菜单
James Bach's HTSM Product Factors (SFDIPOT) analysis for comprehensive test strategy generation. Use when analyzing requirements, epics, or user stories to generate prioritized test ideas across Structure, Function, Data, Interfaces, Platform, Operations, and Time dimensions.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill sfdipot-product-factors命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
Ruflo is a multi-agent orchestration platform for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Copilot, Gemini, Amp, +12 more). Use this skill when the user wants to (1) install/init ruflo in a project, (2) run multi-agent swarms with hierarchical coordination, (3) use ruflo's 314+ MCP tools for memory, routing, hooks, sub-agents, or workflows, (4) check ruflo status/version/doctor health, or (5) discover which of ruflo's 30+ plugins fits their task.
Build dependency-aware execution plans for complex Agentic QE, Ruflo, integration, migration, or multi-stream engineering programs. Use when Codex must turn research or requirements into phased work, select a small AQE fleet, map critical paths and parallel streams, define acceptance gates, or sequence risky changes. Use aqe-plan-quality instead when the primary output is only a test or quality plan.
Conduct evidence-first technical research for Agentic QE, Ruflo, related ruvnet projects, or external tools. Use when Codex must investigate a repository, compare current upstream changes, trace dependencies and history, distinguish verified facts from inference, or synthesize findings into actionable engineering recommendations. Do not use for a simple known-answer lookup or an implementation-only task.
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | sfdipot-product-factors |
| description | James Bach's HTSM Product Factors (SFDIPOT) analysis for comprehensive test strategy generation. Use when analyzing requirements, epics, or user stories to generate prioritized test ideas across Structure, Function, Data, Interfaces, Platform, Operations, and Time dimensions. |
| category | requirements-analysis |
| priority | high |
| tokenEstimate | 1500 |
| agents | ["qe-product-factors-assessor","qe-test-idea-rewriter"] |
| implementation_status | optimized |
| optimization_version | 1 |
| last_optimized | "2026-01-17T00:00:00.000Z" |
| dependencies | ["brutal-honesty-review"] |
| quick_reference_card | true |
| tags | ["sfdipot","htsm","product-factors","test-strategy","requirements","james-bach"] |
<default_to_action> When analyzing requirements:
Quality Gates:
| Factor | Question | Example Focus Areas |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | What IS it? | Components, code, dependencies |
| Function | What does it DO? | Features, calculations, errors |
| Data | What does it PROCESS? | Input, output, persistence |
| Interfaces | How does it CONNECT? | UI, API, integrations |
| Platform | What does it DEPEND ON? | OS, browser, hardware |
| Operations | How is it USED? | Workflows, admin, recovery |
| Time | WHEN do things happen? | Concurrency, scheduling |
| Scenario | Priority | Output |
|---|---|---|
| New epic planning | High | Full SFDIPOT assessment + test ideas |
| Sprint requirement review | Medium | Targeted analysis + clarifying questions |
| Test strategy definition | High | Comprehensive test coverage plan |
| Risk assessment | High | Domain-weighted priority assignment |
| Coverage gap analysis |
| Medium |
| Penetrating questions + recommendations |
Subcategories:
Sample Test Ideas:
Subcategories:
Sample Test Ideas:
Subcategories:
Sample Test Ideas:
Subcategories:
Sample Test Ideas:
Subcategories:
Sample Test Ideas:
Subcategories:
Sample Test Ideas:
Subcategories:
Sample Test Ideas:
NEVER use "Verify X" patterns. Always use action verbs.
| Bad Pattern | Good Pattern |
|---|---|
| Verify login works | Submit credentials; confirm session created |
| Verify API returns 200 | Send request; assert 200 response |
| Verify error displays | Trigger error; observe message |
| Priority | Percentage | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| P0 (Critical) | 8-12% | Security, data loss, regulatory |
| P1 (High) | 20-30% | Core functionality, user impact |
| P2 (Medium) | 35-45% | Standard features, edge cases |
| P3 (Low) | 20-30% | Polish, minor improvements |
| Type | Percentage | Use For |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | 30-40% | Isolated logic, calculations |
| Integration | 15-25% | API contracts, data flow |
| E2E | <=50% | User journeys, workflows |
| Human Exploration | >=10% | Usability, edge cases |
// Full SFDIPOT assessment
await Task("SFDIPOT Assessment", {
input: epicDocument,
outputFormat: "html",
domains: ["ecommerce"],
brutalHonesty: true
}, "qe-product-factors-assessor");
// Transform verify patterns
await Task("Rewrite Test Ideas", {
inputFile: assessmentHtml,
preserveMetadata: true
}, "qe-test-idea-rewriter");
aqe/sfdipot/
├── assessments/* - Assessment results
├── patterns/* - Learned domain patterns
├── test-ideas/* - Generated test ideas
└── questions/* - Clarifying questions
SFDIPOT ensures comprehensive test coverage by examining products from 7 distinct perspectives. Each category reveals risks that other perspectives might miss. Use domain detection to weight priorities appropriately.