用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/tomevault-io/skills-registry --skill re-frame2-implementor命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | re-frame2-implementor |
| description | > Use when this capability is needed. |
This skill is workflow + guidance layered on the spec corpus at spec/. The spec is the contract; the reference impl under implementation/ is one worked example, not normative.
The job is to walk the engineer through two phases:
Full skill-disambiguation matrix lives at skills/README.md §Skill routing — single source. In brief: not for authoring on the CLJS reference, greenfield bootstrap, v1→v2 migration, live-app inspection, or pattern-rationale reading.
references/cardinal-rules.md)implementation/ and spec/ disagree, the spec wins.passed / claimed-applicable; a fixture you can't make pass without outside sources is a spec gap.day8/re-frame2 and ask before filing. Don't paper, don't invent, don't extrapolate from the reference — but don't auto-file either. Show the engineer the drafted title + body, restrict the body to public spec-quoted evidence (no private port source), and wait for explicit OK before running gh issue create. The skill runs in the engineer's port repo; spec gaps reach the framework maintainers via the upstream repo's GitHub issues — never via bd (re-frame2's internal tracker, never invoked from a published skill).gh issue create against a repo other than the one the engineer is working in, show the full draft (title, target repo, label set, body) and wait for explicit "yes" / "go" / "file it". Invoking the skill is consent to the workflow, not to each cross-repo write. See references/cardinal-rules.md §9.day8/re-frame2 commit/tag; verify the checkout's HEAD and origin before reading the spec, and record the pinned hash in DECISIONS.md (preamble before D1). An unverified checkout is not the contract.:rf/* scheme. Framework-owned ids live under the single root namespace :rf/* (and its sub-namespaces); user code MUST NOT register under :rf/*. Reserved fx-ids and reserved app-db keys (:rf/machines, :rf/route, …) are part of the contract. A port that ignores the scheme fails conformance fixtures that assert :rf.* operation ids. Per spec/Conventions.md; the "where does each surface live" map is spec/Ownership.md.Walk references/phase-1-decisions.md and produce a locked-decision record using the references/decision-record.md template. The seven decision blocks (D1 target language, D2 substrate, D3 scope, D4 the always-required realisation decisions — Implementor-Checklist Part 2's F1–F6 / S1–S3 / Sub1–Sub2 / V1–V3 / T1–T3 / E1–E2, sub-numbered 1:1 with the checklist, D5 schema mechanism, D6 integration story, D7 capability tag set) are detailed there; the canonical option matrices live in spec/Implementor-Checklist.md.
Output of Phase 1: a single dated decision record committed to the port's own repo.
With Phase 1 locked, walk references/phase-2-impl-order.md EP-by-EP. The leaf carries, for each EP: what to read first, the contract to expose, how the CLJS reference realised it (as one example, not normative), what the conformance fixtures check, common spec-gap traps.
Dependency order is fixed: EP 001 Registration → 002 Frames → 006 Reactive substrate → 004 Views → 009 Instrumentation, then a first conformance pass against the :core/* fixtures. Optional EPs (010 Schemas, 008 Testing, 005 State machines, 012 Routing, 011 SSR, 013 Flows, 014 HTTP, 007 Stories) follow in the order Phase 1 declared yes for them.
Three tiers, in priority order:
spec/ — the contract. Read in numeric order.spec/Implementor-Checklist.md — the decision-ordered companion.implementation/ — a worked example. Useful for "how did someone solve X?" Never useful as a contract claim.If implementation/ and spec/ disagree, the spec wins.
The corpus at spec/conformance/ is host-agnostic data. Harness shape, the EDN-handler-body DSL, capability tagging, scoring, and the spec-gap-vs-implementation-bug distinction are all in references/conformance.md. The corpus is the acceptance test for Goal 2 — AI-implementable from the spec alone.
references/kickoff-prompt.md — paste-ready prompt for the engineer to drop into a fresh Claude session opened in the root of their port repo.references/output-format.md — the standard agent-output shape: implementation summary, capability tags claimed, conformance score, decisions made, spec gaps filed.<capability tag set>"spec/API.md, adapted to host idiom.(claimed-applicable) / (claimed-applicable).day8/re-frame2.references/cardinal-rules.md — the eleven rules in prose + anti-pattern corollaries.references/phase-1-decisions.md — Phase 1 walkthrough, seven decision blocks.references/decision-record.md — fill-in template for the locked-decision record.references/phase-2-impl-order.md — EP-by-EP implementation order.references/reference-impl-tour.md — guided tour of the CLJS reference; what's substrate-specific vs pattern-required.references/conformance.md — corpus harness, DSL, capability tagging, scoring.references/kickoff-prompt.md — fresh-session kickoff prompt.references/output-format.md — agent-output shape.Authoritative contract: spec/. Decision companion: spec/Implementor-Checklist.md. Conformance: spec/conformance/. CLJS reference (worked example): implementation/. Full skill-disambiguation matrix: skills/README.md §Skill routing — single source.
Source: day8/re-frame2 — distributed by TomeVault.