Skip to main content

sol-loop:开 PR 前的 GPT Sol 循环

用 GPT Sol 对代码改动做有限轮次的评审,逐项判断意见,只做必要的最小修改,并拒绝无关的范围扩张。

来源信息

仓库
t3dotgg/tstack
最近来源活动
2026年10月24日 05:00
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
3,032
Forks
219

用途

需要在开 PR 前后复核一组明确的代码改动时,提出 sol loop 请求。

必要前提

可调用真正的 GPT Sol 评审者,已确定的差异范围和基准,以及相关本地检查。源文档不允许自行换成其他模型。

操作说明

明确差异范围并完成相关检查。默认由一名评审者最多审三轮;逐项判断意见后做必要修改,后续只复核新改动与未解决问题。

限制

仅在指定高影响问题未解决或用户要求时扩展至五轮。只剩细枝末节建议时停止;推送仍须符合用户授权。

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
sol-loop
description
Use when the user says "sol loop".
# sol-loop This is a workflow for making your code changes more correct before (or sometimes after) filing a pull request. tl;dr - use OpenAI's GPT Sol to review your code in a loop. Make the most minimal possible changes to appease the Sol reviewers. Be careful of scope creep and don't be scared to push back. ## Budget - Default: 3 rounds total. Round 1 is full. Later rounds check only changed code and open findings. - Extend to 5 only for security, permissions, auth, data loss, or state/concurrency, while a blocker or should stays open with evidence. Or when the user asks. - Stop early if a round returns only nits. Declined nits and comment, doc, or format-only fixes need no new round. - One reviewer only. Sol must not start subagents or reviewers. - Keep a ledger: id, severity, outcome, usage if returned. Never guess it. ## 1. Scope Run `git status --short`. Do not stash, discard, or include unrelated changes. Limit review to the change paths if they separate cleanly. Otherwise stop and ask. Find the base after `git fetch origin`: - PR: `gh pr view <n> --json baseRefName,headRefOid`. Check out the branch only if clean. Confirm `HEAD` is the PR head, or ahead only by this change. Base: `git merge-base HEAD origin/<baseRefName>`. - Local: `git merge-base HEAD origin/<default-branch>`. No remote: a base the user names, or `HEAD` for uncommitted changes only. The change is base to working tree in those paths, with untracked files. Use one diff command all rounds. State intent and out-of-scope in 1-2 sentences. Run covering checks. Do not send code this change breaks. Note missing or pre-failing checks in the brief. ## 2. Start Sol In T3, call `orchestrator_capabilities`. Pick the latest Sol unless the user named a version. Do not hardcode an ID. Record provider, model, and effort only if exposed. Use `delegate_task` every round (`role: "review"`, `mode: "async"`). Save `taskId`. New `clientRequestId` per round. `childThreadId` is storage, not the next target. Do not use `t3_thread_send`, `create_threads`, or `t3_thread_launch` for review. If T3 tools are not listed, try one direct capability call. Outside T3, use a native Sol subagent and keep its ID. In Claude Code, use a custom subagent only if it is set up to run Sol. If no route runs Sol, report the blocker. Do not substitute a model. Do not edit scoped files while review runs. Wait for the notice. Do not poll or start a second reviewer. Timeout, error, or no reply is not approval. On failure, cancel, verify stop, restart with the ledger. Round 1 brief (T3 children get no history): ``` Review only. Do not edit, commit, push, comment on PRs, or start subagents. Repo: <abs path> Base: <sha> Intent: <intent> Out of scope: <scope> Checks: <results> See: git diff <base> [-- <paths>]; git status --short (read untracked). Read surrounding code. Find bugs, broken callers, mismatch with intent. Skip style unless it hides a bug. Hold to the smallest change. Flag code, tests, or guards the intent does not need. Other paths, rare cases, small perf, extra compat: nits. blocker = intended case wrong. should = real bug callers will hit, in intent. nit = rest. Reply: VERDICT: APPROVE or CHANGES S1 [blocker|should|nit] <file>:<line> <claim>. Fix: <suggestion> (stable ids) ``` ## 3. Answer findings Check each finding and severity yourself. Another path, rare case, or small cost is a nit, whatever label it came with. - Agree: smallest fix. Prefer delete or narrow over new lock, cache, helper, or option. Fix the case that happened. Add one focused test that fails without the fix, if intent needs it. - Disagree: say why, with evidence (file:line, test, output). - Out of scope or nit: decline in one line. List as follow-up. Update the ledger. Re-run checks and `git diff --shortstat <base>`. If review grew the diff, cut first. Do not agree just to end the loop. ## 4. Next round Start one only if budget remains and a blocker or should is open, behavior code changed, or approval does not cover the current behavior diff. Use a fresh `delegate_task` in T3, or follow up the saved native ID. Send the round 1 brief, the ledger (`fixed:` / `disagree:` / `declined:` + evidence), the same base diff, and the change since last round. Tell Sol: open ids and changed code only. Mark each old id `resolved` or `still open: <reason>`. ## 5. Stop and ship Agreed: APPROVE on the current behavior diff, no blocker or should open, no concern of your own. Stuck: an item stays disputed after two replies, or budget ends. Show both sides in 2-3 lines each. The user decides. Budget end is not approval. Do not push during the loop. Push after agreement only if the user asked to push, ship, or update the PR. If you push to a PR, add above the model blurb: `Reviewed with sol-loop: <N> rounds with <model>. Sol verdict: approved`. Add `on <effort>` only if verified. Report: rounds, model, what Sol changed, diff size before/after, fixed and declined findings with reasons, usage if exposed (else say not), pushed or not.
在 GitHub 查看