (advanced to the next milestone if this slice closed one)
• Every ROADMAP.md item the slice completed is now - [x]; deferred items remain - [ ] with their deferral notes intact
• The ROADMAP.md milestone header carries ✅ (vX.Y.Z) iff all its non-deferred items are checked
• A new observation was added via memex-observe, or §1 explicitly records that none was needed
• A commit subject in MN Slice X: form is proposed, plus a concrete tag (milestone close) or an explicit "no tag" note — nothing committed or tagged by this skill

Common Pitfalls

• Flagging a milestone header done while an item is still open. The ✅ on the header is an all-items claim. Tick items in Step 2 first, then check the header only if nothing non-deferred remains.
• Restating the observation CLI here. Step 3 confirms logging happened; it delegates the actual memex add to memex-observe. Inlining the command duplicates a surface that drifts — reference the skill instead.
• Running memex init. That is the CLI store/db setup command, not part of any wrap or session ritual. Wrapping a slice never calls memex init.
• Inventing a SHA or version. Derive the tag from the scoreboard you just ticked; derive the SHA from git log after the commit exists. Use a (pending) placeholder rather than a fabricated value.
• Committing or tagging from this skill. The wrap proposes; execution is commit-changes' job, and the test/format gate is memex-verify's. Keep the boundary — don't let the heaviest skill absorb its neighbors.
• Hard-asserting a test count as a pass gate. That belongs to memex-verify, and even there the gate is exit 0 / "test result: ok" — counts (e.g. "~60 at v0.4.0") are informational and grow per milestone.
• Forcing the old doc shape after a restructure. If ## 1. / ## 3. or the scoreboard headings have changed, adapt to the file as it is now; the doc-reading order itself is owned by adapters/session-init.txt.

Related Skills

• memex-init — the session-start counterpart: loads the trail this skill writes. Wrap closes the loop that init opens.
• memex-observe — owns logging a bias-log observation; Step 3 defers to it rather than restating its CLI.
• memex-verify — runs the test/format/build gate; the wrap proposes the commit, verify confirms the slice is green before it lands.
• write-continue-here — the general-purpose continuation-file skill; this skill is its memex-specific specialization for §1/§3 and the scoreboard.
• commit-changes — executes the commit subject and tag that Step 4 proposes.