| name | pattern-jianlu-yuejie |
| description | ????????????Use when upstream ????/???? suggests ??/?? as a special or non-standard pattern candidate and Codex must evaluate formation supports, risks, fallback routing, and product-facing explanation without deterministic fate claims. |
??????
Source
When to Use
Use when upstream analysis suggests ????.
Inputs
{
"pattern_candidate": "????",
"day_master": "",
"month_branch": "",
"revealed_stems": [],
"hidden_stems": {},
"ten_gods": {},
"combinations_clashes": [],
"roots_strength": {}
}
Procedure
- Confirm that ??/?? is genuinely active, not merely present.
- Check formation supports: ????????????.
- Check failure risks: ?????????.
- If evidence is insufficient, route back to normal pattern analysis rather than forcing ????.
- Send mixed cases to
yongshen-chunza, yongshen-chengbai-jiuying, and geju-gaodi.
- Produce product language around: ???????????????.
Output
{
"pattern": "????",
"candidate_strength": "?|?|?|??",
"formation_supports": [],
"failure_risks": [],
"fallback_route": "",
"needs_next_skill": [],
"plain_explanation": "",
"product_keywords": ["???????????????"]
}
Boundaries
- Do not make deterministic fate claims.
- Do not force special patterns when evidence is insufficient.
- Do not skip upstream ???? and ????.
- Do not ignore fallback to normal pattern analysis.