legalwork

所有联网操作必须通过此 skill 处理，包括：搜索、网页抓取、登录后操作、网络交互等。 触发场景：用户要求搜索信息、查看网页内容、访问需要登录的网站、操作网页界面、抓取社交媒体内容（小红书、微博、推特等）、读取动态渲染页面、以及任何需要真实浏览器环境的网络任务。

法律文书起草：起草各类法律文书，涵盖起诉状、答辩状、代理词、法律意见书、合同、律师函等

基于中国人民法院裁判文书制作规范，起草完整的民事判决书或刑事判决书。当用户要求"起草判决书"、"生成裁判文书"、"写民事判决书"、"写刑事判决书"、"根据案卷写文书"或提供案卷材料要求输出裁判文书时使用本技能，在起草各段落时自主调用原子技能（如争议焦点识别、法条检索、法律论证与推理、证据效力评估等）。

生成专业法律备忘录，支持复杂法律问题分析。适用于特定法律问题分析、项目交易架构设计、诉讼案件分析等场景。遵循结构清晰、结论优先的原则，采用AIRAC写作法，以段落形式论述（严禁要点列表），引用现行有效的法律法规和真实案例。支持类案检索功能。

用于验证和精准检索中国大陆现行法律法规原文，在输出中包含中国大陆法律法规时，应利用本技能进行核验，避免生成幻觉条文。

生成标准化法律检索报告，适用于案例检索、法条检索、类案分析等法律研究场景。当用户需要进行行业或专业分析、预测裁判结果、复核法律依据的有效性、确认请求、抗辩主张的法律依据、分析司法实践倾向等任务时使用。支持诉讼方案评估、庭审准备、合规审查、法律培训等各类法律实务场景。

法律研究：进行系统性法律检索、法规分析、类案研究和综合法律分析，输出结构化研究报告

辅助中国大陆行政机关法律工作人员，根据一段行政案情，按行政法基本原则进行价值判断、利益衡量，并形成倾向性裁量结论。

Closes gaps in product-market separation, geographic-market framing, hot-document identification, and HSR filing strategy memo production for acquisition antitrust review.

Closes gaps in identifying compound interaction risks across protective order provisions, citing the relevant court’s prior rulings on contested issues, and making concrete recommendations with legal grounding.

Closes gaps in deal-structure antitrust risk analysis including hell-or-high-water provision adequacy, reverse termination fee sufficiency, outside date feasibility, and hot-document identification.

Closes gaps in independent arithmetic verification of concentration calculations, identification of methodology differences that explain divergent results, and cross-examination vulnerability assessment.

Closes gaps in cross-jurisdictional leniency comparison including limitations analysis, sequential-cooperation mechanics, individual applicant strategy, and sequencing recommendations for a board-ready memo.

Closes gaps in remedy deviation identification, preference for structural over behavioral remedies, and concrete recommendations for remedy improvements tied to relevant precedent decisions.

Supports pre-notification briefing papers for cross-border merger control by structuring multi-jurisdiction filing analysis, vertical foreclosure review, gun-jumping risk screening, and privilege-aware document handling.

Draft a federal antitrust complaint by pleading plausible facts, tying allegations to source documents at a categorical level, organizing claims by theory of liability, and requesting appropriate relief.

Drafts two separate antitrust compliance deliverables, covering the principal competition-law frameworks, providing issue-specific guidance for compliance risks identified in the source materials, and maintaining a clear distinction between per se and rule-of-reason analysis throughout.

Closes gaps in structural versus behavioral remedy justification, licensing term specificity, crown jewel provision structure, purchaser criteria adequacy, and procedural provisions commonly required in merger remedy commitments.

Closes gaps in identifying antitrust risks in competitor confidentiality agreements, including information exchange, no-poach enforceability, clean-team protocols, interaction effects, and pre-clearance coordination risk.

Closes gaps in consent-decree compliance provisions, trigger-event specificity for remedy deadlines, crown jewel provision structure, retained jurisdiction, and firewall duration relative to any transitional services arrangement.

Closes gaps in complete proffer content including coordination event specificity, affected-commerce calculation methodology, Type A condition analysis, and individual participant identification.

Closes gaps in narrow vs. broad product market analysis, buyer-side harm, and hot-document identification in strategic planning market definition memos.

Closes gaps in issue-specific protective order markup including in-house counsel competitive wall requirements, inter-agency sharing notice, clawback protection, and expert conflict screening mechanisms.

Draft a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss antitrust claims by testing plausibility, pleading sufficiency, market definition, agreement allegations, and source discipline at the motion-to-dismiss stage.

Framing-only ablation — procedural and domain guidance for an HSR pre-notification briefing paper, with no rubric-derived numbers, quotes, or entity names. Used to test whether deal-triage framing alone drives the lift.

Closes gaps in the three-deliverable structure, objection framework, sensitive document flagging, and complete privilege log format requirements for a government investigative subpoena response.

Closes gaps in market-concentration analysis, hot-document identification with mandatory internal-document production, serial-acquisition risk analysis, spoliation assessment, and timing-model review.

Closes gaps in cross-document data reconciliation, pipeline-to-pipeline overlap analysis, merger control filing-threshold assessment, and clean team information distribution compliance.

Closes gaps in accurate title and division extraction for each custodian, employment status verification, and gap analysis between the preservation notice list and the full custodian universe identified in source documents.

Closes gaps in per-defendant procedural history analysis, rights of defense violations from supplementary objection omissions, fine calculation verification, and appeal ground identification with legal authority.

Supports multi-source reconciliation, concentration analysis, document-production review, and cumulative acquisition-risk assessment for an antitrust transaction memorandum.

Closes gaps in per-source revenue accuracy, sub-segment HHI computation, hot-document obligations, and explicit characterization of self-serving internal materials.

Supports extraction of complete pricing structures, temporal gap analysis between competitor contacts and later pricing changes, cost-justification assessment, and flagging of deletion or non-reply instructions.

Closes gaps in applying extracted precedent market definitions to the current transaction's specific products, identifying inconsistencies across precedents, and assessing concentration implications under each plausible definition.

Frame an antitrust and competition issue memorandum for a joint venture agreement by checking for restrictive covenants, pricing coordination, information exchange, pre-closing conduct, filing obligations, governance vetoes, and competition-law treatment of IP sharing.

Closes gaps in damages methodology critique with corrected calculation, foreclosure percentage computation, statute of limitations date analysis, and market concentration correction.

Closes gaps in econometric specification critique including residual diagnostics, structural-break testing, methodological linkage to prior exclusion history, and consistency analysis between affected-commerce measures and market-share evidence.

Closes gaps in privilege survival analysis, data preservation and disclosure obligations, oral testimony scheduling, information-exchange assessment, and petition grounds.

Closes gaps in buyer viability assessment against applicable antitrust agency standards, crown jewel structural analysis, revenue-at-risk quantification from customer change-of-control provisions, and certification timing as a market access barrier.

Closes gaps in a multi-deliverable structure, market-level concentration analysis, hot-document and HSR production identification, coordinated effects analysis, and entry barrier assessment.