菜单
Use when the task is to reproduce, replicate or re-implement a published study, at design time and when reporting results. Covers what a reproduction must report, how to compare against the source study's numbers, and why the reproduction comes before any improvement.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/tangxiangru/AutoR --skill reproduce-then-extend命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | reproduce-then-extend |
| description | Use when the task is to reproduce, replicate or re-implement a published study, at design time and when reporting results. Covers what a reproduction must report, how to compare against the source study's numbers, and why the reproduction comes before any improvement. |
When the task is to reproduce published work, the deliverable is not "a good study of this topic". It is: the same quantities, measured the same way, reported next to the published ones, with the agreement or disagreement stated.
Build it early and keep it visible:
| quantity | published | ours | agree? |
One row per quantity the source study reports and this task asks for. Fill the
published column at the literature stage, before you have your own numbers —
that ordering is what keeps the comparison honest, because a target read after
the fact tends to become the answer you find.
Where you cannot recompute a published value, say so in the row rather than leaving it blank. Where your number disagrees, say by how much and give your best account of why; a disagreement you explain is a finding, and one you omit is an error the reader will find for you.
If you see a better method, the order still matters: reproduce what the paper did, report it, and then show your improvement as a separate result against your own reproduction. An improvement reported without the reproduction leaves the reader unable to tell whether you beat the paper or measured something else.
Reproduce every arm the task names, not the one that worked. A reproduction that covers one of three models is a reproduction of one third of the study, and the missing two are what the reader notices.
