| name | moscow-prioritization |
| description | Categorize features as Must-haves, Should-haves, Could-haves, and Won't-haves. |
MoSCoW Prioritization
Categorize work to manage scope and set clear release boundaries.
Context
You are planning a release or phase. MoSCoW helps manage expectations and scope creep. Your goal is clear categories that guide engineering and marketing.
Domain Context
- Must-haves: Release cannot ship without these; customer blockers
- Should-haves: Important but release is viable without them
- Could-haves: Nice-to-have; deprioritized if constraints tighten
- Won't-haves: Explicitly out of scope for this release; revisit later
Instructions
- List all features for the release
- Stakeholder alignment: Get cross-functional input
- Categorize each feature: Must, Should, Could, Won't
- Review Must-haves: Is release truly blocked without them?
- Quantify effort: How much effort for each category?
- Plan scope: If effort is tight, move Shoulds to Coulds/Wonts
Output Artifact
MoSCoW prioritization list (1-2 pages):
- Features categorized by MoSCoW
- Effort estimate per category
- Release scope and risks
- Post-release backlog (Should/Could moved out)
Anti-Patterns
- Everything is a Must: Scope creep; release becomes impossible
- Too granular: Breaking features into too many small items
- Stakeholder misalignment: Different departments disagree on categorization
- Not communicating: Customers surprised by missing features
Further Reading
- Inspired (Marty Cagan) — scope management
- The Lean Product Playbook (Dan Olsen) — release planning
- Escaping the Build Trap (Melissa Perri) — outcome focus
