test-driven-development

name	test-driven-development
description	Enforce RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle for reliable, maintainable code Use when this capability is needed.
metadata	{"author":"frankxai"}

Test-Driven Development (TDD)

The Fundamental Rule

NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST.

This is non-negotiable. Code written before tests must be deleted and rewritten with tests first.

Why TDD Matters

Testing after implementation provides false confidence:

• Tests pass immediately (proves nothing)
• No verification that tests catch regressions
• Untested edge cases slip through

TDD ensures every line of production code is proven necessary by a failing test.

The RED-GREEN-REFACTOR Cycle

1. RED - Write a Failing Test

// Write the test FIRST
describe('calculateTotal', () => {
  it('should sum items with tax', () => {
    const items = [{ price: 100 }, { price: 50 }];
    const result = calculateTotal(items, 0.08);
    expect(result).toBe(162); // 150 + 12 tax
  });
});

Run the test. It MUST fail. If it passes, you're testing existing code (wrong).

2. Verify RED

Confirm failure is for the right reason:

• ✅ "calculateTotal is not defined" - Correct, function doesn't exist
• ❌ "SyntaxError in test file" - Fix test, not production code

3. GREEN - Minimal Implementation

Write the simplest code that makes the test pass:

function calculateTotal(items: Item[], taxRate: number): number {
  const subtotal = items.reduce((sum, item) => sum + item.price, 0);
  return subtotal + (subtotal * taxRate);
}

4. Verify GREEN

• All tests pass
• No regressions introduced
• Coverage increased

5. REFACTOR

Improve code quality while keeping tests green:

• Extract functions
• Rename for clarity
• Remove duplication
• Improve performance

Common Rationalizations (Reject All)

Excuse	Reality
"I'll test after"	Tests passing immediately prove nothing
"Already manually tested"	Manual testing isn't systematic or repeatable
"Deleting work is wasteful"	Sunk cost fallacy; unverified code is debt
"Too simple to test"	Simple code breaks too; testing takes seconds
"Keep existing as reference"	You'll adapt it; that's testing after

Red Flags - Stop Immediately

• Writing code before tests
• Tests passing on first run
• Any "just this once" rationalization
• Skipping the verify steps

FrankX Application

For Next.js Components

// 1. RED - Write test first
describe('EmailSignup', () => {
  it('should show error for invalid email', async () => {
    render(<EmailSignup />);
    await userEvent.type(screen.getByRole('textbox'), 'invalid');
    await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'));
    expect(screen.getByText(/invalid email/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
  });
});

// 2. GREEN - Implement component
// 3. REFACTOR - Clean up

For API Routes

// 1. RED
describe('POST /api/subscribe', () => {
  it('should return 400 for invalid email', async () => {
    const response = await POST({ json: () => ({ email: 'bad' }) });
    expect(response.status).toBe(400);
  });
});

// 2. GREEN - Implement route
// 3. REFACTOR

Test File Organization

project/
├── app/
│   └── api/
│       └── subscribe/
│           └── route.ts
├── tests/
│   ├── unit/           # Fast, isolated tests
│   │   └── api/
│   │       └── subscribe.test.ts
│   ├── integration/    # Cross-component tests
│   └── e2e/           # Playwright tests
│       └── subscribe.spec.ts

Commands

# Run tests in watch mode
npm test -- --watch

# Run specific test file
npm test -- api/subscribe.test.ts

# Run with coverage
npm test -- --coverage

When to Use This Skill

• Writing any new feature
• Fixing bugs (write failing test FIRST)
• Refactoring (ensure tests exist)
• Code reviews (verify TDD was followed)

Related Skills

• systematic-debugging - When tests reveal bugs
• webapp-testing - For Playwright e2e tests
• implementation-planning - Plans include TDD steps

---

Converted and distributed by TomeVault — claim your Tome and manage your conversions.