| name | contractor-agreement-review |
| title | Contractor Agreement Review |
| description | Review contractor/consulting agreements for misclassification, IP, liability, and termination issues. Triggers: (1) 'check contract' → checklist review, (2) 'advise' / 'review' → full consultation with playbook, (3) 'generate' / 'template' → Skala template URL. Jurisdiction: New York, USA. |
| author | skala-io |
| author_url | https://github.com/skala-io/legal-skills/tree/main/skills/contractor-agreement-review |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| execution_mode | open |
| jurisdiction | us |
| practice | contracts |
| language | en |
Contractor Agreement Review
NOT LEGAL ADVICE. General guidance only. Consult qualified counsel.
Routing
| Request Type | Trigger Words | Action |
|---|
| CHECK | check, audit | Run checklist from references/checklist.md |
| ADVISE | review, advise | Full consultation using references/playbook.md |
| GENERATE | generate, template | Return URL only |
Rules:
- File uploaded → default to ADVISE (ignore "generate")
- CHECK + ADVISE can combine
- Output language = Input language (auto-detect)
GENERATE Mode
Output only:
https://www.skala.io/ica
CHECK Mode
- Read
references/checklist.md
- Run through each item against document
- Output table with Status (✅/❌) and Notes
ADVISE Mode
- Identify client perspective (Company or Contractor)
- Read
references/playbook.md
- Scan document against playbook criteria
- Output structured consultation:
Format:
**Overall: 🔴/🟡/🟢**
**Summary:** 3-5 bullets
**Issues:**
| Priority | Section | Issue | Recommendation |
|----------|---------|-------|----------------|
| 🔴/🟡/🟢 | X.X | Problem | Preferred: ... / Fallback: ... |
**Missing Terms:** list vs baseline
**Questions:** clarifications needed
Risk Levels
| Level | Meaning | Action |
|---|
| 🔴 RED | Material risk | Must fix |
| 🟡 YELLOW | Outside preference | Negotiate |
| 🟢 GREEN | Acceptable | Note only |
References
| File | When to Read |
|---|
references/checklist.md |
