用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/stanfish06/skillquarium --skill dcf命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
build a repo-local skill and install a matching iterated coding-agent GitHub Actions workflow, prompt, memory file, and reference templates
interview the user to design an agentic control loop (sensor, controller, actuator under disturbances) tailored to their codebase, then build it as locally-runnable components plus a scheduled coding-agent workflow
narrow React component prop types to match live code paths
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | dcf |
| description | Discounted cash flow valuation with sensitivity analysis |
Build a discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation for the company named in the user's request. If no ticker or company is provided, ask for one before proceeding.
Before starting, read ../data-access.md for data access methods and ../design-system.md for formatting conventions. Follow the data access detection logic and design system throughout this skill.
Follow these steps:
Look up the company by ticker using discover_companies. Capture:
company_idlatest_calendar_quarter — anchor for all period calculations below (see ../data-access.md Section 1.5)latest_fiscal_quarter../data-access.md Section 4.5Get market-side inputs for {TICKER} (see ../data-access.md Section 2 for how to source market data in your environment):
If market data is unavailable, use reasonable defaults: beta=1.0, risk-free rate=4.5%, and note the assumptions.
Calculate 8 quarters backward from latest_calendar_quarter. Pull:
Also pull segment revenue and any available guidance series.
Cost of Equity (CAPM):
Cost of Debt:
Capital Structure:
Show all inputs and the resulting WACC clearly.
Before projecting top-down, attempt a bottoms-up revenue build using operational KPIs. This produces a significantly more defensible DCF — a top-down trend decay is a guess; a bottoms-up KPI build is analysis.
Discover segment and KPI data: Pull segment revenue breakdown + segment-specific KPIs for the target company. Use the sector taxonomy to know what to search for:
Build bottoms-up projections per segment: For each segment with KPI data, project revenue using unit economics:
Sum segment projections to get total revenue for each of 5 years. Show the build clearly so the reader can challenge individual segment assumptions.
Fall back to top-down if KPIs aren't available. If segment KPIs are sparse or unavailable, use the top-down approach in Section 5b instead, but note explicitly that the model is less reliable without bottoms-up drivers.
Build 5-year FCF projections. If a projection engine is available (see ../data-access.md Section 5), use it. Otherwise, project manually:
Show all assumptions clearly — this is the most judgment-intensive part. If using this fallback instead of the KPI-driven build (Section 5a), note the limitation.
Calculate terminal value using perpetuity growth method:
Also compute:
Build a sensitivity table varying two key inputs:
WACC (rows): Base WACC ± 2% in 0.5% increments (7 rows) Terminal Growth Rate (columns): 1.5% to 4.0% in 0.5% increments (6 columns)
Each cell = implied share price at that WACC/growth combination. Highlight the base case cell and the current market price for reference.
Also show a secondary sensitivity: Revenue Growth vs FCF Margin if data supports it.
If consensus estimates are available (see ../data-access.md Section 3):
If consensus data is not available, skip this check.
Flag any issues:
Challenge your own assumptions — don't anchor to the current price:
Save to reports/{TICKER}_dcf.html using the HTML report template from ../design-system.md. Write the full analysis as styled HTML with the design system CSS inlined. This is the final deliverable — no intermediate markdown step needed.
Structure the report with these sections:
<h1>{Company Name} ({TICKER}) — DCF Valuation</h1>
<p>Generated: {date}</p>
<h2>Summary</h2>
<table>
| Metric | Value |
| Current Price | $XXX |
| Implied Share Price | $XXX |
| Upside / Downside | +X.X% / -X.X% |
| WACC | X.X% |
| Terminal Growth | X.X% |
| Terminal Value % of Total | XX% |
</table>
<h2>WACC Calculation</h2>
<table>
| Component | Value | Source |
| Risk-Free Rate | X.X% | FRED 10Y Treasury |
| Equity Risk Premium | 5.5% | Standard assumption |
| Beta | X.XX | Market data |
| Cost of Equity | X.X% | CAPM |
| Cost of Debt (after-tax) | X.X% | Interest/Debt × (1-t) |
| Equity Weight | XX% | Market cap |
| Debt Weight | XX% | Total debt |
| **WACC** | **X.X%** | |
</table>
<h2>Historical Free Cash Flow (8 Quarters)</h2>
<table>
| Metric | Q1 | Q2 | ... | Q8 |
{OCF, CapEx, FCF, FCF Margin — with Daloopa citations}
</table>
<h2>FCF Projections (5 Years)</h2>
<table>
| Metric | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 |
{Revenue, FCF Margin, FCF — with assumptions noted}
</table>
<h2>Valuation Bridge</h2>
<table>
| Component | Value |
| PV of Projected FCFs | $XXX |
| PV of Terminal Value | $XXX |
| Enterprise Value | $XXX |
| Less: Net Debt | ($XXX) |
| Equity Value | $XXX |
| Shares Outstanding | XXX |
| **Implied Share Price** | **$XXX** |
</table>
<h2>Sensitivity Table: WACC vs Terminal Growth</h2>
<table>
| WACC \ Growth | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% | 3.5% | 4.0% |
{matrix of implied share prices, base case bolded}
</table>
<p>Current market price: $XXX for reference.</p>
<h2>Key Assumptions & Risks</h2>
<ul>{List all key assumptions and what could invalidate them}</ul>
<h2>Sanity Checks</h2>
<ul>{Implied multiples vs historical, terminal value concentration, etc.}</ul>
All financial figures must use Daloopa citation format: <a href="https://daloopa.com/src/{fundamental_id}">$X.XX million</a>
Tell the user where the HTML report was saved.
Summarize: implied price vs current price, key upside/downside drivers, and the biggest sensitivity.