| name | interview-me |
| description | Interactive interview to formalize a research idea into a structured specification with hypotheses and empirical strategy |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
| argument-hint | [brief topic or 'start fresh'] |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Write"] |
Research Interview
Conduct a structured interview to help formalize a research idea into a concrete specification.
Input: $ARGUMENTS -- a brief topic description or "start fresh" for an open-ended exploration.
How This Works
This is a conversational skill. Ask questions directly in your text responses, one or two at a time. Wait for the user to respond before continuing.
Interview Structure
Phase 1: The Big Picture (1-2 questions)
- "What phenomenon or puzzle are you trying to understand?"
- "Why does this matter? Who should care about the answer?"
Phase 2: Theoretical Motivation (1-2 questions)
- "What's your intuition for why X happens / what drives Y?"
- "What would standard theory predict?"
Phase 3: Data and Setting (1-2 questions)
- "What data do you have access to?"
- "Is there a specific context or institutional setting?"
Phase 4: Identification (1-2 questions)
- "Is there a natural experiment or source of variation you can exploit?"
- "What's the biggest threat to a causal interpretation?"
Phase 5: Expected Results (1-2 questions)
- "What would you expect to find?"
- "What would the results imply for policy or theory?"
Phase 6: Contribution (1 question)
- "How does this differ from what's already been done?"
After the Interview
Produce a Research Specification Document and save to quality_reports/research_spec_[sanitized_topic].md.
Interview Style
- Be curious, not prescriptive.
- Probe weak spots gently.
- Build on answers.
- Know when to stop.