菜单
Use when the research task is in astronomy — observational astronomy, surveys, photometry and astrophysical inference — at study design, analysis or writing. Astronomy: the figure is the unit of result, and nothing is reported pooled
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/tangxiangru/AutoR --skill astronomy-figure-is-the-unit-of-result命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Use when writing results and discussion, and when a task or a reviewer asks why an effect happens rather than whether it does. Covers the difference between reporting an effect and accounting for it, and what a mechanism claim needs behind it.
Use when the supplied data looks synthetic, degraded, incomplete or wrong, and whenever you are tempted to reframe the study around what you found about the inputs, the harness or the evaluation. Covers what to do with a real data problem without losing the study.
Use when planning figures, at study design and again before writing. Covers the figures a paper in this field is expected to contain, why an original figure does not substitute for a standard one, and how to decide what to draw first.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | astronomy-figure-is-the-unit-of-result |
| description | Use when the research task is in astronomy — observational astronomy, surveys, photometry and astrophysical inference — at study design, analysis or writing. Astronomy: the figure is the unit of result, and nothing is reported pooled |
Draft your figure list before your analysis list. In observational astronomy the result is delivered as a figure a reader can lay beside the published one: the same quantities on both axes, the same log or linear scaling, the same decade span, the full family of competing models or method variants overlaid on one set of axes, the decision threshold drawn as a labelled line, and a caption stating the numbers a reader would otherwise have to read off the plot (N, median, confidence level, how many points fall each side of the line). A result that is scientifically equivalent but visually reorganised, or that exists only as a table or a sentence, will not be recognised as that result.
Nothing is reported only as an aggregate. Break every quantity down by the sub-population the data physically distinguish, per object, per source class, per component index, per bin of the independent variable, quantify the trend across that index, and say which component dominates the budget and by what factor. Where several independent indicators, models or approximations exist for one quantity, put them all on a single axis and quantify their disagreement; where two independent routes measure the same object, state the consistency with a significance.
Present the result as a curve over the scanned variable across its full plausible range, log axes when it spans decades, and state the interval over which the claim actually holds, rather than a value at one point.
Seven of Astronomy's twelve criteria are image-typed and carry 60% of the weight, judged by a vision model that is shown the original figure first. The measured mechanism 'right numbers, wrong artifact class' cost a whole criterion: the agent had the residual information in prose and in a differently-shaped bar chart and scored near zero because the demanded panel was never drawn. The decomposition clause fixes the recurring aggregate-only loss, and the single-axis multi-indicator clause fixes the case where the canonical multi-model comparison figure was never produced (score 0) because the agent's own question did not need it.