a2ui-generation

name	a2ui-generation
description	| Use when this capability is needed.

A2UI Generation

What This Skill Does

• Generate or refactor A2UI updateComponents and updateDataModel
• Output a unified Python transformation entry in DTO Component mode
• Iterate on existing files rather than rewriting everything from scratch each round
• Gate quality through design review and validation scripts

Execution Boundary

• Do not proactively search, read, borrow from, or imitate historical examples, old artifacts, sample pages, sample JSON, sample HTML, or screenshot outputs in the repository unless the user explicitly requests it
• By default, rely only on the user's current input, currently attached files, and this skill's own documentation
• If the user provides a DTO, do not hard-code business facts

First Principle: User Requirements First

• Global first principle: User requirements first
• When a feature explicitly requested by the user conflicts with a skill default rule, prioritize the user requirement
• Do not "pretend to comply with the skill"; explicitly record the conflict and apply a targeted exemption during the validation phase
• Exemptions are scoped only to items the user explicitly requested — never use them as an excuse to disable validation globally
• Choose an appropriate layout style based on the user's requirements and intent; using the same layout style and color scheme across multiple queries is forbidden

Query / Search Term Scenario Detection

Before entering mode selection, determine whether the user input is an information summary card scenario:

Trigger conditions: The user provides a natural language search query, place name, person name, event name, or concept word (e.g., "Snow in the Forbidden City", "West Lake", "Su Dongpo") and asks for an information card.

⚠️ CRITICAL WARNING — English model content inflation risk: When generating cards for query/search-term inputs in English, there is a strong model tendency to produce article-style content with long paragraphs, full narrative sections, and detail-page structures. This is always wrong for summary cards. Treat every word below as a hard constraint, not a suggestion.

Mandatory card shape for this scenario (non-negotiable):

• Structure locked to: Title → Core attributes (1–3) → Brief summary (≤ 2 lines) → Tag group → Optional CTA
• Main sections ≤ 3
• Body text ≤ 2 paragraphs; each paragraph ≤ 3 lines
• FORBIDDEN: Dynamic List child templates (i.e., children.componentId-driven template rows such as tips_item_template) — this is a detail-page structure, not a summary card
• FORBIDDEN: Full-width hero image (aspect-ratio: 16/9 + width: 100%) — this is a page header, not a card element
• FORBIDDEN: Expanding the card into an article or content detail page (multiple long body paragraphs + full lists)
• Total card height must not exceed 2/3 of screen height

Canonical layout patterns (choose one; do not invent new structures):

• Horizontal summary card: small thumbnail on the left + title / core metrics / tags / CTA on the right (suitable for POIs, attractions, products)
• Vertical summary card: title section at top + core metrics row (2–3 numeric metrics side by side) + one-line summary + tags + CTA (suitable for events, people, concepts)

Pre-generation self-check (mandatory before writing any JSON):

• Main sections ≤ 3?
• No dynamic List sub-templates?
• No full-width hero image?
• Body paragraphs ≤ 2, each ≤ 3 lines?
• Total height within 2/3 screen? If any item fails → converge first or escalate to page explicitly. Never bypass.

Mode Selection

Before starting, determine:

1. Does the user want a component/card or a full page?
2. Has the user provided a DTO?

Default to generating a component / card for the user, unless the user explicitly says they want a full page.

Then enter exactly one of the following three modes:

Mode 1: DTO Component

Applicable when:

• The user has provided a DTO
• The user wants a component / card

Deliverables:

1. Python transformer code
2. updateComponents JSON
3. updateDataModel JSON

Unified entry function:

def build_component_payload_from_dto(dto: dict) -> tuple[dict, dict]:
    ...

Mode 2: Non-DTO Component

Applicable when:

• The user has not provided a DTO
• The user wants a component / card

Deliverables:

1. updateComponents JSON
2. updateDataModel JSON

Mandatory order (must not be reversed):

1. Output UI layout (updateComponents) first
2. Output data (updateDataModel) second

Mode 3: Non-DTO Page

Applicable when:

• The user has not provided a DTO
• The user wants a full page

Deliverables:

1. updateComponents JSON
2. updateDataModel JSON

Mandatory order (must not be reversed):

1. Output UI layout (updateComponents) first
2. Output data (updateDataModel) second

Supplementary rules:

• Only the three modes above are defined by default
• If the user provides a DTO but explicitly wants a full page, do not silently apply one of these modes; ask first whether to design the page as DTO-driven

Read Only What You Need

Do not read all sub-documents by default. Load only what the current task requires:

Task type	Required docs	Load on demand
DTO component	reference/dto-component-mode.md, reference/component-design.md	reference/component-catalog.md, reference/data-binding.md, reference/visual-interaction.md, reference/design-review.md, reference/spacing-elevation.md, reference/expressiveness-toolkit.md
Non-DTO component	reference/component-catalog.md, reference/component-design.md	reference/data-binding.md, reference/visual-interaction.md, reference/design-review.md, reference/spacing-elevation.md, reference/expressiveness-toolkit.md
Non-DTO page	reference/component-catalog.md, reference/page-design.md, reference/visual-interaction.md	reference/data-binding.md, reference/review-validation.md, reference/design-review.md, reference/spacing-elevation.md
Bug fix / review / iterating on existing artifacts	reference/review-validation.md	Whichever doc is directly related to the issue

Additional notes:

• Load reference/component-catalog.md when you need to verify atomic components, charts, fields, allowed values, or style whitelists

• Load reference/data-binding.md when you need to verify path binding, template binding, or relative path rules

• Load reference/component-design.md when you need to verify component height budgets, card content budgets, or multi-column text budgets

• Load reference/page-design.md when you need to verify full-page structure, layout composition, or page-level sectioning

• Load reference/spacing-elevation.md when you need spacing scale, shadow elevation, or border radius guidance

• Load reference/expressiveness-toolkit.md when you need to add visual richness: inline color, color blocks, icons, opacity, pseudo-gradients

• Load reference/design-review.md when performing model-level design review after script validation passes

Output Persistence

Final artifacts should be written to files by default, and the user should be told the paths explicitly.

Priority order:

1. If the user specifies a directory or filename, save according to that
2. If the user provides an existing artifact directory, prefer saving near that context
3. Otherwise choose a clear, sensible, easy-to-find location

Default file naming:

• *_components.json
• *_datamodel.json
• *_transformer.py or *_vo.py

Non-DTO mode write order (mandatory):

1. Generate and save *_components.json first
2. Generate and save *_datamodel.json second

To save tokens:

• Write the first draft to disk immediately after generation
• If the user continues modifying, iterate on the existing file by default
• Each round of changes should edit the file and work from a diff — do not repaste the entire JSON in the conversation

Workflow

1. Read user input; confirm mode, data source, interaction requirements, and visual constraints
2. Load only the sub-documents the current task truly needs
3. Before formal output, explicitly list the layout rationale: at minimum describe the main sections, visual focal point, information rhythm, key horizontal relationships, and the role of images
4. Based on that layout rationale, draft an internal first version, then perform at least 1 explicit design improvement before proceeding to formal output
5. Output the first draft formally and write it to disk immediately (non-DTO mode: components before datamodel, mandatory)
6. Run scripts/validate_a2ui.py immediately; if it fails, fix the file directly and re-run until it passes
7. Only after the script passes for the first time, perform design quality review following reference/design-review.md; apply improvements directly to the on-disk file
8. After design review improvements, perform a dedicated "protected content abnormal wrapping" check on all horizontal layouts — prioritize checking whether short phrases, CTAs, ratings, times, and prices are being squeezed and broken by narrow fixed widths
9. If the model review modifies files, re-run the validation script; deliver only after it passes again
10. At delivery, clearly state the output file paths; if placeholder links were used, explicitly remind the user to replace them

When a "user explicitly required item conflicts with a rule":

• Use overrides.json to exempt only the conflicting checks at minimum scope
• Exempt only the relevant check; do not disable other validations as collateral

Non-Negotiables

Only truly irreplaceable business invariants that scripts cannot fully substitute are listed here:

• Non-DTO mode must produce UI layout (updateComponents) before data (updateDataModel)
• Do not output fake buttons; clickable elements must use a real Button + action
• Real buttons must have visible label text; do not rely solely on variant to guess the runtime background color
• DTO fields must pass a semantic validity check before display; non-empty does not equal informative
• When semantic meaning depends on a combination of fields (e.g., status + time), perform the combination mapping first, then decide whether to display or omit
• Component/card mode must not silently become page-like; do not deliver a near-full-screen large card
• Component mode content should converge first; escalate to page only when convergence fails, and do so explicitly
• Card hard gate (self-check before generating any JSON): main sections ≤ 3; no dynamic List sub-templates (i.e., children.componentId-driven template rows); no full-width hero image (aspect-ratio: 16/9 + width: 100%); body paragraphs ≤ 2; if any item fails, converge first or escalate to page explicitly — bypassing is not allowed
• Information summary card scenario (query/search-term driven): structure is locked to Title → Core attributes (1–3) → Brief summary (≤ 2 lines) → Tag group → CTA; expanding into article narrative structure is forbidden
• Tag group and CTA must be in separate rows: when a card bottom has both a tag group (>= 2 tags) and a CTA button, they must be separated using Column (tag row first, CTA below); placing them in the same Row is forbidden — even flex-wrap and flex-shrink cannot prevent the CTA from overflowing and being clipped
• ⚠️ English model content inflation guard: When query input is in English, the model tends to generate long-form article content. For every card task, actively resist generating: multiple long body paragraphs, full visitor tip lists, narrative sections, or any structure that resembles a detail page. If you find yourself writing more than 2 paragraphs of body text, stop and converge immediately
• A single card defaults to one main card shell; a full visual shell (background + border-radius + drop-shadow) inside a Card is forbidden
• A row of multiple images defaults to Row + flex fill; downgrade to a horizontal scroll container (List direction=horizontal) only when narrow-screen clipping risk is real
• Protected content — short phrases, CTAs, rating values, prices, times — must not wrap or fragment due to a fixed narrow width

Resources

• Sub-document index: reference.md

• Component catalog: reference/component-catalog.md

• Data binding: reference/data-binding.md

• DTO mode: reference/dto-component-mode.md

• Component design: reference/component-design.md

• Page design: reference/page-design.md

• Visual & interaction: reference/visual-interaction.md

• Spacing & elevation: reference/spacing-elevation.md

• Expressiveness toolkit: reference/expressiveness-toolkit.md

• Design review: reference/design-review.md

• Review & validation: reference/review-validation.md

• Validation script: scripts/validate_a2ui.py

---

Source: AGenUI/AGenUI — distributed by TomeVault.