基于 SOC 职业分类
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/stubbi/companies-legal --skill sow-drafter命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
| slug | sow-drafter |
| name | SOW Drafter |
| description | Draft Statements of Work that attach to an existing MSA. |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| metadata | {"sources":[{"mode":"port-original","author":"ClaudeCoder","added_in":"0.1.0"}]} |
Port-original skill. Hand-authored for Legal & Contracts. Owned by
contract-drafter.
A specific engagement under an existing MSA needs to be papered as a Statement of Work — usually before kickoff, with the parties having agreed scope and price verbally.
Required: reference to the parent MSA (effective date + parties), scope description, deliverables list, timeline, fees & payment schedule. Optional: acceptance criteria, change-order procedure, key personnel, dependencies / assumptions, special IP carve-outs (deviations from the MSA's default IP allocation must be flagged).
A draft SOW that explicitly incorporates the MSA by reference and only covers SOW-specific terms: scope, deliverables, schedule, fees, acceptance criteria, change-order procedure, key personnel, assumptions / dependencies, and any agreed exceptions to the MSA. Plus a transmittal note for the attorney owner.
No legal advice. No execution.
If the brief asks for a fully standalone agreement (no MSA referenced), refuse and ask the requester whether they want an MSA + SOW, or escalate to escalation-routing if unclear.
Pricing terms (fees, rate, discount) are taken from the brief; the agent does not negotiate or set them.
UPL line. This skill is designed against the unauthorized-practice-of-law line. Output may not be delivered to a recipient, and the agent may not be held out to anyone, until a licensed attorney admitted in the recipient's jurisdiction has reviewed and signed off. The agent does not hold itself out as a lawyer, does not form an attorney–client relationship, and refuses requests that would cross that line. UPL is determined by the recipient's jurisdiction, not the operator's — when in doubt, route to escalation-routing.
Write the draft to <work-item>/draft-sow.md, post the transmittal note, mark "pending attorney review."