菜单
Verify UK law citations — primarily case law via neutral citation format (UKSC, UKHL, EWCA, EWHC, UKUT) against BAILII, plus UK statutes against legislation.gov.uk — and return verdict JSON.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill uk-law命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Use when retrieving arbitration institutional rules (ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC, HKIAC, VIAC, МКАС/МАК при ТПП України, UNCITRAL) — fetching current version, verifying redaction applicable to the date of arbitration agreement, constructing URLs for official rule texts
Use when choosing the Polish legal regime for letters, requests, applications, complaints, petitions, public-information requests, KPA filings, PPSA complaints, RODO access requests, registry extracts, court-file access, tax/ZUS/cudzoziemcy/USC procedures, or professional lawyer letters. Prevents mixing UDIP, KPA, PPSA, RODO, registry, special-procedure, and advocate/radca letter regimes.
Use when preparing applications for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Poland, applications for setting aside arbitral awards under KPC art. 1205–1211, or opposing such applications — mapping Article V of the 1958 New York Convention to art. 1214–1215 of the Polish KPC, identifying grounds for refusal, structuring public policy arguments
正在显示 SKILL.md
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | uk-law |
| title | UK neutral citation → BAILII URL |
| description | Verify UK law citations — primarily case law via neutral citation format (UKSC, UKHL, EWCA, EWHC, UKUT) against BAILII, plus UK statutes against legislation.gov.uk — and return verdict JSON. |
| author | kipeum86 |
| author_url | https://github.com/kipeum86/citation-auditor/tree/main/skills/verifiers/uk-law |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| execution_mode | open |
| jurisdiction | gb |
| practice | litigation |
| language | en |
You are the uk-law verifier.
Input:
$ARGUMENTS.{ "claim": <Claim>, "local_only": false }claim field and assume local_only: false.Required output:
{
"label": "verified|contradicted|unknown",
"rationale": "string",
"supporting_urls": ["https://example.com"],
"authority": 0.9
}
Rules:
authority must always be 0.9.supporting_urls: [] and use 원문 조회 실패 in rationale.Neutral citations follow the pattern [<year>] <court> <number>. BAILII URLs are constructed deterministically:
| Court code | Jurisdiction | URL pattern |
|---|---|---|
| UKSC | UK Supreme Court | https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/<year>/<number>.html |
| UKHL |
| House of Lords (pre-2009) |
https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/<year>/<number>.html |
| UKPC | Privy Council | https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/<year>/<number>.html |
| EWCA Civ | Court of Appeal Civil | https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/<year>/<number>.html |
| EWCA Crim | Court of Appeal Criminal | https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/<year>/<number>.html |
| EWHC | High Court (England & Wales) | https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/<division>/<year>/<number>.html where division is Admin, Ch, QB, Fam, TCC, Comm, etc. (from the parenthetical suffix in the neutral citation) |
| UKUT | Upper Tribunal | https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/<chamber>/<year>/<number>.html |
| UKFTT | First-tier Tribunal | https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/<chamber>/<year>/<number>.html |
| CSIH | Scottish Court of Session (Inner House) | https://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/<year>/<year>CSIH<number>.html (older format varies — search BAILII if URL fails) |
[2023] UKSC 42 → https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2023/42.html[2020] EWCA Civ 123 → https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2020/123.html[2019] EWHC 456 (Admin) → https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2019/456.html[2018] UKUT 321 (TCC) → https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/TCC/2018/321.htmlUnlike case law, UK statute URLs are harder to construct from a bare name because they require the chapter number. Strategy:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/<type>/<year>/<name-slug>https://www.legislation.gov.uk/search?title=<Act+Name>&year=<year> and parse the first result.Type codes:
ukpga = UK Public General Actukla = UK Local Actasp = Act of Scottish Parliamentssi = Scottish Statutory Instrumentuksi = UK Statutory InstrumentCommon examples:
Human Rights Act 1998 → https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contentsData Protection Act 2018 → https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/contentsEquality Act 2010 → https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contentsX v Y) — note: UK convention uses v without the period, unlike US v.local_only is true, return:
label: "unknown", rationale: "로컬 전용 모드에서는 외부 원문을 조회하지 않았습니다.", supporting_urls: [], authority: 0.9.https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/sino_search_1.cgi?query=<case+name>, pick the best match.
c. If nothing resolves → contradicted with rationale <citation>은 BAILII에서 찾을 수 없습니다. 해당 판례가 존재하지 않거나 인용 형식이 잘못되었을 수 있습니다.
d. If the case resolves, compare the claim's asserted content (court, year, holding) against the BAILII page. Match → verified. Clear mismatch → contradicted with the actual holding or date.contradicted with rationale <Act name> <year>은 legislation.gov.uk에서 찾을 수 없습니다. 해당 법률이 존재하지 않거나 제목/연도가 잘못되었을 수 있습니다.
d. If match, compare the claim's asserted section content.site:bailii.org <neutral citation> for cases, or site:legislation.gov.uk <Act name> <year> for statutes.
b. If the WebSearch returns the expected BAILII case page or legislation.gov.uk Act page → treat as existence confirmed and compare its snippet to the claim as you would the WebFetch body.
c. Zero domain-scoped results after the WebSearch retry → contradicted with the standard non-existence rationale for that citation type.
d. If both WebFetch and WebSearch fail (network error, both denied) → unknown with rationale 원문 조회 실패 and supporting_urls: [].supporting_urls for every successful fetch.Claim: In R (Miller) v Prime Minister [2019] UKSC 41, the Supreme Court unanimously held that the Prime Minister's advice to prorogue Parliament was unlawful.
Flow:
[2019] UKSC 41.https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2019/41.html.label: "verified"rationale: "[2019] UKSC 41은 Miller v Prime Minister 판결로 BAILII에서 확인되며, 2019년 9월 24일 대법원 전원합의체가 만장일치로 영국 총리의 의회 정회 권고가 위법이라 판단한 것으로 주장과 일치합니다."supporting_urls: ["https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2019/41.html"]authority: 0.9Claim: The Court of Appeal in Holdings Ltd v Smith [2024] EWCA Civ 9999 reversed the lower court on equitable estoppel.
Flow:
[2024] EWCA Civ 9999.https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2024/9999.html.label: "contradicted"rationale: "[2024] EWCA Civ 9999는 BAILII에서 찾을 수 없습니다. 해당 판례가 존재하지 않거나 인용 형식이 잘못되었을 수 있습니다."supporting_urls: []authority: 0.9Claim: Section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 makes it unlawful for a public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right.
Flow:
Human Rights Act 1998; section 6.https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/section/6.label: "verified"rationale: "Human Rights Act 1998 s.6의 원문('It is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right.')이 주장과 일치합니다."supporting_urls: ["https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/section/6"]authority: 0.9