Skip to main content

posthog-support-tickets-churn

Test whether support tickets predict churn with a three-way join of PostHog engagement, Zendesk/Intercom tickets and topics, and Stripe churn, ranking the support issues that precede the most lost revenue, saved as a reusable PostHog insight. Use this whenever someone asks whether support contact or tickets predict churn, which ticket topics lead to cancellations, which support issues cost the most revenue, or how tickets correlate with retention. Triggers on phrasings like 'do tickets predict churn', 'which support issues cause churn', 'tickets vs retention', 'support topics that lose revenue', or 'does contacting support mean they will leave'. Boundary: this requires support-tool data (Zendesk/Intercom). For churn warning signs from PRODUCT USAGE alone with no tickets, use posthog-pre-cancellation-behavior. It sets up the Zendesk/Intercom and Stripe sources if needed and builds the insight end-to-end.

来源信息

仓库
PostHog/posthog.com
最近来源活动
2026年10月22日 11:06
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
1,155
Forks
936

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

文件资源管理器
2 个文件

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
posthog-support-tickets-churn
description
Test whether support tickets predict churn with a three-way join of PostHog engagement, Zendesk/Intercom tickets and topics, and Stripe churn, ranking the support issues that precede the most lost revenue, saved as a reusable PostHog insight. Use this whenever someone asks whether support contact or tickets predict churn, which ticket topics lead to cancellations, which support issues cost the most revenue, or how tickets correlate with retention. Triggers on phrasings like 'do tickets predict churn', 'which support issues cause churn', 'tickets vs retention', 'support topics that lose revenue', or 'does contacting support mean they will leave'. Boundary: this requires support-tool data (Zendesk/Intercom). For churn warning signs from PRODUCT USAGE alone with no tickets, use posthog-pre-cancellation-behavior. It sets up the Zendesk/Intercom and Stripe sources if needed and builds the insight end-to-end.
# Do support tickets predict churn? **Question:** Which support ticket volumes/topics precede the most churned revenue? **For:** Support & CS · **Difficulty:** Intermediate · **Shape:** a three-way join **Data sources:** PostHog events (engagement) + Zendesk/Intercom (tickets & topics) + Stripe (churn) ## What this produces A saved PostHog insight ranking support issues by the revenue that churns after them, and showing how ticket volume relates to engagement and cancellation — so the user knows which support problems actually cost money. ## Workflow First read `references/posthog-workflow.md` for the shared setup: confirm the PostHog MCP is connected, ensure the Zendesk (or Intercom) and Stripe sources exist (secure connect-link flow for each if not), and learn the real schema. This question needs two external sources plus PostHog, so verify all three are present before querying. Then: ### 1. Identify the pieces in this project - **Tickets & topics.** From Zendesk/Intercom: ticket rows with a customer identifier, created date, and a topic/tag/category field. Confirm which field carries the "topic". - **Churn.** From Stripe: canceled subscriptions and the revenue lost (approximate from the last active `stripe_invoice`/subscription value — see the money gotchas in the shared reference). - **Engagement.** A per-account PostHog engagement measure (event count or active days). - **Join key.** Tickets → accounts by email or domain; accounts → Stripe by email/customer id. Domain joins (`splitByChar('@', email)[2]`) are common when tickets are logged per-company. ### 2. Build and validate the query Adapt names/fields and validate with `query-run`. Core idea: per topic, sum the churned revenue of accounts that filed that topic. ```sql -- Support topics ranked by the churned revenue of accounts that filed them. -- Adapt: ticket table/fields, the topic field, the churn/revenue logic, and join keys. WITH churned AS ( SELECT lower(email) AS email, sum(amount) / 100.0 AS lost_revenue FROM stripe_invoice WHERE status = 'paid' AND lower(email) IN ( SELECT lower(email) FROM stripe_subscription WHERE status = 'canceled' ) GROUP BY lower(email) ), tickets AS ( SELECT lower(requester_email) AS email, subject_topic AS topic FROM zendesk_tickets WHERE created_at >= now() - INTERVAL 180 DAY ) SELECT t.topic, count(DISTINCT t.email) AS accounts_with_topic, count() AS ticket_count, round(sum(c.lost_revenue), 2) AS churned_revenue_after_topic FROM tickets AS t INNER JOIN churned AS c ON t.email = c.email GROUP BY t.topic ORDER BY churned_revenue_after_topic DESC ``` Be honest in the writeup: this shows correlation between topics and churned revenue, not proof the tickets caused churn. A high-volume topic among healthy accounts can still be fine. ### 3. Save the insight Save as a SQL/HogQL table insight named "Support topics ranked by churned revenue", with a note on the churn/revenue method. Return the URL and call out the top revenue-costing issues. ## Self-driving development (offer this) With issues ranked by the revenue they cost, the user can spot accounts hit by the worst ones. Offer to help build a cohort of accounts with those tickets and trigger proactive CS outreach or a fix experiment — protecting revenue automatically.
在 GitHub 查看