Skip to main content

ripwire-find-bug

You have a SYMPTOM — crash, exception, wrong output, failing test, error string — and don't know which code is responsible. Ranks candidates; a stack trace or sanitizer output maps onto frames innermost-first; 'it worked yesterday' / 'my last edit broke it' → --situ. One clear hit plus one focused read is enough.

跳到安装

来源信息

仓库
redhat-et/ripwire
最近来源活动
2026年9月14日 02:06
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
2,234
分支
141

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
ripwire-find-bug
description
You have a SYMPTOM — crash, exception, wrong output, failing test, error string — and don't know which code is responsible. Ranks candidates; a stack trace or sanitizer output maps onto frames innermost-first; 'it worked yesterday' / 'my last edit broke it' → --situ. One clear hit plus one focused read is enough.
allowed-tools
Bash, Read
# Find the bug with ripwire > Nearest neighbours: > • You already know the symbol and just want to understand it → **ripwire-navigate**. > • You want the blast radius / tests for a *change* (not to find a bug) → **ripwire-change-check**. > • Repo-wide quality once-over, no specific symptom → **ripwire-fresh-eyes**. > • "Why don't I see feature X?" and nothing looks broken — the code may be built but compiled/flagged OFF, > not buggy: `ripwire <dir> --flags[=SUBSTR] --legend=compact` (`--flip=NAME` for the blast radius of turning one ON) — > lives in **ripwire-fresh-eyes**, worth a look before you go hunting for a bug that isn't one. `<dir>` = repo root. Calls are warm after the first parse — chain freely. **Pick the branch that matches what you already know**; each converges on the same evidence trail (relevance × maintenance pain × blast radius), so you can escalate between them. **Evidence-sufficiency stop:** escalate only while the responsible code is still ambiguous. If `--for` ranks one file/symbol clearly and a focused source read explains the symptom with a minimal fix, stop retrieval and implement/validate it. Do not automatically add `--hotspots`, `--impact`, another skill, or a whole-file read after the defect is already proven; those answer different questions and can cost more than the original localization. Resume the ladder only when the source contradicts the candidate, several candidates remain plausible, or the change's blast radius is itself part of the task. ## Branch A — "I have a symptom, no idea where it lives" 1. **Symptom search** — `ripwire <dir> --for="<symptom in plain words>"` `<sigs>` ranked by relevance — signatures + doc-comments closest to the symptom. The `in=` reuse count and `cx=` complexity are inline; **prefer high-`cx`, high-`in` matches** — complex, widely-called code fails in more ways. If the bundle says `weak="1"`, reformulate — split camelCase terms, add synonyms from the domain, or quote an exact path/symbol from the issue — before trusting the ranking below it. 2. **If several candidates remain, maintenance hotspots** — `ripwire <dir> --hotspots --legend=compact` `<hotspots>` ranked by `score = churn × ccx`; `top=` names the worst function per file. Bugs cluster in high-score files — **cross with step 1: a symbol in both lists is your prime suspect.** 3. **If the symptom is broad, blast radius of each remaining candidate** — `ripwire <dir> --impact=SYM --legend=compact` for the top 2–3 from step 1. `<impact of="SYM" defs="D" reaches="N">` lists everything that reaches SYM. A large `reaches` count is consistent with a symptom that appears in many places — that's the root, not a downstream effect. 4. **Read narrowly** — start with the top symbol/body or the smallest source range that can confirm or reject it. Use the hotspot intersection only when step 1 did not already isolate a defensible candidate. ## Branch B — "I suspect a subsystem — narrow it" 1. **Symptom-to-code** — `ripwire <dir> --for="<symptom>"` → note the `p=` (file paths) of the top 5. Which directories recur? That's your first narrowing. 2. **Hotspots in those directories** — `ripwire <dir> --hotspots --legend=compact` → files that are relevant to the symptom AND high churn+complexity are the most likely bug homes. 3. **Find the exact emit site** — `ripwire <dir> --grep="ERROR_STRING" --legend=compact` (literal + enclosing symbol) or `--regex="pattern"`. Add `--grep-context=N` (or `--grep-before=N`/`--grep-after=N`) for ripgrep-style lines of source around each hit — often enough to confirm the bug without a follow-up `--expand`. The enclosing symbol (`in=`) is ground truth — now `--callers=SYM` to trace up one level to the true root. ## Branch C — "I changed X and now something's broken" (regression) 1. **Situational awareness on the change** — `ripwire <dir> --situ=fileA.cpp,fileB.h` (or bare `--situ` to read from `git diff`). Emits, in one pass: - **blast radius** — everything that transitively reaches the changed symbols - **tests to run now** (`--affected` under the hood) - **co-change partners NOT in your diff** — files that historically move together (hidden coupling). This is the Shotgun Surgery check: did the change land everywhere it usually has to? 2. **Who calls the broken symbol** — `ripwire <dir> --callers=SYM --legend=compact` → each recorded caller (a floor — counts_floor=) is a candidate for an unexpected side-effect. 3. **Co-change history** — `ripwire <dir> --cochange=fileA.cpp --legend=compact` → partners ranked by `deg` (fraction of commits). A `surprising="1"` partner has no `#include` link — pure behavioural coupling, the non-obvious suspect. 4. **Read** the functions that appear in BOTH the blast radius and the co-change list first. ## Branch D — "I have a stack trace / sanitizer report / compiler error" You have the failing artifact's TEXT (a Python traceback, an ASan/UBSan report, a node/js stack, a clang/gcc diagnostic) — don't hand-translate its frames into queries one by one. Pipe it straight in: 1. **Map the trace onto symbols** — `ripwire <dir> --from-trace=FILE --legend=compact` (or `--from-trace=-` to read the trace from stdin, e.g. `pytest ... 2>&1 | ripwire <dir> --from-trace=- --legend=compact`). Table-driven frame extraction (python / asan / node / compiler / generic), ranked **innermost-first** over the frames that resolve to your indexed code. Out-of-corpus frames (stdlib, vendored deps) are listed and counted, never ranked. 2. **Read rank 1 first** — the `innermost="1"` suspect is the crash/throw site; its FULL body is emitted inline, the other suspects as signatures. `skipped=` tells you how many frames fell outside every root. 3. **Compose the budget** — `--from-trace=FILE --token-budget=N` fits the bundle to N tokens for a tight context window. Unparseable input refuses loudly (never a misleading empty map). 4. **Or skip the run-read-paste loop entirely** — `ripwire <dir> --run-trace="make -j" --legend=compact` RUNS the build/test command itself (`sh -c`, your user, your environment — the make trust model, no sandbox) and, on a non-zero exit, serves the SAME from-trace bundle for the captured output plus a token-frugal `<lines view="relevant">` cut of the error/frame-shaped output lines. Exit 0 gets a minimal success record and no bundle — nothing failed, nothing to map. The command's own exit code is always disclosed (`<run exit=>`), and `--run-timeout=SECONDS` caps a hanging command (default 600 s, reported `timed_out="1"` honestly, never as an empty success). ## Output Report the branch you took, then: ranked candidate symbol(s) with `name`, `file:line`, and why (from `--for`); their hotspot score if present; their blast-radius count (`--impact reaches=`); the error site's enclosing symbol if `--grep` found it; and any `surprising="1"` co-change partner (branch C). Recommend the top 1–2 to inspect first, with the evidence trail. **Honesty:** the call graph gives *structure*; `--slice=SYM:VAR` (add `--slice-flow=back|fwd|both` for the transitive reaching-definition walk) gives *intra-procedural, name-based* data flow — reach for it on a wrong-value symptom instead of re-reading the whole function by eye. Its own legend discloses the limits that matter here, so trust that over this line: statement/line-granular, flow-sensitive reaching definitions inside one function for C-family/Python and source-ordered for JS/Go/Java/Rust (the root's `reach=` says which; each use row's `rd=` lists its reaching def lines), no alias analysis, block scopes separated (a shadowed name's rows carry `b=`, the declaration each binds to; `pp="1"` marks a build-dependent `#ifdef` row), and it stops at the function boundary (chain `--callers`/`--impact` for the inter-procedural half). For use-after-move / taint / null / type bugs that cross that boundary you still need the compiler — use these results to focus *where* to look, not as proof. A high-`amb` symbol can be a dispatch hub, not the bug. **Found it?** Pin the gotcha with `ripwire <dir> --note-add="SYM_or_path: what actually went wrong"` — the next agent (or you, next session) gets it automatically the next time `--for`/`--expand` surfaces that symbol.
在 GitHub 查看