菜单
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan before building, or uses any grill trigger phrases.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Drive a subject to convergence by repeatedly completing its critique-generated Dex epic, re-running the same critique, and reporting what changed — until it's clean or hits a stop condition. Use when asked to "loop the critique", "keep fixing until clean", "re-critique after the fixes", "iterate on the design/UX until it converges", "complete the epic then re-run the critic", or "run the critique loop". Works with any critique that emits the shared report contract (ui-design-critique, ux-critique, …).
Design critique for user interfaces that produces a prioritized, strict report of design issues. Use when asked to "critique this design", "review the UI", "design review", "roast my UI", "is this AI slop", "does this look AI-generated", "audit the visual design", or evaluate a screen, page, or screenshot against brand guidelines or a DESIGN.md spec. Classifies every finding as a gap, inconsistency, suggestion, or strength and ranks it by impact. Runs deterministic DOM detectors to catch broken layout (overflow, overlap, clipping) and evaluates visually via browser/devtools capture and against design tokens.
Convert a prioritized critique or findings report into a Dex epic with tasks. Use when asked to "turn this critique into tasks", "make a dex epic from these findings", "create tasks from the design review", "add these to dex", or "backlog this critique". Works with any prioritized findings list — including the ui-design-critique report — by normalizing to a common contract, then creating a Dex epic with priority-ranked, well-contextualized tasks.
Interview the user to create a unique DESIGN.md that defines an app's look. Use when asked to "grill me for a design.md", "create a design spec", "define the app's look", "make a DESIGN.md", "build a brand/design system doc", or "interview me for a visual identity". Grills one question at a time toward a committed, non-generic identity, then authors a valid DESIGN.md (tokens + prose) and lints it. Actively steers away from AI-slop defaults.
Interview the user to define who an app's users actually are. Use when asked to "define our users", "identify the users", "who is this for", "create user personas", "make a USERS.md", "define the target audience", or "what user types do we have". Grills one question at a time to produce a USERS.md — multiple distinct user types with their goals, context, proficiency, motivations, frustrations, and the cues that make each feel "this is for me".
UX critique for interfaces and flows that produces a prioritized, strict report of experience issues. Use when asked to "critique the UX", "UX review", "usability review", "heuristic evaluation", "why is this flow confusing", "is this hard to use", "find friction", or evaluate whether a user can complete a task. Walks the actual flow, classifies every finding as a gap, inconsistency, suggestion, or strength, and ranks by impact on task success. Flags dark patterns. Shares the critique report contract with ui-design-critique so critique-to-dex ingests it directly.
| name | grilling |
| description | Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design. Use when the user wants to stress-test a plan before building, or uses any grill trigger phrases. |
Interview the user relentlessly about every aspect of a plan until you reach shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one by one.
Use this shape for each turn:
Question: [one consequential decision]
Recommended answer: [your best answer, with a brief reason]