菜单
Drafts persuasive mediation statements for litigation, structuring narrative across liability, damages, medical evidence, experts, and settlement positioning for plaintiff or defense. Use when preparing mediation briefs, settlement statements, ADR submissions, or pre-mediation filings.
默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt；你也可以切换为直接命令，或下载本地副本。
决定是否安装前，请先阅读 SKILL.md，以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt；运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill mediation-statement命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地？可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | mediation-statement |
| title | Mediation Statement |
| description | Drafts persuasive mediation statements for litigation, structuring narrative across liability, damages, medical evidence, experts, and settlement positioning for plaintiff or defense. Use when preparing mediation briefs, settlement statements, ADR submissions, or pre-mediation filings. |
| author | CaseMark |
| author_url | https://github.com/CaseMark/skills/tree/main/skills/legal/mediation-statement |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| execution_mode | open |
| jurisdiction | general |
| practice | litigation |
| language | en |
Drafts a mediation statement that educates the mediator on case strengths and positions the client for favorable settlement. Works for both plaintiff and defense — adjust framing accordingly.
Gather before drafting:
Target 5–15 pages, single-spaced, numbered exhibits. Submit 7–10 days before mediation unless mediator specifies otherwise.
Caption (Party v. Party, Case No.), mediation date, mediator name, brief cooperative opening.
2–3 sentences: case type, central disputed issue, client's position.
Present chronologically with strategic framing:
Structure element-by-element (duty → breach → causation → comparative fault):
PI cases — analyze each category with client-favorable framing:
| Category |
|---|
| Focus |
|---|
| Pre-incident history | Frame favorably for client |
| Post-incident treatment | Records vs. claims |
| Causation | Medical evidence linking injuries to incident |
| Objective vs. subjective | Emphasize objective findings |
| Treatment gaps | Inconsistencies, delayed treatment |
| Activity level | Exaggeration or genuine limitation |
Non-PI cases — analyze business records, contracts, communications; assess damage documentation.
Break down each category and assess credibility:
Frame in light most favorable to client.
Chronological table of all demands and offers (date, party, amount, notes). Analyze movement and why opponent's current position is unrealistic.
Do not propose a specific number. Instead:
Attach only high-impact documents: key deposition excerpts, medical chronologies, expert reports, critical communications. Limit volume — excess dilutes impact.
