analyzer

# Content Analyzer Skill > Any content → structured analysis report with actionable insights ## Trigger When user sends content (URL, text, or transcript) with analysis intent: - `/analyze [URL]` - "Analyze this article" - "What are the key takeaways?" - Auto-triggered after video/podcast transcription (from video skill) ## Pipeline ### Step 1: Get Content Choose tool based on input type: | Input | Tool | |-------|------| | Tweet URL | `fetch_tweet` or Jina Reader | | Web URL | `WebFetch` or Jina Reader | | Local file | Read file directly | | Transcript from video skill | Use directly | ### Step 2: Multi-Dimensional Analysis Scan content across these dimensions. Only output dimensions with actual content — skip empty ones. ```markdown ## 📖 Summary [1-3 sentence core thesis] **Source**: [author/publisher] · [date] **Type**: [tweet/article/video/podcast/report] --- ## 💡 Key Insights ### 🎯 Core Arguments - **Thesis**: [Main argument or finding] - **Evidence**: [Supporting data or reasoning] - **Strength**: [How convincing? What's missing?] ### 🤖 Tools & Methods - **What**: [Tools, frameworks, or techniques mentioned] - **How**: [How they're used or applied] - **Relevance**: [Could you use this?] ### ⚙️ Workflow Ideas - **Optimization**: [Process improvements mentioned] - **Automation**: [What could be automated] - **Integration**: [How to fit into existing workflow] ### 📊 Data & Numbers - **Key metrics**: [Important numbers mentioned] - **Trends**: [Patterns in the data] - **Gaps**: [What data is missing] ### ⚠️ Risks & Warnings - **Pitfalls**: [Explicitly mentioned risks] - **Blind spots**: [What the author might be missing] - **Counter-arguments**: [Alternative perspectives] ### 🔗 Resources - **Tools/APIs**: [Mentioned tools or data sources] - **People**: [Worth following or referencing] - **Further reading**: [Related content] ### 🧠 Mental Model Shifts - **Before**: [Common assumption] - **After**: [New understanding from this content] - **Impact**: [How this changes decisions] --- ## ✅ Action Items ### Quick Wins (< 30 min) - [ ] [Action 1] — Impact: ★★★★ | Effort: Easy - [ ] [Action 2] — Impact: ★★★ | Effort: Easy ### Deeper Work (1-3 hours) - [ ] [Action 3] — Impact: ★★★ | Effort: Medium - [ ] [Action 4] — Impact: ★★ | Effort: Medium ### Exploration (needs validation) - [ ] [Action 5] — Impact: ★★★ | Effort: Hard | Nature: Exploratory ``` ### Step 3: Personalized Relevance (Customizable) Map insights to YOUR context. Edit the dimensions below to match your own projects, interests, and systems. ```markdown ## 🔄 How This Applies to Me ### My Projects - **[Project A]**: [How this insight connects] - **[Project B]**: [What I could apply] ### My Knowledge Base - **Update**: [Which notes/docs to update] - **New entry**: [What to add to my knowledge system] ### My Decision Log - **Changed my mind about**: [what and why] - **Confirmed my belief that**: [what] ``` > **Customization**: Edit the dimensions in Step 2 and Step 3 to match your own > domain. A trader might add "Market Impact" and "Risk Assessment". A developer > might add "Architecture Patterns" and "Tech Debt". Make it yours. ## Output Modes | Mode | Trigger | Output | |------|---------|--------| | **Full** (default) | `/analyze [URL]` | All dimensions | | **Sparse** | `/analyze [URL] --sparse` | Only hit dimensions, skip empty | | **Brief** | `/analyze [URL] --brief` | Action items only | ## Best Practices 1. **Scan all dimensions, but don't force-fill** — skip empty dimensions cleanly 2. **Actions must be specific** — not "learn about X" but "read X docs chapter Y" 3. **Distinguish fact from opinion** — mark the author's claims vs verified facts 4. **Source everything** — tag where each insight comes from in the original content 5. **ROI awareness** — not every action is worth doing, assess effort vs impact