菜单
Detect legal-source conflicts across definitions, scope, obligations, sanctions, and recency, then produce structured conflict reports.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill conflict-detector命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Use when retrieving arbitration institutional rules (ICC, LCIA, SCC, SIAC, HKIAC, VIAC, МКАС/МАК при ТПП України, UNCITRAL) — fetching current version, verifying redaction applicable to the date of arbitration agreement, constructing URLs for official rule texts
Use when choosing the Polish legal regime for letters, requests, applications, complaints, petitions, public-information requests, KPA filings, PPSA complaints, RODO access requests, registry extracts, court-file access, tax/ZUS/cudzoziemcy/USC procedures, or professional lawyer letters. Prevents mixing UDIP, KPA, PPSA, RODO, registry, special-procedure, and advocate/radca letter regimes.
Use when preparing applications for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Poland, applications for setting aside arbitral awards under KPC art. 1205–1211, or opposing such applications — mapping Article V of the 1958 New York Convention to art. 1214–1215 of the Polish KPC, identifying grounds for refusal, structuring public policy arguments
正在显示 SKILL.md
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | conflict-detector |
| title | Conflict Detector |
| description | Detect legal-source conflicts across definitions, scope, obligations, sanctions, and recency, then produce structured conflict reports. |
| author | kipeum86 |
| author_url | https://github.com/kipeum86/game-legal-research/tree/main/.claude/skills/conflict-detector |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| execution_mode | open |
| jurisdiction | general |
| practice | general |
| language | en |
Use this skill during Step 6 when conflicts appear.
Use references/conflict-report-template.md.
Resolution priority:
Before marking a conflict resolved or unresolved, apply the deterministic helper in
citation_auditor.conflict_resolution:
from citation_auditor.conflict_resolution import resolve_conflict
resolution = resolve_conflict(claim_a, claim_b, sources, target_jurisdictions, profile="general")
resolution.outcome == "resolved", use preferred_source_id in the conflict
report and include the helper's top rationale in provisional_resolution.resolution.outcome == "unresolved", keep the conflict tagged
[Unresolved Conflict] and record the score delta/rationale in
residual_uncertainty.Use a matter-specific profile when the conflict fits one of these patterns:
| Profile | Use When |
|---|---|
eu-member-state | EU regulation/case law conflicts with member-state source, agency guidance, or implementation material |
us-federal-state | US federal and state sources may conflict, especially where preemption is raised |
kr-delegated-regulation | Korean statute, delegated regulation, ordinance, and agency guidance hierarchy matters |
agency-guidance | Agency guidance or FAQ appears to conflict with statute, regulation, or case law |
If none fits cleanly, keep profile="general" and mark close-score results
.
[Unresolved Conflict][Unresolved Conflict] when unresolved.output/unresolved-conflicts.jsonWhen a conflict is marked [Unresolved Conflict] (i.e., it cannot be resolved after
applying the resolution-priority rules and any source-expansion attempt), write a record
to output/unresolved-conflicts.json.
{
"conflict_id": "CF-001",
"first_detected": "2026-03-05",
"last_seen": "2026-03-05",
"times_encountered": 1,
"type": "obligation",
"severity": "high",
"jurisdictions_involved": ["NL", "AU"],
"domains_involved": [1],
"description": "Conflicting obligations on loot-box disclosure between NL KSA ruling and AU ACCC guidance",
"claim_a": {
"summary": "NL: loot boxes are games of chance requiring full odds disclosure",
"source_id": "NL-A1",
"citation": "[A1] KSA, Decision 2024-07-01, p. 12",
"grade": "A"
},
"claim_b": {
"summary": "AU: loot boxes are not gambling under Qld Racing Act s. 4",
"source_id": "AU-P2",
"citation": "[P2] Queensland Racing Act 2002, s. 4",
"grade": "A"
},
"resolution_attempted": true,
"resolution_outcome": "unresolved",
"residual_uncertainty": "Whether AU federal law may impose separate disclosure requirements",
"next_steps": "Check Australian Consumer Law Schedule 2, Competition and Consumer Act 2010",
"status": "open"
}
Before writing, check if an entry with the same jurisdictions_involved + domains_involved
type already exists in the file.last_seen and increment times_encountered. Do not
create a new entry.Set status to "open" when first written. Change to "resolved" only when a
subsequent research session provides a definitive primary-source resolution.
Update output/unresolved-conflicts.json immediately when the conflict is detected —
do not wait until Step 9.
When the main agent loads this file at session start:
"open" entries whose jurisdictions_involved and domains_involved
overlap with the current query's scope.