flutter-mcp-boundary-audit

name	flutter-mcp-boundary-audit
description	Generic contract/schema boundary audit across authoring, discovery, validation, and execute—detecting split-brain between listings and invoke paths, gateway divergence, and permissive placeholders. Use when changing tool registration, RPC/plugin registries, dynamic tools, MCP or WebMCP surfaces, CLI exec aliases, OpenAPI or JSON Schema contracts, migrators/codegen, bridge argument encoding, or platform docs that describe API contracts. Use when this capability is needed.
metadata	{"author":"Arenukvern"}

Contract boundary audit

Skill ID: flutter-mcp-boundary-audit — name is historical; content is repository-neutral. Same workflow applies to MCP stacks, RPC gateways, plugin registries, and OpenAPI-style contracts.

Find split-brain bugs: what clients see in listings, catalogs, or docs ≠ what runtime enforces on invoke—or validation exists on one gateway only.

Typical symptoms:

• Advertised required fields differ from what invoke accepts (empty payload succeeds, wrong keys ignored)
• Host/catalog path validates; in-process or extension path does not (or the reverse)
• Migrator or codegen rewrites entries with empty or permissive schema placeholders
• Same logical capability registered twice with different schemas (listing vs invoke, or path A vs path B)
• Stale docs claim “always permissive” or “no validation” while code is fail-closed

When to run

Trigger (generic)	Audit focus
Tool/handler authoring, schema attachment at registration	Authoring → discovery payload
Dynamic or plugin registration on the app/runtime side	Runtime validate-before-handler
Server registry, forward/dispatch, catalog *_client_tool helpers	Registry listing + invoke
Host gateway (VM extension, IPC, HTTP proxy) before delegating to runtime	Host validate-before-delegate; fail-closed missing schema
In-process invoke (invokeDirect, browser hook, embedded bridge)	Same schema as listing; validate before execute
Entry migrator / codegen from annotated sources	Schema preservation, not permissive fallbacks
Shared schema module vs duplicate definitions	Dual-path parity
Bridge handlers, non-scalar arguments	Encoding (JSON, protobuf, etc.) vs handler expectations
Platform / ADR / registration docs	Stale claims vs code

Also run after changes to JSON Schema, OpenAPI request bodies, protobuf RPC messages, or plugin manifest input shapes when multiple gateways consume the same logical tool.

Boundary checklist

Trace authoring → discovery → validation → execute for every touched tool or RPC:

Step	Question	Where to look (your repo)
Authoring	Does the canonical input schema reach the registration/descriptor type (not dropped at a toolkit/bridge wrapper)?	Authoring layer / entry model / code generator output
Authoring	Do bridge tools encode non-scalar args consistently for legacy handlers?	Bridge helpers, adapter layers
Discovery	Does dynamic registration send the full inputSchema (not {} or implicit-any)?	App registration API, manifest emitter
Discovery	Does the host list/catalog tool expose the same schemas as the runtime registry?	List-tools handler vs app registration
Server registry	Does registry intent/metadata use real schema, not a permissive placeholder?	Registry builder, MCP tool → intent mapping
Validate (registry)	Does forward/dispatch call validate before execute?	Registry forward path
Validate (host gateway)	Does the host gateway validate before delegating? Fail-closed if schema missing?	Gateway implementation
Validate (runtime)	Does the runtime callback validate before handler?	Service extension / in-process hook
Validate (wire)	If wire args are strings/maps, is coercion applied before strict validation on paths that see wire shape?	Coercion module vs host-only typed JSON
Validate (in-process)	Does direct invoke validate before execute?	In-process entry invoke
Validate (CLI)	Do CLI exec / catalog commands use the same schema as MCP listing?	CLI dispatch vs server tools
Execute	Any .execute( / handler dispatch without prior validate in production code?	Grep (below)
Migrator	Does migration preserve primitive/required/additionalProperties from source schema?

Gateway divergence

Same logical tool may flow through different gateways—each must agree on schema and validation order:

Authoring (entry / descriptor)
    ├─► Runtime registration ──► extension/callback ──► handler
    ├─► In-process register (WebMCP / embedded) ──► invokeDirect
    └─► Host list/catalog ──► catalog invoke ──► host gateway ──► runtime

Gateway role	Must validate before	Fail if schema missing?
Runtime callback (extension, plugin hook)	handler	yes (production tools)
Registry forward	execute / handler	yes
Host gateway (proxy to runtime)	delegate call	yes
In-process invoke	execute	yes
Catalog / fmt_* / CLI wrapper	forward to runtime	yes (same as listing)
CLI exec	command dispatch	yes

Red flag: validation only in tests, only on the catalog path, or only on listing—not on the path your change actually uses.

Wire coercion (when applicable)

Some stacks deliver string-key maps on the wire (VM service extensions, JSON-RPC with loose typing). Separate concerns:

Mechanism	Role
Coerce-for-schema	Property-type coercion from wire strings before strict schema validation
Handler-side wire parsers	Optional when handlers still read raw wire maps
Outbound wire encoding	Handler args → wire-safe representation

Re-audit host gateway vs runtime callback if you add coercion on one side only—hosts that expect typed JSON must not assume runtime already coerced (and vice versa).

Dual-path parity

One logical capability often exists twice:

Path	Typical role	Listing / invoke
Runtime / app dynamic	Registered in the running app or plugin host	Extension name, dynamic registry
Host catalog	Server-side MCP tools, CLI aliases, OpenAPI routes	Prefixed or bare names on wire

For each shared tool, compare:

• required keys
• additionalProperties: false (or equivalent strictness)
• Host-only fields (e.g. connection) present on one path only
• Property types / enums
• Default values and coercion behavior

Document intentional deltas in your platform contract doc (not only in tests).

Red-flag grep

Run from your repository root. Adjust globs to your languages and package layout.

# Empty or permissive advertised schemas (JSON Schema style)
rg "inputSchema:\s*const\s*\{\s*'type':\s*'object'" --glob "*.dart" -g '!test/fixtures/**' -g '!**/after_*.dart'
rg '"type"\s*:\s*"object"\s*,\s*\}' --glob "*.{dart,ts,js,json,yaml}"
rg "_emptyObjectSchema|additionalProperties:\s*true" --glob "*.{dart,ts,js}"

# OpenAPI / generic permissive bodies
rg "additionalProperties:\s*true" --glob "*.{yaml,yml,json}"
rg "schema:\s*\{\s*\}" --glob "*.{yaml,yml}"

# Execute without validate (review each hit; exclude tests/fixtures)
rg "\.execute\(" --glob "*.{dart,ts,js}" | rg -v "validate|test/|_test\.|\.test\."

# Direct invoke bypass
rg "invokeDirect|invoke_direct|directInvoke" --glob "*.{dart,ts,js}"
# Manual review: validate appears before execute on each path

# Permissive registry placeholders
rg "emptyObjectSchema|empty_object_schema|placeholder.*schema|inputSchemaFrom" --glob "*.{dart,ts,js}"

# Migrator stripping schemas
rg "inputSchema|input_schema" --glob "*migrate*"

# Duplicate registration (e.g. JS + native)
rg "registerTool|register_tool" --glob "*.{dart,ts,js}"

# Stale “always permissive” docs
rg -i "permissive|additionalProperties:\s*true|no validation|accepts anything" --glob "*.md"

# Bridge / JSON args
rg "jsonEncode|JSON\.encode|serialize.*argument" --glob "*{bridge,entry,adapter}*"

Add project-specific patterns after completing Adapting to your repo.

E2E proof

Run your integration tests that cover listing + invalid invoke (not a specific app path).

Checklist:

1. List tools/resources (or OpenAPI GET) shows required and strict additionalProperties where intended.
2. Invoke with missing required → structured failure (ok: false, 4xx, or validation error)—before handler side effects.
3. Invoke with extra properties when schema is strict → same failure mode.
4. If dual paths exist, repeat on both catalog and runtime registration names.

Optional: schema parity unit tests comparing shared module vs duplicate definitions (no device required).

Report template

## Finding: [title]
- **Severity**: P0 | P1 | P2
- **Boundary**: authoring | discovery | validation | execute
- **Gateway**: runtime-callback | registry | in-process | host-gateway | cli | migrator | docs
- **Files**: ...
- **Symptom**: clients/docs see X; runtime does Y
- **Fix**: ...
- **Proof**: test name or grep command

Tracker (optional)

If your repo uses a superpowers/tracker or hardening program, record new findings there or as issues—do not reopen completed items unless regression.

Adapting to your repo

Before auditing, fill this map (keep in audit notes or PR description):

Role	Your location	Notes
Authoring	e.g. entry model, OpenAPI spec, @Tool annotations	Where canonical schema is defined
Discovery	e.g. registerDynamics, plugin manifest, MCP tools/list	What clients read
Registry / catalog	e.g. dynamic registry, server tool table	Listing vs invoke entry points
Host gateway	e.g. VM extension proxy, API gateway, sidecar	Validates before delegate?
Runtime callback	e.g. service extension, plugin host RPC	Validates before handler?
In-process invoke	e.g. WebMCP, embedded JS bridge	Same as tools/list?
CLI	e.g. exec, bare vs prefixed aliases	Same schema as MCP?
Shared schema module	e.g. interaction_input_schemas, OpenAPI components	Single source of truth?
Migrator / codegen	e.g. migrate agent-entries	Preserves required/properties?
Platform doc	e.g. INTENTCALL_PLATFORM.md, README contract section	Matches fail-closed code?

Checklist

• Map tool registration path (authoring → discovery).
• Map listing gateway vs invoke gateway(s); list every hop.
• Map schema representation (JSON Schema maps, OpenAPI, protobuf, Dart ObjectSchema, etc.).
• Add 2–3 repo-specific red-flag greps (permissive placeholder, your invoke helper name).
• Identify dual-path tools; note shared module or document intentional split.
• Run integration test or manual proof for one strict tool on every gateway you touched.

Deep reference

Worked example (mcp_flutter), file map, and regression patterns: reference.md

Related skills (mcp_flutter)

When working in this monorepo only:

• flutter-mcp-toolkit-custom-tools — authoring entries
• flutter-mcp-toolkit-intentcall-migration — migrate agent-entries
• flutter-mcp-toolkit-maintain-web — WebMCP / in-process invoke
• flutter-mcp-cli-runtime-validation — runtime validate-runtime

---

Source: Arenukvern/mcp_flutter — distributed by TomeVault.