用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow-codex --skill review-spec命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Route setup using exact migration registry [{"unit":"setup/default","routing":{"negative_boundaries":["Do not run setup; only execute deterministic repository verification.","Only assess test coverage, acceptance criteria, flakiness, and verification gaps.","Only review the current code changes for correctness and defects."],"positive_triggers":["Apply the canonical setup workflow and report its evidence.","Help me run the setup workflow for this repository.","I need the canonical setup procedure with its safety boundaries."]}},{"unit":"setup/guidance","routing":{"negative_boundaries":["Do not run setup guidance mode; only execute deterministic repository verification.","Only assess test coverage, acceptance criteria, flakiness, and verification gaps.","Only review the current code changes for correctness and defects."],"positive_triggers":["Apply the canonical setup guidance mode workflow and report its evidence.","Help me run the setup guidance mode workflow for this repository.","I need the canonical setup
Route deep-research using exact migration registry [{"unit":"deep-research/default","routing":{"negative_boundaries":["Answer a narrow repository question using one file.","Implement the recommended database migration strategy.","Trace only the internal execution path without external research."],"positive_triggers":["Compare database migration strategies using official sources, repository constraints, and real-world evidence.","Conduct deep research on this technical decision from multiple independent source types.","Research the current landscape and produce a claim registry with conflicts and confidence."]}}].
Route architecture-advice using exact migration registry [{"unit":"architecture-advice/default","routing":{"negative_boundaries":["Create the feature 3-architecture.md lifecycle document.","Implement the selected architecture in production code.","Write an implementation-ready technical specification and task breakdown."],"positive_triggers":["Compare architecture options for introducing an event bus in this codebase.","Give an independent architecture second opinion on this proposed caching design.","Recommend a component boundary for the billing integration with repository evidence."]}}].
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | review-spec |
| description | Review technical spec documents from completeness, feasibility, risk, and code consistency perspectives. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Grep, Glob, Bash(git:*), Bash(node:*), Agent |
/codex-review-fast)/codex-review-doc)/tech-spec)Agent({
description: "Review technical spec for completeness, feasibility, and risk",
subagent_type: "tech-spec-reviewer",
prompt: `Review the following technical spec document.
Follow the review dimensions and output format defined in this skill.`
})
$ARGUMENTS
| Step | Focus |
|---|---|
| 1 | Read the technical spec |
| 2 | Research related code |
| 3 | Completeness check |
| 4 | Feasibility assessment |
| 5 | Risk review |
| 6 | Code consistency |
| 7 | Test strategy |
# Technical Spec Review Report
**Reviewed Document**: `$ARGUMENTS`
## Review Summary
| Dimension | Rating | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Completeness | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ | |
| Feasibility | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ | |
| Risk Assessment | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ | |
| Code Consistency | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | |
| Test Strategy | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ | |
## Overall Verdict
✅ Approved / ⚠️ Needs revision / ❌ Needs redesign
## Strengths
-
## Issues & Recommendations
### 🔴 Must Fix (Blocker)
### 🟡 Suggested Changes
### 🟢 Optional Improvements