Skip to main content

brand-kit

Put the person's colors, fonts, and usage rules on one page. Then prove the kit works by restyling one real artifact. Use when they say "make my stuff look consistent", "brand guidelines", or their site, slides, and posts all look unrelated.

来源信息

仓库
protosphinx/sphinxstack
最近来源活动
2026年7月29日 13:55
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
3
Forks
0

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

文件资源管理器
2 个文件

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
brand-kit
category
design
description
Put the person's colors, fonts, and usage rules on one page. Then prove the kit works by restyling one real artifact. Use when they say "make my stuff look consistent", "brand guidelines", or their site, slides, and posts all look unrelated.
# brand-kit Write down the visual decisions for someone's real project so they stop re-deciding them. The output is one page — a brand kit — plus one existing artifact restyled to match it, which is the proof the kit works. This assumes some decisions already exist or get made now; if they have nothing at all, run pick-fonts-and-colors first and come back. ## Collect what exists Look at everything they currently have: site, resume, slides, avatars, posts. List every font and color actually in use (pull hex values from the real files, do not guess). Show them the list — seeing eleven grays and five fonts is usually the moment they understand why a kit exists. ## Decide and cut Work down to a small fixed set, their pick at each step with your one-line trade-off on the options: - Two fonts: one for headings, one for body. Free sources only (Google Fonts). Name the exact weights allowed — usually two per font. - Colors: one background, one text color, one accent. Optionally one neutral gray for secondary text. Exact hex values. Check the text/background pair for contrast (aim for WCAG AA) and say so in the kit. - Logo usage if a logo exists: minimum size, clear space, the black and white variants, and the one background it never goes on. - Voice line: one sentence on how written things sound, in their words. Everything not on the list is banned by default. That is the point of the kit — the next decision is already made. ## Write the page One file, `brand.md` (or `brand.html` if they want it visual), in the project repo. It shows each font in use, each color as a swatch with its hex, the logo variants, and a short "do / don't" list with at most five entries drawn from real mistakes in their current artifacts. Keep it under a page. A kit nobody rereads in thirty seconds is a kit nobody uses. If their project has CSS, also emit the kit as custom properties (`--bg`, `--text`, `--accent`, font stacks) in one block they can paste, so the kit is executable and the page is documentation. ## Prove it Pick the artifact of theirs that currently strays furthest from the kit and restyle it together, using only what the kit allows. Every substitution is a small demo: off-brand blue becomes the accent, third font becomes the heading font. Ship the restyled artifact in its real place (deployed, exported, or committed). ## Done - The kit page exists in the repo and records fonts, colors, logo rules, and voice - One real artifact matches the kit and passes the stated contrast check - The person can answer a common design question from the kit without reopening a color or font picker
在 GitHub 查看