discussion

name	discussion
description	Runs structured multi-agent discussions for open-ended automovie topics. Use only when the user explicitly asks for Discussion or a team debate with transcripts and conclusions; do not use for Self-Review, Review Cycle, research review, or issue discovery.

Discussion

Discussion explores a topic without changing code or turning the exchange into a review queue. Reviews and issue discovery use the review skill instead. Use Discussion for reference study and architecture exploration before committing a major interface/engine design.

Team

Form the largest practical team, up to six agents. Give every agent a self-contained brief with the topic, constraints, known evidence, output expectations, and the exact repository instructions and skills to read. Do not give a preferred conclusion or divide the topic into assigned slices.

Knowledge Base

Create .discussions/<topic>/ with a short filesystem-safe name. Do not delete or overwrite an existing discussion directory unless the user explicitly requests it.

Each agent maintains a personal wiki-style subdirectory under the topic directory, built from .references/, whatever .wiki/ already holds, and external sources. Agents read the live transcript and one another's statements between turns, continue researching, and revise their own notes.

Transcript

Run three unrestricted transcript rounds as round1.md, round2.md, and round3.md. The lead moderates and records every statement in speaking order as a live transcript, not a retrospective summary. Do not narrow the topic unless the user does.

After round3.md, the lead writes agreed conclusions, disagreements, and major open points to summary.md, promotes durable findings into .wiki/ with sources cited, reports the result, and waits. Discussion does not itself authorize implementation.