用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/ranbot-ai/awesome-skills --skill conductor-new-track命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Generate project-specific AGENTS.md and companion rules by analyzing a codebase. Supports full, minimal, update, and dry-run modes with package-manager detection, monorepos, backups, managed blocks, c
Run protected AAS maintainer sweeps, PR merge batches, canonical sync, Core preview checks, and scripted releases. Use for repository maintenance, main alignment, CLI/MCP/Workbench changes, or release
Provision backend infra through Cohesivity (cohesivity.ai): Postgres, hosting, auth, storage, and AI model APIs over one HTTP API. Use when a .cohesivity file exists or a project needs a backend.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | conductor-new-track |
| description | Create a new track with specification and phased implementation plan |
| category | Document Processing |
| source | antigravity |
| tags | ["markdown","api","ai","workflow","document"] |
| url | https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills/tree/main/skills/conductor-new-track |
Create a new track (feature, bug fix, chore, or refactor) with a detailed specification and phased implementation plan.
resources/implementation-playbook.md.Verify Conductor is initialized:
conductor/product.md existsconductor/tech-stack.md existsconductor/workflow.md exists/conductor:setup firstLoad context files:
conductor/product.md for product contextconductor/tech-stack.md for technical contextconductor/workflow.md for TDD/commit preferencesDetermine track type based on description or ask user:
What type of track is this?
1. Feature - New functionality
2. Bug - Fix for existing issue
3. Chore - Maintenance, dependencies, config
4. Refactor - Code improvement without behavior change
CRITICAL RULES:
Q1: Feature Summary
Describe the feature in 1-2 sentences.
[If argument provided, confirm: "You want to: {argument}. Is this correct?"]
Q2: User Story
Who benefits and how?
Format: As a [user type], I want to [action] so that [benefit].
Q3: Acceptance Criteria
What must be true for this feature to be complete?
List 3-5 acceptance criteria (one per line):
Q4: Dependencies
Does this depend on any existing code, APIs, or other tracks?
1. No dependencies
2. Depends on existing code (specify)
3. Depends on incomplete track (specify)
Q5: Scope Boundaries
What is explicitly OUT of scope for this track?
(Helps prevent scope creep)
Q6: Technical Considerations (optional)
Any specific technical approach or constraints?
(Press enter to skip)
Q1: Bug Summary
What is broken?
[If argument provided, confirm]
Q2: Steps to Reproduce
How can this bug be reproduced?
List steps:
Q3: Expected vs Actual Behavior
What should happen vs what actually happens?
Q4: Affected Areas
What parts of the system are affected?
Q5: Root Cause Hypothesis (optional)
Any hypothesis about the cause?
(Press enter to skip)
Q1: Task Summary
What needs to be done?
[If argument provided, confirm]
Q2: Motivation
Why is this work needed?
Q3: Success Criteria
How will we know this is complete?
Q4: Risk Assessment
What could go wrong? Any risky changes?
Generate track ID in format: {shortname}_{YYYYMMDD}
user-auth_20250115, nav-bug_20250115Validate uniqueness:
conductor/tracks.md for existing IDsuser-auth_20250115_2Create conductor/tracks/{trackId}/spec.md:
# Specification: {Track Title}
**Track ID:** {trackId}
**Type:** {Feature|Bug|Chore|Refactor}
**Created:** {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Status:** Draft
## Summary
{1-2 sentence summary}
## Context
{Product context from product.md relevant to this track}
## User Story (for features)
As a {user}, I want to {action} so that {benefit}.
## Problem Description (for bugs)
{Bug description, steps to reproduce}
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] {Criterion 1}
- [ ] {Criterion 2}
- [ ] {Criterion 3}
## Dependencies
{List dependencies or "None"}
## Out of Scope
{Explicit exclusions}
## Technical Notes
{Technical considerations or "None specified"}
---
_Generated by Conductor. Review and edit as needed._
Display the generated spec and ask:
Here is the specification I've generated:
{spec content}
Is this specification correct?
1. Yes, proceed to plan generation
2. No, let me edit (opens for inline edits)
3. Start over with different inputs
After spec approval, generate conductor/tracks/{trackId}/plan.md:
# Implementation Plan: {Track Title}
**Track ID:** {trackId}
**Spec:** spec.md
**Created:** {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Status:** [ ] Not Started
## Overview
{Brief summary of implementation approach}
## Phase 1: {Phase Name}
{Phase description}
### Tasks
- [ ] Ta