用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/tomevault-io/skills-registry --skill code-testing-agent命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
| Use when this capability is needed.
> Use when this capability is needed.
Review architecture and API design for the vfs-s3 project. Use when the user mentions @architect, asks to review an issue's design, discuss module boundaries, API shape, or architectural decisions for vfs-s3. Also trigger when the user wants to create an ADR (Architecture Decision Record) or evaluate a technical approach for the project. Intended for dispatch from Codex automation or Claude routines; GitHub trigger phrase: @vfs-s3-bot please prepare design doc Use when this capability is needed.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | code-testing-agent |
| description | >- Use when this capability is needed. |
An AI-powered skill that generates comprehensive, workable unit tests for any programming language using a coordinated multi-agent pipeline.
Use this skill when you need to:
run-tests skill)writing-mstest-tests)This skill coordinates multiple specialized agents in a Research → Plan → Implement pipeline:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TEST GENERATOR │
│ Coordinates the full pipeline and manages state │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌─────────────┼─────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────────┐
│ RESEARCHER│ │ PLANNER │ │ IMPLEMENTER │
│ │ │ │ │ │
│ Analyzes │ │ Creates │ │ Writes tests │
│ codebase │→ │ phased │→ │ per phase │
│ │ │ plan │ │ │
└───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────┬───────┘
│
┌─────────┬───────┼───────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌───────┐ ┌───────┐ ┌───────┐
│ BUILDER │ │TESTER │ │ FIXER │ │LINTER │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ Compiles│ │ Runs │ │ Fixes │ │Formats│
│ code │ │ tests │ │ errors│ │ code │
└─────────┘ └───────┘ └───────┘ └───────┘
Make sure you understand what user is asking and for what scope. When the user does not express strong requirements for test style, coverage goals, or conventions, source the guidelines from unit-test-generation.prompt.md. This prompt provides best practices for discovering conventions, parameterization strategies, coverage goals (aim for 80%), and language-specific patterns.
Start by calling the code-testing-generator agent with your test generation request:
Generate unit tests for [path or description of what to test], following the [unit-test-generation.prompt.md](unit-test-generation.prompt.md) guidelines
The Test Generator will manage the entire pipeline automatically.
The code-testing-researcher agent analyzes your codebase to understand:
Output: .testagent/research.md
The code-testing-planner agent creates a structured implementation plan:
Output: .testagent/plan.md
The code-testing-implementer agent executes each phase sequentially:
code-testing-builder sub-agent to verify compilationcode-testing-tester sub-agent to verify tests passcode-testing-fixer sub-agent if errors occurcode-testing-linter sub-agent for code formattingEach phase completes before the next begins, ensuring incremental progress.
All pipeline state is stored in .testagent/ folder:
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
.testagent/research.md | Codebase analysis results |
.testagent/plan.md | Phased implementation plan |
.testagent/status.md | Progress tracking (optional) |
The generator picks a strategy based on request scope:
| User Request | Strategy | Why |
|---|---|---|
"Generate tests for src/services/UserService.ts" | Direct | Single file, small scope — write tests immediately, skip sub-agents |
| "Add unit tests for my billing project" | Single pass | Moderate scope — one Research → Plan → Implement cycle covers it |
| "Achieve 80% coverage across the entire solution" | Iterative | Large scope — multiple R→P→I cycles, each narrowing remaining gaps |
Given a request like "Generate unit tests for my InvoiceService", the pipeline produces:
.testagent/research.md containing detected language/framework, build commands, files to test ranked by priority, and existing test inventory.testagent/plan.md containing phased approach with specific methods and test scenarios (happy path, edge cases, error cases) for each fileThe code-testing-extensions skill provides concrete, filled-in examples for each pipeline phase showing real source code, real research output, real plans, and real generated tests. Call the code-testing-extensions skill to discover available extension files, then read:
dotnet-examples.md — MSTest example with InvoiceService: research output, plan output, generated test file, fix cycle walkthrough, and final report| Agent | Purpose |
|---|---|
code-testing-generator | Coordinates pipeline |
code-testing-researcher | Analyzes codebase |
code-testing-planner | Creates test plan |
code-testing-implementer | Writes test files |
code-testing-builder | Compiles code |
code-testing-tester | Runs tests |
code-testing-fixer | Fixes errors |
code-testing-linter | Formats code |
The code-testing-fixer agent will attempt to resolve compilation errors. Check .testagent/plan.md for the expected test structure. Call the code-testing-extensions skill and read the language-specific extension file for error code references (e.g., dotnet.md for .NET).
Most failures in generated tests are caused by wrong expected values in assertions, not production code bugs:
[Ignore] or [Skip] just to make them passSpecify your preferred framework in the initial request: "Generate Jest tests for..."
Tests that depend on external services, network endpoints, specific ports, or precise timing will fail in CI environments. Focus on unit tests with mocked dependencies instead.
During phase implementation, build only the specific test project for speed. After all phases, run a full non-incremental workspace build to catch cross-project errors.
Source: dotnet/skills — distributed by TomeVault.