菜单
Interpret financial statements through Warren Buffett's durable competitive advantage lens — income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow analysis with the equity bond valuation framework. Use this skill when evaluating a company's financial health or screening for a long-term investment.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | buffett-financials |
| description | Interpret financial statements through Warren Buffett's durable competitive advantage lens — income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow analysis with the equity bond valuation framework. Use this skill when evaluating a company's financial health or screening for a long-term investment. |
| allowed-tools | yfinance_*, Bash, Read, qmd_* |
Framework from Warren Buffett and the Interpretation of Financial Statements by Mary Buffett and David Clark (Scribner, 2008).
Warren divides businesses into two groups: those with a durable competitive advantage and those without. The DCA creates monopoly-like economics — the company can charge more or sell more than competitors. Durability (consistency over time) is the key to wealth creation.
| ($ in millions) | |
|---|---|
| Revenue | $10,000 |
| Cost of Goods Sold | 3,000 |
| Gross Profit | 7,000 |
| Operating Expenses | |
| Selling, General & Admin. | 2,100 |
| Research & Development | 1,000 |
| Depreciation | 700 |
| Operating Profit | 3,200 |
| Interest Expense | 200 |
| Gain (Loss) Sale Assets | 1,275 |
| Other | 225 |
| Income Before Tax | 1,500 |
| Income Taxes Paid | 525 |
| Net Earnings | $975 |
Formula: Gross Profit ÷ Total Revenues = Gross Profit Margin
DCA examples: Coca-Cola 60%+, Moody's 73%, Burlington Northern 61%, Wrigley 51%
Non-DCA examples: United Airlines 14%, GM 21%, U.S. Steel 17%, Goodyear 20%
Rule: ≥ 40% → possible DCA; below 40% → competitive industry; ≤ 20% → fiercely competitive. Track 10 years for consistency.
As % of gross profit: Moody's 25%, Coca-Cola 59%, P&G 61%. Companies without DCA show wild variation (GM 28-83%, Ford 89-780%).
Rule: Under 30% is fantastic. 30-80% can still be DCA. Near/exceeding 100% → highly competitive.
Companies that must spend heavily on R&D have an inherent flaw — patents expire, tech gets replaced.
Merck: 29% of gross profit on R&D + 49% on SGA = 78% total. Intel: ~30% on R&D. Moody's: no R&D. Coca-Cola: no R&D.
Rule: Heavy R&D = long-term economics at risk. Warren is not interested.
Warren believes depreciation is a very real expense. DCA companies have lower depreciation as % of gross profit: Coca-Cola ~6%, Wrigley ~7%, P&G ~8%. GM: 22-57%.
Warren on EBITDA: "Using EBITDA, our clever Wall Street types are ignoring that eventually the printing press will wear out."
DCA companies carry little/no interest expense. P&G: 8% of operating income. Wrigley: 7%. Goodyear: 49%.
Southwest Airlines: 9% (competitive advantage in its industry) vs United 61% vs American 92%.
Rule: In any industry, the company with the lowest ratio of interest payments to operating income usually has the competitive advantage.
Rule: > 20% net earnings on total revenues → good chance of DCA. < 10% → highly competitive.
Coca-Cola: 21%, Moody's: 31%, Southwest: 7%, GM: 3%.
Exception: banks/financial companies — high ratio can mean slacking in risk management.
10 years of consistent upward trend = DCA. Erratic earnings with losses = highly competitive industry prone to boom/bust.
Lots of cash + little/no debt from ongoing operations (not one-time events) → DCA. Check 7 years of balance sheets.
DCA products never become obsolete. Inventory and net earnings rising together → profitable growth. Wild swings → boom/bust.
DCA companies don't constantly upgrade. Wrigley builds a gum plant and uses it until it wears out. GM constantly retools.
Rule: DCA companies carry little or no long-term debt. Should be able to pay off all long-term debt within 3-4 years of net earnings.
Coca-Cola and Moody's: 1 year. Wrigley and Wash Post: 2 years. GM/Ford: couldn't pay it off with 10 years of earnings.
Presence of treasury shares + history of buybacks = good indicator of DCA.
Rate of growth is a good DCA indicator: Coke 7.9%, Wrigley 10.9%, Burlington Northern 15.6%, Wells Fargo 14.2%, Berkshire 23%.
Formula: Net Earnings ÷ Shareholders' Equity = ROE
DCA examples: Coca-Cola 30%, Wrigley 24%, Hershey 33%, Pepsi 34%.
Non-DCA: United (profitable year) 15%, American 4%.
Rule: High returns on equity → "come play." Low returns → "stay away."
Formula: Total Liabilities ÷ Shareholders' Equity
Problem for DCA identification: DCA companies buy back shares, reducing equity, inflating the ratio. Moody's has negative equity.
Solution — Treasury Share-Adjusted Ratio: Add treasury stock back to shareholders' equity, then recalculate.
Adjusted ratios: P&G .71, Wrigley .68, Goodyear 4.35, Ford 38.0.
Rule (non-financial): Adjusted D/E below .80 → good chance of DCA.
DCA companies often have current ratios below 1.0. Moody's .64, Coca-Cola .95, P&G .82.
Rule: Of little use in identifying DCA — their earning power lets them cover liabilities easily.
Avoid businesses that use lots of leverage to generate earnings. Leverage can make a mediocre company appear to have a competitive advantage.
Key metric: Add total capex for 10 years and compare to total net earnings for same period.
DCA examples: Coca-Cola 19%, Moody's 5%, Wrigley 49%, Altria 20%, P&G 28%, Pepsi 36%, Amex 23%.
Non-DCA: GM 444%, Goodyear 950%.
Rule: ≤ 50% of net earnings for capex → good place to look for DCA. ≤ 25% → more than likely has DCA.
History of repurchasing shares → good DCA indicator. Look on cash flow statement under "Issuance (Retirement) of Stock, Net."
A DCA company's shares = an "equity bond" with an ever-increasing coupon.
Equity Bond Value = Pretax Earnings per share ÷ Long-Term Corporate Bond Rate
Example (Coca-Cola 2007): Pretax $3.96 ÷ 6.5% = ~$60/share. Stock traded $45-64.
The DCA causes earnings to increase year after year. The stock market eventually revalues the shares to reflect this.
| Metric | What to Look For |
|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | ≥ 40%, consistent for 10 years |
| Net Earnings / Revenue | > 20% (non-financial) |
| Capex / Net Earnings | ≤ 50%; ≤ 25% is ideal |
| Long-Term Debt | Payable in 3-4 years of earnings |
| Adjusted D/E Ratio | < .80 (non-financial) |
| ROE | Consistently high (e.g., 20%+) |
| R&D | Low or none |
| Interest / Operating Income | Lowest in industry |
| Per-Share Earnings | 10-year consistent upward trend |
| Retained Earnings Growth | Positive, consistent growth |
| Share Buybacks | History of repurchasing shares |
| Cash + Debt | Lots of cash, little/no debt from operations |
Fetch free long-term U.S. company financial data from the SEC EDGAR REST API — filing histories, company metadata (CIK, SIC, tickers, exchanges), and standardized XBRL financials (revenue, assets, EPS, cash flow) over many years for any U.S. filer. Use this skill when the user asks about a public company's SEC filings, fundamentals, historical financial statements, or wants to compare a metric across companies, even if they don't mention EDGAR, the SEC, or XBRL by name. No API key required.
Fetch Euronext stock option chains — search for optionable instruments, discover available expiry dates, and pull full option chains (calls/puts with strikes, bids, asks, lasts, settlements) for any Euronext-listed equity option. Use this skill when the user asks about European stock options, Euronext option chains, LEAPS on European equities, or wants to scan option prices across expiries for stocks like Shell, TotalEnergies, Airbus, or Heineken, even if they don't mention Euronext by name.
Query ACARA My School data for every Australian school — school profiles, student-to-teacher ratios, neighbourhood demographic indicators (ICSEA), enrolments, and locations with coordinates. Use this skill when the user asks about schools near a property, what schools exist in a postcode or suburb, student-to-teacher ratios, or neighbourhood character via school demographics, even if they don't mention ACARA or My School directly.
Fetch Japanese stock option chain data from the Osaka Exchange via JPX. Use this skill when the user wants to see option prices, implied volatility, or strikes for a listed Japanese company — including evaluating protective puts, covered calls, or hedging strategies for TSE stocks. Accepts a 4-digit security code (e.g., 6146 for Disco Corp, 7203 for Toyota). Supports both the nearest and subsequent monthly expiries.
Create detailed business overviews for investment research — deep-dive through business model, management, financials, valuation, risks and tracking. Use this skill only when the user explicitly asks to do a business overview, deep dive, or formal company write-up.
Evaluate spinoffs, merger securities, post-bankruptcy orphan equities, corporate restructurings, stub stocks, recapitalizations, rights offerings, and LEAPS/warrants in extraordinary corporate events. Use this skill when the user asks about a company undergoing a corporate change, mentions a spinoff, merger consideration, post-reorg stock, going-private transaction, Dutch auction tender, rights offering, or corporate breakup, even if they don't name the event type explicitly.
