Skip to main content

build-a-course-reading-list

Build a course reading list with purposeful sequencing, source diversity, accessibility, workload control, rights, and alternatives. Use when readings must support stated learning outcomes.

来源信息

仓库
protosphinx/sphinxstack
最近来源活动
2026年7月29日 13:55
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
2
分支
0

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

文件资源管理器
2 个文件

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
build-a-course-reading-list
category
school
description
Build a course reading list with purposeful sequencing, source diversity, accessibility, workload control, rights, and alternatives. Use when readings must support stated learning outcomes.
# build-a-course-reading-list Every reading earns its place in the learning sequence. ## When to use - Use for courses, workshops, programs, or guided independent study. - Do not require inaccessible, unlawfully shared, or needlessly expensive material. ## Preconditions - Define learners, outcomes, course length, contact hours, budget, language, accessibility, and institutional rules. ## Procedure 1. Map each outcome to the concepts, evidence, practice, and perspectives learners need. 2. Search authoritative, foundational, contemporary, critical, and applied sources. 3. Verify authorship, edition, status, rights, access, format, and accessibility. 4. Evaluate whose knowledge, geography, methods, languages, and lived experience are represented or missing. 5. Estimate weekly reading time and mark required, excerpted, optional, and reference items. 6. Sequence readings by prerequisite and pair disagreements deliberately. 7. Add a teaching purpose, prompt, and accessible alternative for each required item. 8. Ask a learner or librarian to test access and workload. ## Failure plan - If a required source is inaccessible, secure a lawful accessible copy or replace it. - If workload exceeds capacity, cut or excerpt rather than hiding optionality. ## Worked example An eight-week policy course pairs foundational theory with empirical critiques, caps weekly reading time, and provides accessible alternatives for one unavailable archive item. ## Done - A reading-list document records outcomes, sequence, source purpose, workload, access, rights, representation, and alternatives - Link, edition, accessibility, cost, workload, diversity, and learner-test checks verify usability
在 GitHub 查看