用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/telorun/telo --skill refine命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | refine |
| description | Surface concrete options to refine or refactor a given package. Read-only analysis; does not modify files. |
Do NOT modify any files. This is a read-only analysis task.
The user will supply a package path (or name) as $ARGUMENTS. If $ARGUMENTS is empty or ambiguous (e.g. just a name that matches multiple locations), ask the user to clarify before proceeding.
Resolve $ARGUMENTS to a concrete directory. Packages typically live under modules/<name>/, kernel/, cli/, sdk/, analyzer/, apps/, or ide/. If the argument is a bare name, check modules/<name>/ first. Confirm the resolved path before spawning the agent.
Use the Agent tool to spawn the refiner agent with the following prompt:
Examine the package at
<resolved path>and surface concrete options to refine or refactor it.Rules:
- Do NOT modify any files.
- Ground every option in specific file paths and line ranges from the package.
- Consider both Telo's core architectural goals (polyglot, visual editing, performance, static analysis) and general code-quality refinement categories (cohesion, duplication, abstraction fit, dead code, naming, error handling, test coverage, docs drift).
- Rate each option's impact and effort independently, sort by impact-to-effort ratio (best first), and call out quick wins (large impact, small effort) up top.
Read CLAUDE.md for architectural context.
Follow the response structure defined in your agent instructions (Package summary / Refinement options / Out of scope / Open questions).
Relay the refiner's output to the user verbatim, preserving its structure (keep the Quick wins section prominent). Do not collapse options and do not start implementing. After presenting, recommend starting with the quick wins if any were identified, then ask the user which option(s) they want to pursue — and wait for an explicit go-ahead before making any changes.