用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/tomevault-io/skills-registry --skill word-smithy命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | word-smithy |
| description | > Use when this capability is needed. |
The editorial workshop. One entry point for all writing workflows.
Read the shared config and project config (if present) to discover all available resources.
Shared config location: ~/.claude/shared/word-smithy/config.md
Project config location: .word-smithy/config.md in the current project root
From each config, load:
Do NOT load references or protocol bodies yet. Those are loaded on demand.
Scan for writing-related context that exists outside word-smithy's own configs:
CLAUDE.md in the project root (look for voice, style, tone, or writing sections).claude/rules/ files that mention writing, voice, editorial, or style~/.claude/CLAUDE.md (global rules).cursorrules or .github/copilot-instructions.md (for Cursor/Copilot users)If any are found, acknowledge them:
I found existing writing context in:
- [list files found]
I'll use these alongside word-smithy's configs. If anything conflicts, your project-level rules win.
This ensures word-smithy layers on top of what the user already has rather than replacing it. Users do not need to migrate existing rules into word-smithy's format for them to be respected.
After loading configs and discovering context, check whether anything meaningful was found. Specifically:
voice paths in the config(s) point to files that actually exist?If no voice file exists AND no external writing context was found, the user has nothing loaded. Enter onboarding mode instead of proceeding to Step 2.
If a voice file exists (or meaningful writing context was found in Step 1b), skip onboarding and proceed to Step 2.
When onboarding is triggered, walk the user through creating a minimal voice profile. Don't send them to the guide. Do it here, interactively.
Say:
word-smithy is installed, but you don't have a voice profile yet. That's the thing that keeps your AI from sounding like a robot.
Want to set one up now? Takes about five minutes.
If the user says no, proceed to Step 2 with no voice loaded (the skill still works, just without voice guardrails).
If the user says yes, walk through these four steps:
1. Collect samples
Paste 2-3 short pieces of writing you're proud of. Emails, blog posts, social posts, anything. I need to hear what you sound like.
Read what they provide. Identify patterns: sentence length habits, vocabulary preferences, structural tendencies, tone.
2. Confirm the patterns
Present what you found:
Here's what I'm noticing in your writing:
- [structural pattern, e.g., "You lead with the problem, not the solution"]
- [sentence pattern, e.g., "Short sentences mixed with longer ones, lots of contractions"]
- [vocabulary pattern, e.g., "Plain words, no jargon"]
Does that sound right? Anything I'm missing?
Let them correct or add. This is collaborative, not prescriptive.
3. Hard bans
What words or phrases do you never want to see in your writing? Things that make you cringe when AI produces them.
Common ones people ban: "leverage," "utilize," "Furthermore," "It's worth noting," "It's not X. It's Y."
Collect their list.
4. Save the profile
Write the voice profile to ~/.claude/shared/voice-core.md (or whatever path their config specifies). Use the structure from the Creating a Voice Profile guide. Confirm:
Saved your voice profile to
~/.claude/shared/voice-core.md. It's loaded now and will be loaded every time you invoke/word-smithy.This is a living document. Next time something sounds off, tell me and I'll update it.
Then proceed to Step 2.
After onboarding, offer next steps (don't block on them):
Your voice profile is set. Two optional things when you have time:
- Condense a writing book you love into an AI reference (see
guides/condensing-a-book.md)- Write a protocol for a workflow you repeat (see
guides/writing-a-protocol.md)For now, let's write something.
Ask the user:
What are you working on?
Wait for a plain-text answer. No menu, no numbered options.
Scan all protocol paths from both configs (shared + project). For each .md file found:
name, triggers, and description fieldsMatch the user's answer against the triggers field of all discovered protocols. Use semantic matching, not exact string matching. The triggers field contains representative phrases, not an exhaustive list.
If a match is found:
Looks like [protocol name]. [description]
Running it.
Then load the full protocol file and any files listed in its loads field. Walk through the protocol step by step.
If no match is found:
I don't have a protocol for that yet. Two options:
- Create one (I'll help you write a protocol doc for this workflow)
- Just write (I'll work with voice and principles loaded, no formal process)
If the user chooses "just write," proceed with voice + principles as guardrails. This is still better than writing without /word-smithy because the baseline context is active.
If the user chooses "create one," guide them through writing a new protocol doc:
/word-smithy invocationsWhen running a matched protocol:
loads field only when a step references them, not all at once.When no protocol matched and the user chose to freestyle:
For creating new protocol docs, use this frontmatter template:
---
name: [Human-Readable Name]
triggers: [comma-separated phrases that describe when to use this]
description: [One-line description shown when confirming the match]
layer: [shared or project]
loads:
- [paths to reference files this protocol needs]
---
The body of the protocol is the workflow itself. Write it however makes sense for the process. The skill reads and follows it as instructions.
Source: AndySparks/word-smithy — distributed by TomeVault.