code-review

name	code-review
description	Review completed changes for blockers, regressions, security, and scope drift. Use with /code-review before merge or final handoff. Use when this capability is needed.
metadata	{"author":"damian87x"}

Code Review

Use /code-review before merge or final handoff.

When to use

• Changes are complete and ready for review
• You need a second opinion before shipping
• You want to catch regressions, security issues, or scope drift

Steps

1. Read the diff — git diff for unstaged, git diff --staged for staged, or git diff main...HEAD for branch diff
2. Check for blockers — bugs, logic errors, missing error handling, broken contracts
3. Check for security — secrets in code, injection risks, auth gaps, unsafe defaults
4. Check for regressions — does the change break existing tests or documented behaviour?
5. Check for scope drift — does the change do more or less than requested?
6. Run tests if they exist and haven't been run

Rules

• Only flag issues that genuinely matter — no style nits, no formatting opinions
• If the code works, tests pass, and scope is right, say so clearly
• Flag anything you'd reject in a PR review

Output

• Verdict — PASS / NEEDS_CHANGES / BLOCKER
• Blocking — issues that must be fixed before merge
• Non-blocking — suggestions or observations
• Evidence reviewed — what was checked (diff, tests, build)

---

Source: damian87x/oh-my-copilot — distributed by TomeVault.